Autoprefixer about aybolit HOT 5 CLOSED

Autoprefixer is generally not needed for modern browsers supported by Aybolit, except for certain properties like user-select and -webkit-appearance, and I prefer listing these explicitly.

Scss is just a personal preference. I'm ok with PostCSS too, just don't know if it would improve compilation time significantly (dart-sass should be fast, too).

from aybolit.

My recommendation is using PostCSS with postcss-preset-env. It gives you a solid platform for both future-forward and bleeding edge features, and proper backwards compat when needed.

from aybolit.

I'm back from my vacation and doing some cleanup here, so let me close this issue per above comment. You can switch to precss in your projects if you wish, but I'm going to keep Sass for now.

from aybolit.

WordPress/gutenberg#14801 very interesting in-depth discussion wrt SASS vs PostCSS

@mor10 quote

From my perspective this is about setting the stage for future development. Sass sits firmly anchored in the past and old best-practices. Building it into tooling at this stage suggests to users that Sass is a viable path forward. That would be unfortunate since modern CSS with the assistance of PostCSS is the official path forward for the web platform. Building in further reliance on Sass at this point holds us back from what's happening elsewhere.

from aybolit.

Thanks for the input, but please keep in mind the following:

1. This project doesn't need the various capacities of PostCSS. What we really need here are variables (used in combination with custom CSS properties) and loops.

2. Keeping the .scss source makes it clear that these files are not supposed to be used directly.

from aybolit.