Would be great if in the first page of the documentation you could state how this project compares with canopy, why should people use it instead? Thanks

I currently use Canopy tests. For Marquee:

• Is there integration to Canopy, or a conversion path from Canopy tests to Marquee tests?
• More documentation? Canopy is already having quite good documentation. :-)

#1 raised the idea of conversion from canopy. Docs on what the obstacles are would be excellent.

Ryan and I were discussing the possibility of using a computation expression in a test.

I think the code would look like

browser {
  Click ".class"
  Displayed ".class"
}

Creating this issue as a feature reminder 👍

A type provider that takes a url, reads the source, parses for the attributes 'data-uia-', and generates a type of all the possible css selectors for a page would be sick!

pseudo-code for a page that has the tag <div data-uia-username="fakeName"></div>

type samplePage = AutomationTypeProvider<url = "github.com">
displayed samplePage.username
printf samplePage.username.content //prints fakeName