Giter Club home page Giter Club logo

silo's People

Contributors

kohler avatar nathanielherman avatar stephentu avatar

Stargazers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

Watchers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

silo's Issues

commit TIDs use the wrong epoch number

In order to capture anti-dependencies, it is necessary for commit TID generation to use the current global epoch, not the worker's local epoch. Here is an example why (thanks to eddie for the counter-example):

(1) t1 begins in epoch 0
(2) t1 writes x => version 1 (in write set only)
(3) epoch changes to 1
(4) t2 reads x @ version 0
(5) t2 writes y
(6) t2 commits in epoch 1
(7) t1 commits in epoch 0.

The fix is easy, but I will not apply it until after the camera ready is submitted.

about silo OCC's writeset lock

There are serveral question's about silo's OCC writeset lock during commit time.
1, Is the lock always set to true when the tuple is a inserted one?
2, If tuples are modified ones, are there any locks during commit time? Does Silo create a new version in thread-or-numanode local memory and update the index?

‘is_layer’ member issue

Hi,
I followed the readme file and I keep getting this message while trying to compile the benchmark.

btree_impl.h:213:7: error: ‘struct btree<testing_concurrent_btree_traits>::leaf_node’ has no member named ‘is_layer’

Any ideas ?

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.