[PRE REVIEW]: A graduate student-led participatory live-coding quantitative methods course in R: Experiences on initiating, developing, and teaching about jose-reviews HOT 37 CLOSED

@labarba, I should have some time next week, so count me in.

from jose-reviews.

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. @tracykteal it looks like you're currently assigned as the editor for this paper 🎉

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

What happens now?

This submission is currently in a pre-review state which means we are waiting for the assigned editor (@tracykteal) to find some reviewers for your submission. This may take anything between a few hours to a couple of weeks. Thanks for your patience 😸

You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here.

from jose-reviews.

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

from jose-reviews.

PDF failed to compile for issue #39 with the following error:

/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-50d5912cf72a/lib/whedon/orcid_validator.rb:12:in initialize': undefined method strip' for nil:NilClass (NoMethodError)
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-50d5912cf72a/lib/whedon.rb:91:in new' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-50d5912cf72a/lib/whedon.rb:91:in block in check_orcids'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-50d5912cf72a/lib/whedon.rb:89:in each' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-50d5912cf72a/lib/whedon.rb:89:in check_orcids'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-50d5912cf72a/lib/whedon.rb:70:in initialize' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-50d5912cf72a/lib/whedon/processor.rb:32:in new'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-50d5912cf72a/lib/whedon/processor.rb:32:in set_paper' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-50d5912cf72a/bin/whedon:52:in prepare'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/gems/thor-0.20.0/lib/thor/command.rb:27:in run' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/gems/thor-0.20.0/lib/thor/invocation.rb:126:in invoke_command'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/gems/thor-0.20.0/lib/thor.rb:387:in dispatch' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/gems/thor-0.20.0/lib/thor/base.rb:466:in start'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-50d5912cf72a/bin/whedon:113:in <top (required)>' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bin/whedon:23:in load'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bin/whedon:23:in `

from jose-reviews.

Hi @lwjohnst86 👋 — you are missing an ORCID for co-author Lindsay Coome.

from jose-reviews.

👋 @tracykteal — The submitting author requested you as handling author. Ping me if you have any issues!

from jose-reviews.

@whedon assign @tracykteal as editor

from jose-reviews.

OK, the editor is @tracykteal

from jose-reviews.

@labarba Do all authors need to have an ORCID? She doesn't have one.

from jose-reviews.

JOSE needs all authors to have an ORCID. Can you request that she get one?

from jose-reviews.

👋 @lwjohnst86 — Did you talk with your co-author about getting an ORCID? We'll need that to process the paper. Let us know!

from jose-reviews.

Yes, they finally responded just last night. I will updated now. I assume I just make that change to the repo and not have to make a new tag?

from jose-reviews.

Just make the change in the paper metadata! Then you can run @whedon generate pdf yourself to feel the power of our bot.

from jose-reviews.

@whedon generate pdf

from jose-reviews.

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

from jose-reviews.

👉 Check article proof 📄 👈

from jose-reviews.

Amazing!! Looks great 😄

from jose-reviews.

👋 @tracykteal — Any ideas for reviewers here?

from jose-reviews.

Thanks, I've sent out emails. Will add here once they respond.

from jose-reviews.

👋 Hi, just giving a ping to see what the progress is like. Thanks!

from jose-reviews.

Hi @tracykteal — this submission is waiting for you to assign reviewers for a while now. Can you update us on your status? Thanks!

from jose-reviews.

Any word on this? It's been a while.

from jose-reviews.

I've reached out to @tracykteal by email now. Thanks for the ping.

from jose-reviews.

👋 @k8hertweck — You signed up to review for JOSE a while back, marking R as language and biology as domain context ... could you have a look at this submission, and let me know if you'd be willing to contribute a review? Thank you!

from jose-reviews.

Hi, @jhollist — We're looking for reviewers for this JOSE submission, have a look! Might you be able to contribute here? Thank you! 🙏

from jose-reviews.

Maybe @jsta could help us out? We're in need of reviewers for this submission to JOSE. Have a look and let me know if you're up for it ... Merci! 😎

from jose-reviews.

@whedon assign @jhollist as reviewer

from jose-reviews.

OK, the reviewer is @jhollist

from jose-reviews.

Thank you, @jhollist — we're looking for a second reviewer, and we'll then start the review issue.

from jose-reviews.

@labarba @tracykteal I would be happy to help out on this one.

from jose-reviews.

Thank you, @MattForshaw !
I will add you now and start the review.

from jose-reviews.

@whedon add @MattForshaw as reviewer

from jose-reviews.

OK, @MattForshaw is now a reviewer

from jose-reviews.

@whedon assign @juanklopper as editor

from jose-reviews.

OK, the editor is @juanklopper

from jose-reviews.

@whedon start review

from jose-reviews.

OK, I've started the review over in #49. Feel free to close this issue now!

from jose-reviews.