Or should they also go to someone like a trusted friend, family member, lawyer, or accountant?

If someone else gets the accountings, it can be a good way to protect against abuse.

They are a different group of people. There can always be multiple attorneys in fact, and there can be successors.

• Update this repo description using the following template:
  A Docassemble interview for the [JURISDICTION] [FORM TITLE]
• If this interview is live, add the URL where it can be found. If not, create a new issue to discuss what needs to happen with it.
• Add a topic tag for the jurisdiction (i.e., Massachusetts)
• Add interview-upkeep.yml workflow file to .github/workflows and commit it.
• Update the README introduction using the following template:
  Title: A Docassemble interview for the [JURISDICTION] [FORM TITLE]
  Body: This is a Docassemble interview to complete the [JURISDICTION] [FORMS] forms online. The live interview can be found at [URL].

1. Is it for you or not?
2. What is your name, address
3. Names of the people granted power now
4. Names of the successors

NOTE: the attorneys in fact can act together (consensus) or independently.

If you choose to allow your attorneys-in-fact to exercise their powers independently, they do not have to communicate with each other when they transfer money, personal property, real estate, and so on.
If you wish that your attorneys-in-fact work together, each attorney-in-fact must agree upon decisions about banking, real estate, and/or personal property issues.
This option may be best if your attorneys-in-fact keep good lines of communication open and if they have your best wishes at heart.

The person granting the powers needs to be competent and over 18

In that situation, all boxes are checked. There's just an extra checked box that verifies they really mean everything