First stable release about rio HOT 6 CLOSED

Alright, all blockers are resolved, I'll be making a release soon.

from rio.

I think that's it for the first stable release. If anyone has anything else they think needs to be addressed, now's the time to bring it up!

from rio.

from rio.

Your call on whether we stick with raw democracy on the import names, but I'm going to voice my view that it's worth looking at motivation as well. I expect favor for very short names to be partly composed of inertia, and since this is just a style guide feature (nobody's existing or future code will ever be broken by the import names Rio recommends), I feel it may be worth bucking tradition if all the direct Rio contributors agree that something more explicit is better practice. Bottom line, users who actively despise our choices will just stick with their own; we might as well aim for improvement otherwise.

BTW a branch of this topic is, do we also suggest unqualified imports for infix operators?

from rio.

Fair enough, and I suppose the only competing proposal which approaches "standard" level is full qualification, which I think the majority will rebel against. Including me, TBH. :) I'll bring up infix on #12.

from rio.

• #72
• #73
• #78

Not as important but good to consider before the release:

• #74
• #75

from rio.