The care-o-bot from ipa320

Kinetic Release 03-2019

previous release: #51

cob_android: up-to-date 👉 0.1.4
cob_calibration_data: ros/rosdistro#20565 👉 0.6.10
cob_command_tools: ros/rosdistro#20572 👉 0.6.10
cob_common: kinetic: ros/rosdistro#20566, melodic: ros/rosdistro#20568 👉 0.6.10
cob_control: ros/rosdistro#20567 👉 0.7.3
cob_driver: ros/rosdistro#20570 👉 0.6.13
cob_environments: ros/rosdistro#20569 👉 0.6.7
cob_extern: up-to-date 👉 0.6.12
cob_gazebo_plugins: up-to-date 👉 0.7.2
cob_hand: up-to-date 👉 0.6.5
cob_manipulation: up-to-date 👉 0.7.1
cob_navigation: up-to-date 👉 0.6.7
cob_perception_common: ros/rosdistro#20571 👉 0.6.13
cob_robots: ros/rosdistro#20574 👉 0.6.7
cob_simulation: up-to-date 👉 0.6.10
cob_substitute: up-to-date 👉 0.6.7
cob_supported_robots: ros/rosdistro#20573 👉 0.6.10
schunk_modular_robotics: up-to-date 👉 0.6.12
~~sick_visionary_t:~~
care-o-bot: ros/rosdistro#20575 👉 0.6.7

How to install the cob_simulator

I start to work with care-o-bot4. But I cannot install simulation by "http://wiki.ros.org/Robots/Care-O-bot/indigo" (I have confirmed that it was installed in the last year, but not now.)
So I want to install by cob_simulator but I don't know how to install by cob_simulator in github.
Before I activate the hardware, I want to simulation hard.
I want you to help me simulate.
Thank you.

Indigo/Kinetic Release 01-2018

[travis] travis tests failing randomly

As discussed here there seems to be a problem with travis tests failing "randomly".
This should be investigated in more detail!

@ipa-fmw @ipa-mdl @ipa-bnm @ipa-mig FYI

Indigo Release 04-2016

Tracking the related PRs to rosdistro:

Indigo/Kinetic Release 07-2017

Tracking the related PRs to rosdistro:
⚠️ = not dual-distro compatible, i.e. indigo_dev for Indigo and kinetic_dev for Kinetic

Migration to package format 2

@ipa-fmw @ipa-nhg @ipa-mdl @ipa-mig @ipa-rmb @ipa-bnm

https://github.com/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+user%3Aipa320+Migration+package+format+2

Let's use this Issue for general discussion about what's still missing for a successfull migration to package format 2:

Remaining repos to be migrated:

cob_extern
cob_perception_common
cob_perception_data
cob_navigation
cob_android
care-o-bot (this package)
...

Remaining decisions to be applied wherever it occurs:

Are we going to install headers for "executable-only" packages?
...

Please contribute to the discussion in case something is not yet mentioned here...

[travis] improvements and extensions

@ipa-fez @ipa-jba @ipa-rmb @ipa-fmw @ipa-mig @ipa-nhg @ipa-mdl @fmessmer FYI

I'll start this issue for discussion that should lead to an improved/extended default .travis.yml that we use in all our repos (see list below).
I suggest to first discuss which new features are to be added to the new default .travis.yml and then provide PRs for all affected repos in a torrent for consistency!

New features to be added:

get rid of jade testing - once and for all - we do not support it...safes some jobs on the travis servers
enable compiler warnings as errors (as done by @ipa-fez e.g. in https://github.com/ipa320/ipa_navigation_driver/pull/40)
enable testing against releases, i.e. add entries to the CI matrix UPSTREAM_WORKSPACE=file to test with .rosinstall file + UPSTREAM_WORKSPACE=debian (default) to test against releases (I don't think we need to make another distinction against ROS_REPO=ros and ROS_REPO=ros-shadow-fixed
maybe we can even embed (Xdev?) jobs from the ROS build farm, e.g. like Idev__cob_robots__XXX
enable UPSTREAM/DOWNSTREAM testing see #39 (as tested in ipa320/cob_robots#680 - **NOTE: this is not yet available in industrial_ci/master)
anything else?
any other feature desired/helpful from https://github.com/ros-industrial/industrial_ci/blob/master/doc/index.rst#advanced-usage? e.g. CATKIN_LINT!

