[PRE REVIEW]: ChooChoo the Checklist tool about jose-reviews HOT 33 CLOSED

@labarba - I have just returned from leave and would be happy to step up as editor for this (I have a passion for checklists...)

from jose-reviews.

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSE reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSE is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

from jose-reviews.

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1145/3159450.3159548 is OK
- 10.1145/3159450.3159548 is OK
- 10.14786/FLR.V2I1.24 is OK
- 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 is OK
- 10.1186/s12909-022-03632-z is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

from jose-reviews.

Wordcount for paper.md is 963

from jose-reviews.

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.06 s (670.3 files/s, 47045.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Markdown                        24            465              0            886
Python                          12            249            162            676
YAML                             4             96              5            408
TeX                              1              4              0             55
JavaScript                       1              0              0              6
TOML                             1              0              0              6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            43            814            167           2037
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository '82ca687c05d8d1f8a6efbeb4' was
gathered on 2023/03/16.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
Lucy Whalley                   248          2536           1321           99.87
choochoo-bot                     1             4              1            0.13

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
Lucy Whalley               1090           43.0         11.2                7.98
choochoo-bot                  3           75.0         10.4                0.00

from jose-reviews.

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

from jose-reviews.

@whedon list commands

from jose-reviews.

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@whedon commands

from jose-reviews.

@whedon commands

from jose-reviews.

Here are some things you can ask me to do:

# List Whedon's capabilities
@whedon commands

# List of editor GitHub usernames
@whedon list editors

# List of reviewers together with programming language preferences and domain expertise
@whedon list reviewers

EDITORIAL TASKS

# Compile the paper
@whedon generate pdf

# Compile the paper from alternative branch
@whedon generate pdf from branch custom-branch-name

# Ask Whedon to check the references for missing DOIs
@whedon check references

# Ask Whedon to check repository statistics for the submitted software
@whedon check repository

from jose-reviews.

@whedon generate pdf

from jose-reviews.

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

from jose-reviews.

Hello! A note on reviewers...as this is a domain agnostic tool I think the possible reviewer list is quite broad. Familiarity with Github, Github actions and Python would certainly be useful - and reviewers who uses Github for hosting teaching content might be best as they might have a better appreciation for the project motivation. Looking at the spreadsheet - possible reviewers might be: lechten gcdeshpande mattforshaw stefania11

from jose-reviews.

@whedon invite @diazrenata as editor

from jose-reviews.

@diazrenata has been invited to edit this submission.

from jose-reviews.

@diazrenata Have a look at this submission 👀
Would you be available to edit this? I realize you're more of an R person than Python, but the functionality here is mostly around GitHub... let me know what you think (feel free to ping me on Slack).

from jose-reviews.

Hello @labarba @diazrenata, just a quick message to say let me know if there is anything I can do to help things move along 🚀

from jose-reviews.

I could potentially act as a reviewer for this, if it is at all helpful!

from jose-reviews.

Thank you, @ppxasjsm — that is most helpful. @diazrenata stepped down as editor, and so we need to find an alternative handling editor. Stay tuned.

from jose-reviews.

@ShanEllis — would you accept handling this submission as editor? (We have one volunteer to review, yay!)

from jose-reviews.

Hello, just giving this a little ping @labarba @ShanEllis let me know if there is anything I can help with to move things along

from jose-reviews.

Awesome, thank you! FYI, JOSE has been upgraded to the latest more powerful bot: @editorialbot — I myself haven't had a chance to try it yet, so here goes...

from jose-reviews.

@editorialbot assign @ttimbers as editor

from jose-reviews.

Assigned! @ttimbers is now the editor

from jose-reviews.

@ppxasjsm – You had volunteered to contribute a review for JOSE back in May. Are you still able to do it? We've assigned an editor who will look for a second reviewer before starting the Review issue.

from jose-reviews.

@editorialbot add @LittleAprilFool as reviewer

from jose-reviews.

@LittleAprilFool added to the reviewers list!

from jose-reviews.

Hello @ttimbers @LittleAprilFool @ppxasjsm

Awkward timing but I am on Annual Leave until the 8th of August (without any internet)!

Hope that works ok with the review process. I will check in on this ASAP after getting back from camping.

Best,

Lucy

from jose-reviews.

@editorialbot add @ggeorg02 as reviewer

from jose-reviews.

@ggeorg02 added to the reviewers list!

from jose-reviews.

@editorialbot start review

from jose-reviews.

OK, I've started the review over in #220.

from jose-reviews.

Sorry I missed this, not sure why I didn't get an email notification with me mentioned specifically. I can still review, but I see you have now already found two willing people!

from jose-reviews.