Transition syntax about vidseq HOT 4 OPEN

Might just go with the shortest, it doesn't add more than one syntax, just the transition.

Although... The function-like one at the end does explain how the code works under the hood.

Y'know, I'm not sure, coz it doesn't really look like a function, it just seems like it. Idk.

from vidseq.

Okay it wouldn't make sense to have different ease functions on the same object at the same time, unless you were specifically wanting that for demonstration purposes.

I'm not a fan of the scopes or colon, so I'll stick with the first one - it makes sense, and you can definitely think of the length and easing function as a modifier to the transition, and the first syntax reflects that.

from vidseq.

Might still leave this issue open in case another idea pops into my head, or if anyone else has any ideas

from vidseq.

Okay, applying multiple transitions to different objects feels like a win. Could use a comma for that? I don't know why I didn't think of that before.

subject1, subject2 -> { }, { } 0s linear;
subject1, subject2 -> { }, { } 0s;
subject1, subject2 -> { }, { };

I suppose if someone wants to apply the same transition to different objects, it could be like this:

subject1, subject2, etc -> { } 0s linear;

Note, you can use the same amount of final values as the inputs, or just one and apply it to all inputs - you can't apply 2 final values to 3 inputs, or anything like that

from vidseq.