Comments (22)
JasonJWilliamsNY
commented on June 24, 2024
1
Dear @nselem I'll pick this up this week apologies for the backlog.
from jose-reviews.
JasonJWilliamsNY
commented on June 24, 2024
1
@nselem checking in with @labarba to see if we can fast track or what form this will take since it has already undergone a level of review.
from jose-reviews.
JasonJWilliamsNY
commented on June 24, 2024
1
@nselem we will recruit a single reviewer so that we can move swiftly.
from jose-reviews.
JasonJWilliamsNY
commented on June 24, 2024
1
@whedon start review
from jose-reviews.
whedon
commented on June 24, 2024
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSE is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@whedon commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@whedon generate pdf
from jose-reviews.
whedon
commented on June 24, 2024
Wordcount for paper.md is 1504
from jose-reviews.
whedon
commented on June 24, 2024
Software report (experimental):
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.10 s (429.8 files/s, 41560.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Markdown 26 372 0 1427
Python 7 342 230 1063
TeX 1 22 0 233
R 4 52 39 161
YAML 3 30 54 126
make 1 28 29 67
JSON 1 0 0 57
Ruby 1 3 1 7
Bourne Shell 1 2 2 4
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 45 851 355 3145
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statistical information for the repository '142466472d99117b315936ea' was
gathered on 2023/04/12.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:
Author Commits Insertions Deletions % of changes
Andy Boughton 1 5 4 0.03
Francois Michonneau 1 2306 0 6.45
François Michonneau 5 22 130 0.43
Gabriel A. Devenyi 1 5 3 0.02
Greg Wilson 47 12802 13284 73.01
Joseph Stachelek 1 1 1 0.01
Katrin Leinweber 3 6 6 0.03
Maxim Belkin 14 55 55 0.31
Michael R. Crusoe 1 74 70 0.40
Raniere Silva 20 262 687 2.66
Rémi Emonet 2 49 17 0.18
Tracy Teal 4 3817 1950 16.14
W. Trevor King 1 0 1 0.00
William L. Close 3 53 56 0.31
naught101 1 4 2 0.02
Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:
Author Rows Stability Age % in comments
Andy Boughton 3 60.0 10.3 0.00
François Michonneau 95 431.8 9.8 0.00
Greg Wilson 506 4.0 32.1 11.26
Joseph Stachelek 1 100.0 10.2 0.00
Katrin Leinweber 1 16.7 10.0 0.00
Maxim Belkin 46 83.6 10.3 2.17
Michael R. Crusoe 62 83.8 11.2 4.84
Raniere Silva 58 22.1 13.4 10.34
Tracy Teal 873 22.9 20.1 12.37
naught101 1 25.0 16.3 0.00
from jose-reviews.
whedon
commented on June 24, 2024
👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈
from jose-reviews.
whedon
commented on June 24, 2024
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201629272 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 is OK
- 10.5281/ZENODO.3585993 is OK
- 10.1101/2021.06.17.448726 is OK
- 10.1101/2021.06.15.448091 is OK
- 10.21105/jose.00049 is OK
- 10.7554/eLife.49816 is OK
- 10.5281/ZENODO.3260309 is OK
- 10.3389/fmicb.2020.578600 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- 10.21105/jose.00049 may be a valid DOI for title: A graduate student-led participatory live-coding quantitative methods course in R: Experiences on initiating, developing, and teaching
- 10.21105/jose.00027 may be a valid DOI for title: An Introduction to Applied Bioinformatics: a free, open, and interactive text.
- 10.21105/jose.00021 may be a valid DOI for title: CFD Python: the 12 steps to Navier-Stokes equations
- 10.3389/fmicb.2020.578600 may be a valid DOI for title: A Curricular Bioinformatics Approach to Teaching Undergraduates to Analyze Metagenomic Datasets Using R
- 10.1002/bmb.21387 may be a valid DOI for title: Incubators: Building community networks and developing open educational resources to integrate bioinformatics into life science education
- 10.1525/abt.2021.83.1.33 may be a valid DOI for title: Introducing Python Programming into Undergraduate Biology
INVALID DOIs
- None
from jose-reviews.
labarba
commented on June 24, 2024
Note: This metagenomics learning module has been peer reviewed by The Carpentries in the issue: carpentries-lab/reviews#11 (comment)
from jose-reviews.
labarba
commented on June 24, 2024
@whedon invite @JasonJWilliamsNY as editor
from jose-reviews.
whedon
commented on June 24, 2024
@JasonJWilliamsNY has been invited to edit this submission.
from jose-reviews.
nselem
commented on June 24, 2024
Hello @JasonJWilliamsNY
What about PaulaNietoG and fpsom, as reviewers, since they were the reviewers of the lesson, it could be easy for them to review the article.
from jose-reviews.
