PPC-SAFT Database Butene Isomer Parameters about clapeyron.jl HOT 6 OPEN

Oh, I see, they got mixed, same thing happened with decalin before, this just slipped out of my sight

from clapeyron.jl.

Ah ok fair enough - thank you for replying so quickly. I think I also found another one: cis-2-pentene (line 630 in the Clapeyron CSV) is labelled as 2-pentene

from clapeyron.jl.

Hi, to avoid confusion, can I suggest using the acronym PCP-SAFT for the version based on the dipolar term by Gross and Vrabec (and used by Esper et al.)? There is also a PPC-SAFT out there that is mainly developed by the groups of de Hemptinne and NguyenHuynh but that uses a different term for polar contributions.

from clapeyron.jl.

Hi, I knew there was a difference between PCP and PPC SAFT but I always assumed the Gross version was PPC since it just sounds more "correct"? I think there's also quite a few different implementations of "Polar PC-SAFT" beyond just Gross, de Hemptinne and NguyenHuynh (I think Chapman has his own?).

As an aside: have you benchmarked the dipole-quadrupole term in feos? The coefficients don't quite look the same as in the paper and there's an additional pi^2 in front of the a_3 term. The tests don't seem to cover this term and the original paper doesn't provide the parameters needed to reproduce the results.

from clapeyron.jl.

The dipole-quadrupole term is a bit of an issue in feos as well, because we are not sure whether the only reference implementation that we have is correct. The issue with the pi^2 should be clear though: It can either be absorbed in the correlation integral parameters (which would lead to a deviation close to factor 10) or left there as prefactor in a_3.

from clapeyron.jl.

On the PPCSAFT vs PCPSAFT naming issue, we can just add an alias that makes those equivalent in the meanwhile.

from clapeyron.jl.