Who steps forward and is willing to provide a suggestive PR against care-o-bot, i.e. this, repo?

~~NAV-REPOS:~~

PERCEPTION-REPOS:

~~MSH-REPOS:~~

Please add repos in case I missed one...

Indigo/Kinetic Release 07-2018

cob_android: up-to-date
cob_calibration_data: ros/rosdistro#18589 ros/rosdistro#18590
cob_command_tools: ros/rosdistro#18645 ros/rosdistro#18646
cob_common: ros/rosdistro#18592 ros/rosdistro#18593
cob_control: ros/rosdistro#18610 ros/rosdistro#18611
cob_driver: ros/rosdistro#18596 ros/rosdistro#18597
cob_environments: up-to-date
cob_extern: up-to-date
cob_gazebo_plugins: up-to-date
cob_hand: ros/rosdistro#18598 ros/rosdistro#18599
cob_manipulation: up-to-date
cob_navigation: ros/rosdistro#18600 ros/rosdistro#18602
cob_perception_common: ros/rosdistro#18601 ros/rosdistro#18603
cob_robots: ros/rosdistro#18604 ros/rosdistro#18605
cob_simulation: ros/rosdistro#18606 https://github.com/ros/rosdistro/pulls
cob_substitute: up-to-date
cob_supported_robots: ros/rosdistro#18594 ros/rosdistro#18595
schunk_modular_robotics: ros/rosdistro#18607 ros/rosdistro#18608
~~sick_visionary_t~~:
care-o-bot: up-to-date

[travis] Check for missing dependencies

@ipa-fmw @ipa-mdl

Is there a way to configure travis in a way so that it tells us about missing dependencies as in

cob_bms_driver: missing dependency to diagnostic_updater
cob_sick_lms1xx: missing dependency to diagnostic_msgs

We would need something like "rosdep install isolated/packagewise-with-uninstall"?

@fmessmer FYI

[travis] setup downstream tests

i.e. test whether a change in:

cob_extern affects cob_driver
cob_supported_robots affects cob_robots
....

this can be done by adding the downstream dependencies to the .rosinstall file of the upstream repo

Review documentation

@ipa-fmw @ipa-nhg @ipa-mig @ipa-bnm @ipa-rmb

As we now have consequently reviewed and beautified our repositories and code, the next step commendable contribution to the ROS community could/should be to tend our attention to documentation!

I.e. we should:

review the maintainers mentioned in the package.xml
review and add a meaningful description to the package.xml (with this we would also get rid of the catkin_lint warnings about boilerplate description!)
create the wiki page - if not yet existing - (with this at least the packages could be found on the ros wiki)
preferably we actually add and update some docu to the wiki pages

I guess a minimum wiki documentation should include a meaningful description (from package.xml) and a descriptions of the ROS interfaces, i.e. subscribed/published topics/services/action as well as configurable parameters....)

care_o_bot_robot dependes on EOL package ipa_canopen

ipa_canopen was EOL in ros/rosdistro@c7a3fe4 and was removed from the package index, but care_o_bot_robot still depends on it.