JasonJWilliamsNY
commented on June 24, 2024
@labarba I can reach out - This does not show up in my dashboard on the Jose website.
from jose-reviews.
labarba
commented on June 24, 2024
you need to accept the editor invitation first, with: @whedon assign me as editor
from jose-reviews.
JasonJWilliamsNY
commented on June 24, 2024
@whedon assign me as editor
from jose-reviews.
whedon
commented on June 24, 2024
OK, the editor is @JasonJWilliamsNY
from jose-reviews.
nselem
commented on June 24, 2024
Dear @JasonJWilliamsNY @whedon and @labarba
I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to kindly inquire about the status of our article. I was wondering if the manuscript has been assigned to reviewers for the peer-review process yet. Any update on the progress of the review process would be greatly appreciated. We are excited about this manuscript.
Thank you for your time and assistance.
Best regards,
from jose-reviews.
nselem
commented on June 24, 2024
Thanks @JasonJWilliamsNY yes, the lesson has been thoroughly reviewed, but the short paper describing it is not. That's what I was thinking that maybe PaulaNietoG and fpsom the reviewers of the lesson could review the manuscript. Or maybe other reviewers but pointing them to the previous review link here: The Carpentries issue: carpentries-lab/reviews#11 (comment)
from jose-reviews.
JasonJWilliamsNY
commented on June 24, 2024
@whedon add @enkera as reviewer
from jose-reviews.
whedon
commented on June 24, 2024
OK, @enkera is now a reviewer
from jose-reviews.
whedon
commented on June 24, 2024
OK, I've started the review over in #209.
from jose-reviews.
Related Issues (20)
- [PRE REVIEW]: Good Enough Practices in Scientific Computing: A Learning Module for Researchers HOT 18
- [PRE REVIEW]: CodeBuddy: A programming assignment management system for short-form exercises HOT 10
- [PRE REVIEW]: Learning Machine Learning with Lorenz-96 HOT 22
- [PRE REVIEW]: Can you predict the future? A tutorial for the National Ecological Observatory Network Ecological Forecasting Challenge HOT 7
- [PRE REVIEW]: Self-Guided Decision Support Groundwater Modelling with Python HOT 20
- [PRE REVIEW]: The University of Toronto Climate Downscaling Workflow: Tools and Resources for Climate Change Impact Analysis HOT 47
- [PRE REVIEW]: Practical machine learning with PyTorch HOT 25
- [PRE REVIEW]: An R reproducibility toolkit for the practical researcher HOT 17
- [PRE REVIEW]: Course Materials for an Introduction to Bayesian Modeling in Spanish HOT 5
- [PRE REVIEW]: Static Equilibrium in Remote Alaska HOT 13
- [REVIEW]: Practical machine learning with PyTorch HOT 79
- [REVIEW]: Self-Guided Decision Support Groundwater Modelling with Python HOT 14
- [REVIEW]: Learning Machine Learning with Lorenz-96 HOT 21
- [REVIEW]: Scientific programming in Julia - An introductory course HOT 9
- [REVIEW]: The University of Toronto Climate Downscaling Workflow: Tools and Resources for Climate Change Impact Analysis HOT 23
- JOSE Review - comments on "Self-Guided Decision Support Groundwater Modelling with Python " [Documentation section] HOT 2
- JOSE Review - comments on "Self-Guided Decision Support Groundwater Modelling with Python " [Pedagogy / Instructional design ] HOT 2
- JOSE Review - comments on "Self-Guided Decision Support Groundwater Modelling with Python " [JOSE paper] HOT 2
- [PRE REVIEW]: An open-sourced comprehensive Monte-Carlo-aided educational toolkit for statistics HOT 6
- [PRE REVIEW]: ARC4CFD: Learning how to leverage High-Performance Computing with Computational Fluid Dynamics HOT 7
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from jose-reviews.