Team's Response

Should be purely cosmetic.

Items for the Tester to Verify

❓ Issue severity

Team chose [severity.VeryLow]
Originally [severity.Low]

• I disagree

Reason for disagreement: The use of the emphasis (bold, italics, markdown) was quite prevalent throughout the whole DG, especially markdown since many classes were mentioned in the DG. As the DG is extremely wordy and content-heavy, the use of emphasis is crucial in making the document more digestible for readers.
For example, bold text may signal to readers that the section bolded contains important information for future developers, while italics may represent terms that will be defined in the glossary. However, I believe that the emphasis is meaningless without any context, and in this case, the team did not provide readers with the necessary explanation of the emphasis used. Readers may potentially miss out on certain important details, and may also get confused by the different text styles.

Hence, I stand by my original severity level of severity.Low as this is not a mere cosmetic bug, it in fact affects the reader experience due to the reasons mentioned.

from pe.