Giter Club home page Giter Club logo

Comments (10)

muhlemmer avatar muhlemmer commented on August 19, 2024 1

Yes, I wrote I agree ;)

from oidc.

hifabienne avatar hifabienne commented on August 19, 2024

Thank you for sharing your idea.
If there is a significant demand from customers/community, we will carefully consider implementing the feature.
Currently, the issue will be added to our product backlog.

Meanwhile, if you're interested in implementing it yourself, we also welcome pull requests.

from oidc.

muhlemmer avatar muhlemmer commented on August 19, 2024

The standard is a bit fishy on this.

it SHOULD NOT have a nonce Claim, even when the ID Token issued at the time of the original authentication contained nonce; however, if it is present, its value MUST be the same as in the ID Token issued at the time of the original authentication

Disable is indeed the easy solution, but not necessary the correct one. If we want to be 100% correct we should verify the nonce against the original ID Token, if it was returned with the new ID token. So in case of Entra ID you could work-around the issue by constructing the RP with the WithNonce verrifier option, passed to WithVerifierOpts. Then, when calling RefreshTokens use context Values to set and obtain the Nonce from the original token.

from oidc.

jkroepke avatar jkroepke commented on August 19, 2024

The standard also says (Section 12.2)

12.2. Successful Refresh Response
Upon successful validation of the Refresh Token, the response body is the Token Response of Section 3.1.3.3 except that it might not contain an id_token.
...
it SHOULD NOT have a nonce Claim, even when the ID Token issued at the time of the original authentication contained nonce; however, if it is present, its value MUST be the same as in the ID Token issued at the time of the original authentication

My problem is according the standard, its compliant to omit the nonce claim, too. In this case, I need a verifier which accepts both: an empty string and the nonce claim from the original ID Token.

In my case, I support any OIDC provider and I have different results from Entra ID. While on my test, the nonce is empty, other users experience that error that nonce is non-empty.

Would it be an option to check the nonce only, if its non-empty? That would be 100% correct, because it says check nonce only, if present.

from oidc.

jkroepke avatar jkroepke commented on August 19, 2024

I also tried something like this:

    ctx = context.WithValue(ctx, types.CtxNonce{}, "value")
	newTokens, err := rp.RefreshTokens[*oidc.IDTokenClaims](ctx, relyingParty, refreshToken, "", "")
	if errors.Is(err, oidc.ErrNonceInvalid) {
		ctx = context.WithValue(ctx, types.CtxNonce{}, "")
		newTokens, err = rp.RefreshTokens[*oidc.IDTokenClaims](ctx, relyingParty, refreshToken, "", "")
	}

but it fails, if the Provider has a one time usage policy for refresh tokens.

from oidc.

jkroepke avatar jkroepke commented on August 19, 2024

@muhlemmer what did you think about empty nonce value is fine on refresh?

from oidc.

muhlemmer avatar muhlemmer commented on August 19, 2024

Sorry lost track of this issue. With the above arguments you gave I agree that we can allow an empty nonce. Do you want to send a PR for that?

from oidc.

jkroepke avatar jkroepke commented on August 19, 2024

With the above arguments you gave I agree that we can allow an empty nonce

Its spec compliant. If you read (Section 12.2):

Token from Refresh Response SHOULD NOT have a nonce Claim, however, if it is present, its value MUST be the same as in the ID Token issued at the time of the original authentication

which I interpret: claims from refresh response should be empty/non present. If not empty, the values should be equal to the initial value.

If you would agree here, I would open a PR

from oidc.

jkroepke avatar jkroepke commented on August 19, 2024

I looked into it and since the ValidToken function does not know the context of the token source (comming from CodeExchange or Refresh), I have no clue how I could integrate a condition without changing the signature

from oidc.

muhlemmer avatar muhlemmer commented on August 19, 2024

I looked into it and since the ValidToken function does not know the context of the token source (comming from CodeExchange or Refresh), I have no clue how I could integrate a condition without changing the signature

You can open a breaking change PR against the next branch. And I can have a look if there is a solution to port it to main.

from oidc.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.