Either ipa_canopen should be re-added, or care_o_bot_robot should remove the dependency and be released.

add cob_hand to travis.rosinstall and README

Kinetic Release Preparations

Tested repositories

Not Tested

(Note that those packages have not been tested for functionality!)

add LICENSE file to all cob repos

as of the latest rosdistro review guidelines, every released repo needs a LICENSE file
https://github.com/ros/rosdistro/blob/master/REVIEW_GUIDELINES.md#types-of-pull-requests

for the next release cycle we should add a LICENSE file for the Apache 2.0 license:
https://opensource.org/licenses/Apache-2.0

update travis to use industrial_ci

should be done for

bringup packages

cob_android (ipa320/cob_android#25)
cob_calibration_data (ipa320/cob_calibration_data#122)
cob_command_tools (https://github.com/ipa320/cob_command_tools/pull/183)
cob_common (https://github.com/ipa320/cob_common/pull/213)
cob_control (indigo: https://github.com/ipa320/cob_control/pull/145; kinetic: https://github.com/ipa320/cob_control/pull/146)
cob_docking (https://github.com/ipa320/cob_docking/pull/34)
cob_driver (https://github.com/ipa320/cob_driver/pull/323)
cob_environments (ipa320/cob_environments#119)
cob_extern (ipa320/cob_extern#79)
cob_gazebo_plugins (indigo: ipa320/cob_gazebo_plugins#26; kinetic: ipa320/cob_gazebo_plugins#27)
cob_hand (ipa320/cob_hand#14)
cob_manipulation (indigo: ipa320/cob_manipulation#102; kinetic: ipa320/cob_manipulation#103)
cob_navigation (ipa320/cob_navigation#83)
cob_perception_common (ipa320/cob_perception_common#76)
cob_robots (ipa320/cob_robots#626)
cob_simulation (ipa320/cob_simulation#140)
cob_substitute (ipa320/cob_substitute#44)
cob_supported_robots (ipa320/cob_supported_robots#2)
schunk_modular_robotics (ipa320/schunk_modular_robotics#184)
schunk_robots (ipa320/schunk_robots#75)
sick_flexisoft (https://github.com/ipa320/sick_flexisoft/pull/38)

msh packages

cob_people_perception (ipa320/cob_people_perception#63)
ipa_navigation (https://github.com/ipa320/ipa_navigation/pull/179)
ipa_navigation_common (indigo: https://github.com/ipa320/ipa_navigation_common/pull/109; kinetic: https://github.com/ipa320/ipa_navigation_common/pull/113)
ipa_navigation_driver (https://github.com/ipa320/ipa_navigation_driver/pull/35)
ipa_navigation_localization (https://github.com/ipa320/ipa_navigation_localization/pull/184)
ipa_navigation_perception (https://github.com/ipa320/ipa_navigation_perception/pull/26)
ipa_navigation_planning (https://github.com/ipa320/ipa_navigation_planning/pull/156)
ipa_navigation_sandbox (https://github.com/ipa320/ipa_navigation_sandbox/pull/204)
cob_karto (add by @ipa-mig)
msh (https://github.com/ipa320/msh/pull/671)
msh_common (https://github.com/ipa320/msh_common/pull/42)
msh_gui (https://github.com/ipa320/msh_gui/pull/10)
msh_voice_control (https://github.com/ipa320/msh_voice_control/pull/145)

optional packages

cob_object_perception (ipa320/cob_object_perception#46)
cob_environment_perception

New maintainers needed!

I am the maintainer of the following packages, which I cannot support anymore due to me changing jobs.
Who is willing to take over? (* might also be deleted)

Melodic testing/migration

because it was requested in ipa320/schunk_modular_robotics#206, why not at least add melodic checks to travis...

