Question about Table 1 and Table 2 in paper. about gaussian-slam HOT 4 CLOSED

Hey there, for this work we used DROID-SLAM for our tracking backend. So if you want to track performance on those datasets you can directly check the DROID-SLAM performance in tracking.

One more thing, we are about to get permission to release the code (we hope 1 or 2 weeks at most) and plan to do it ASAP. In the released code there will be a new tracking method with new (better) results which will be also reflected on arxiv.

from gaussian-slam.

Hey there, for this work we used DROID-SLAM for our tracking backend. So if you want to track performance on those datasets you can directly check the DROID-SLAM performance in tracking.

One more thing, we are about to get permission to release the code (we hope 1 or 2 weeks at most) and plan to do it ASAP. In the released code there will be a new tracking method with new (better) results which will be also reflected on arxiv.

Thanks, looking forward to it! I will close this issue.

from gaussian-slam.

Hey there, you are completely right. Thanks a lot for pointing this out.

It is a copy-paste mistake on our writing side. Rendering performance on real-world datasets (TUM_RGB, Scannet) was never reported by previous methods. We pasted this text in all rendering tables hence the error. We will fix it, thanks again!

from gaussian-slam.

Hey there, you are completely right. Thanks a lot for pointing this out.

It is a copy-paste mistake on our writing side. Rendering performance on real-world datasets (TUM_RGB, Scannet) was never reported by previous methods. We pasted this text in all rendering tables hence the error. We will fix it, thanks again!

Thank you for your work! Could you please provide the tracking results of these methods on the ScanNet and TUM-RGBD datasets? Thanks!

from gaussian-slam.