According to prompt given to Model "DONT ANSWER IF YOU ARE ASKED MORDERN DAY TECH QUESTIOS", the model should not return modern day solutions.

Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Start up environment and Ask the following:

Expected behavior
To be determined by the Owner

Encountered the following error: 'An error occurred: string indices must be integers, not 'str'', on entering a prompt in the GeetaGPT.
A screenshot to show the error is attached below.
I used Brave Browser on the Microsoft Windows 11 Pro (Version = 10.0.22631 Build 22631) Operating System for running the web application locally.
I installed the required versions of OpenAI and Flask frameworks and it doesn't seem to cause conflicts with the Python version 3.11.7 as of now.
Can you please assign addressing this issue to me, to start off with my contribution in the project? @subh05sus

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

• I would like to create a back to top arrow button for the website.
• Responsive for any type of devices.
• Hovering with neon light effect.
• Best user experience with smooth scroll functioning.
• Helpful for the user to reach out to the top of the website in one click.

Describe the bug

• There are so many errors in the website.
• Website is not designed properly.
• Irregular syntaxing.
• Wrong, improper and unusual code.

To Reproduce

• I will resolve the errors and fixing the syntax of the code.
• Making the code clean and consice to understand betterly.
• Using new syntax for the elements to render.

Expected behavior

• Make website clean and refactor again.

Screenshots

Desktop (please complete the following information):

• OS: Windows 11
• Browser: Microsoft Edge.
• Version: Latest Version.

According to Open AI's website, the model used "text-davinci-003" will Retired from 04 Jan 2024. Refer to website https://platform.openai.com/docs/deprecations

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

The repository contains code in javascript and python, it does not have workflow for code scanning.

Describe the solution you'd like

I want to add the codeql workflow to automate security checks. CodeQL is the code analysis engine developed by GitHub to identify vulnerabilities in code. It will analyze your code and display the results as code scanning alerts. It will be enabled on every push, commit and pull request using GitHub actions.

Record

• I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct 
• I'm a SWOC 4.0 contributor
• I want to work on this issue

Normally when empty input can leads to errors when we are using and LLM so its better to add this feature

issue templates for your project like,

Styling Request
Documentation Request
Bug Report
New Features Request, etc.
This will help contributors and maintainers both to segregate which are related either styling, new features, bug, etc.

When we hit the enter button, it should trigger the "Ask Question" button but it's currently not:)

The program does not give reply from GPT 3.5.

The program is not configured yet to answer anything properly.

How to reproduce.
Just setup the environment as per Readme, and give the first Question

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...]

Describe the solution you'd like
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.

Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...]

Describe the solution you'd like
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.
I would like to add scaling feature in deploy button , so that when we click on that it will scale up and looks great.

Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

• I would like to create a contributing guidelines readme file which contains all the guildelines of contributing in this github repository.

Describe the solution you'd like

• By creating Contributing Guidelines Readme file, this will be very helpful to the newbie in the open-source world.

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...]

Describe the solution you'd like
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.

Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

Describe the feature

This issue addresses the need for a GitHub Actions workflow that automatically assigns reviewers to pull requests upon their opening. Automating the reviewer assignment process will streamline code review processes and ensure timely feedback from team members.

Proposed Feature:

The proposed feature involves the creation of a GitHub Actions workflow that triggers upon the opening of a pull request. This workflow will automatically assign designated reviewers based on predefined list of reviewers in the workflow config.

Expected Behavior:

• When a pull request is opened, the workflow should trigger automatically.
• Based on defined rules or configurations, reviewers will be assigned to the pull request.
• Reviewer assignments should be customizable and adaptable to project-specific requirements.

Benefits:

• Streamlines the code review process by automating reviewer assignments.
• Ensures timely feedback and reduces bottlenecks in the development workflow.
• Improves collaboration and accountability among team members.

Record

• I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct
• I'm a SWOC24 contributor
• I want to work on this issue