cob_android: ipa320/cob_android#35
- kinetic: ros/rosdistro#21955
- melodic: ros/rosdistro#21957
cob_calibration_data: ipa320/cob_calibration_data#154
- kinetic: ros/rosdistro#21926
- melodic: ros/rosdistro#21942
cob_command_tools: https://github.com/ipa320/cob_command_tools/pull/245
- kinetic: ros/rosdistro#21949
- melodic: ros/rosdistro#21950
cob_common: https://github.com/ipa320/cob_common/pull/271
- kinetic: ros/rosdistro#21933
- melodic: ros/rosdistro#21934
cob_control: https://github.com/ipa320/cob_control/pull/208
- kinetic: ~~ros/rosdistro#21937~~ ros/rosdistro#21983
- melodic: ~~ros/rosdistro#21938~~ ros/rosdistro#21984
cob_driver: ipa320/cob_driver#380
- kinetic: ros/rosdistro#21935
- melodic: ros/rosdistro#21943
cob_environments: ipa320/cob_environments#135
- kinetic: ros/rosdistro#21931
- melodic: ros/rosdistro#21932
cob_extern: ipa320/cob_extern#99
- kinetic: ros/rosdistro#21920
- melodic: ros/rosdistro#21921
cob_gazebo_plugins: ipa320/cob_gazebo_plugins#38
- kinetic: ros/rosdistro#21940
- melodic: ros/rosdistro#21941
cob_hand: ipa320/cob_hand#23
- kinetic: ros/rosdistro#21929
- melodic: ros/rosdistro#21930
cob_manipulation: ipa320/cob_manipulation#138
- kinetic: ros/rosdistro#23208
- melodic: ros/rosdistro#23209 partial release
cob_navigation: ipa320/cob_navigation#106
- kinetic: ros/rosdistro#21965
- melodic: ros/rosdistro#21966
cob_perception_common: ipa320/cob_perception_common#95
- kinetic: ros/rosdistro#21927
- melodic: ros/rosdistro#21928
cob_robots: ipa320/cob_robots#780
- kinetic: ros/rosdistro#22903
- melodic: ros/rosdistro#22936 partial release
cob_simulation: ipa320/cob_simulation#168
- kinetic: ros/rosdistro#22904
- melodic: ros/rosdistro#22937 partial release
cob_substitute: ipa320/cob_substitute#52
- kinetic: ros/rosdistro#21924
- melodic: ros/rosdistro#21925
cob_supported_robots: ipa320/cob_supported_robots#21
- kinetic: ros/rosdistro#21922
- melodic: ros/rosdistro#21923
~~schunk_modular_robotics~~: ➡️ maintained by @christian-rauch
~~sick_visionary_t~~:
care-o-bot: #53
- kinetic:
- melodic: ⚠️ cannot be release due to missing dependencies see ipa320/cob_robots#782

not to be released:

cob_docking: https://github.com/ipa320/cob_docking/pull/47
➡️ new tag 0.0.2
ipa_differential_docking: https://github.com/ipa320/ipa_differential_docking/pull/3
➡️ new tag 0.0.2
pointcloud_to_laserscan: https://github.com/ipa320/pointcloud_to_laserscan/pull/13
➡️ new tag 1.3.2
sick_flexisoft: https://github.com/ipa320/sick_flexisoft/pull/53
➡️ new tag 0.1.2
canopen_test_utils: ipa320/canopen_test_utils#7
➡️ new tag 0.7.0

[Discussion] Allow Multi-robot simulation

@ipa-srd @ipa-srd-fg

The goal is to prepare the cob_bringup/cob_bringup_sim structure (as well as everything that comes with it, e.g. robot_description, controller,...) to be able to use multiple robots at the same time.
This might later be extended to a multi-master setup....

Feel free to add more issues and problems faced in order to be able to solve them in accordance with single-robot usecase

@ipa-fmw @ipa-nhg @ipa-mig FYI

Review tests: unittests, gtests, launch_file_checks test_depend

@ipa-fmw @ipa-nhg @ipa-mdl @ipa-mig @ipa-rmb @ipa-bnm @fmessmer FYI

This should be done after migration to package xml format 2 has been completed
See related comment

ipa320 / care-o-bot Goto Github PK

care-o-bot's People

Contributors

Stargazers

Watchers

Forkers

care-o-bot's Issues

bringup packages

msh packages

optional packages

Recommend Projects

Recommend Topics

Recommend Org