Bug Description

When following the install instructions for @basemaps/sprites, you get an unusable install

Steps to Reproduce

Steps to reproduce the behavior:

1. npm install @basemaps/sprites
2. node_modules/.bin/basemaps-sprites

You get the error

internal/process/esm_loader.js:74
    internalBinding('errors').triggerUncaughtException(
                              ^

Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find package 'fs' imported from /home/pnorman/spirit/node_modules/@basemaps/sprites/build/cli.js
    at packageResolve (internal/modules/esm/resolve.js:664:9)
    at moduleResolve (internal/modules/esm/resolve.js:705:18)
    at Loader.defaultResolve [as _resolve] (internal/modules/esm/resolve.js:798:11)
    at Loader.resolve (internal/modules/esm/loader.js:100:40)
    at Loader.getModuleJob (internal/modules/esm/loader.js:246:28)
    at ModuleWrap.<anonymous> (internal/modules/esm/module_job.js:47:40)
    at link (internal/modules/esm/module_job.js:46:36) {
  code: 'ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND'
}

Versions installed are

npm list
spirit@ /home/pnorman/spirit
└── @basemaps/[email protected]

User Story

Might be useful for Geopandas users to have LINZ services pre-configured here: geopandas/xyzservices#153

Acceptance Criteria

• ...
• ...
• ...

Add an Assignee, Milestone, Release and any relevant Labels.

User Story

In order to validate our tile delivery platform as a developer I want to be able to load sentinel imagery tiles in QGIS.

Acceptance Criteria

• Store COG somewhere
• Query which COG tile to get from Sentinel
• Tiles delivered by XYZ
• webmercator
• User can pan and zoom
• Faster than 500ms

User Story

In order to build the tileset from scratch as a member of the public I need to know what steps are required.

Acceptance Criteria

• where to source the data (such as the address points etc.)
• which commands to run
• an expectation of the running time and resource requirements.
• an estimation of the output tileset size (for disk allocation)

Bug Description

Header and footer components breaking on Safari (see screenshots below)
Chrome & Firefox looks as intended.

Steps to Reproduce

Steps to reproduce the behavior:

1. Go to 'https://basemaps.linz.govt.nz/'
2. See error

Desktop

• Environment: macOS 11.0 Big Sur Beta (20A5354i)
• Relevant Software Versions: Safari Version 14.0 (16610.1.25.1.3)

Also tested on macOS Catalina 10.15.6 [latest public build] & Safari Version 14.0 (15610.1.23, 15610) same issue.

Screenshots

Safari — 

Chrome —

Add an Assignee, Milestone, Release and any relevant Labels.

User Story

In order to have a repository that complies with contributing guidelines as a Basemaps Developer I want a detailed Read Me for the repository
(optional: instead of [existing behaviour]).

Acceptance Criteria

• Contain the license
• Features, components, database
• Introduction to the project
• Use buildings repo readme as a good example template https://github.com/linz/nz-buildings/blob/master/README.rst

Add an Assignee, Milestone, Release and any relevant Labels.

Bug Description

When executing docker build -t basemap Dockerfile I get an error with eslint

Steps to Reproduce

Execute docker build command

Desktop

• Environment: Windows

Screenshots

Bug Description

When master has been merged with no code changes the deployment process fails with

 Update to resource type AWS::Lambda::Version is not supported.

Steps to Reproduce

Steps to reproduce the behavior:

1. Merge a commit to the master branch with no code changes
2. Watch Build pipeline

User Story

In order to see a more detailed view of the terrain as a user I want to be able to see contours in more detail
instead of the current system, where 20m contours are only visible from zoom level 14, and 100m contours are only visible from zoom level 11.

Acceptance Criteria

The current behaviour could stay the same, but it would be great if the tiles included contours slightly more zoomed out - currently the data isn't as useful as the Topo50 series because its hard to get an idea of the steepness of various bits of terrain.

Basemaps	Topo Series

In each case, the Topo50/Topo250 map shows significantly more elevation detail. If the tiles included this data (but didn't render it) we could customize how detailed the contours should be at each zoom level. Potentially, this could be controlled via some query parameters?

User Story

In order to have a visually appealing basemap as a user I want some bathymetry.

@JBLINZ TO UPDATE ISSUE

Acceptance Criteria

• Bathy COG
• GebCo bathy cog added to Basemap Dev
• ...

User Story

In order to build a high traffic map-based application (web/mobile) that uses LINZ tiles, as an application developer I want to be able to self-host the Web Mercator output tilesets on my own infrastructure.
(instead of trying to figure out how to build the outputs from this GitHub repo).

I'm sure there could be use cases where developers may want to customise the output, but I suspect most will be happy to consume what you're currently producing.

Acceptance Criteria

• Can conveniently get access to the download the output tileset as a single large file, e.g., a pmtiles file (the pmtiles format can bundle both vector and raster tiles). For reference, see this publically available repository containing OSM vector data in pmtiles format
• If not pmtiles format, would be useful to have documentation regarding how to do format shifting.
• ...

Add an Assignee, Milestone, Release and any relevant Labels.

User Story

In order to [accomplish goal] as a [role] I want [capability]
(optional: instead of [existing behaviour]).

Acceptance Criteria

• ...
• ...
• ...

Add an Assignee, Milestone, Release and any relevant Labels.

User Story

In order to have a complete Basemap dataset as a Doug(persona) I want to be able to transition between imagery datasets in QGIS .

Acceptance Criteria

• merge Datasets together
• zoom scale
• definition of rule system (image metadata/layer priority)
• Sentinal to Gisborne Rural Imagery
• Rural needs to be COG'd
• Needs to work in QGIS