The ODT example mentions DOIs and shows best practices whereas the LaTeX example does not.
It would be nice to have an example like the others, e. g.

  \bibitem{item:1-1}
  A.~Alpha and B.~T.~Beta, “An interesting paper”,
  in \textit{Proc. 1st Int. Particle Accelerator Conf. (IPAC’10)},
  Kyoto, Japan, May 2010, 
  paper MOP057, pp. 567--569,
  \texttt{doi:~10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2010-MOP057}
\\
  \textcolor{jgreen}{[Conference Proceedings, two authors; optional paper ID; optional DOI]}

The package on CTAN is dated newer than the master branch of this repository and is not in sync with it. The JACoW on the other hand links to both sources.

Expected behaviour:
This repository is at least as new as CTAN and there are stable things (tags/releases/branches) that correspond to CTAN.