stakewithus / defi-by-example Goto Github PK

Python 22.28% Solidity 46.11% JavaScript 31.61%

defi-by-example's Introduction

Install

# install vyper
virtualenv -p python3 venv
source venv/bin/activate
pip install vyper

cp .env.sample .env

For windows

virtualenv -p python3 venv
venv\Scripts\activate
pip install vyper

To run

venv\Scripts\activate
truffle compile

Test

source .env

# using infura.io
npx ganache-cli \
--fork https://mainnet.infura.io/v3/$WEB3_INFURA_PROJECT_ID \
--unlock $WETH_WHALE \
--unlock $DAI_WHALE \
--unlock $USDC_WHALE \
--unlock $USDT_WHALE \
--unlock $WBTC_WHALE \
--networkId 999

# using archivenode.io (limit 10 req / sec)
## fork at block
BLOCK=11597142
ARCHIVE_NODE_URL=https://api.archivenode.io/$ARCHIVE_NODE_API_KEY@$BLOCK
## latest block
ARCHIVE_NODE_URL=https://api.archivenode.io/$ARCHIVE_NODE_API_KEY

ganache-cli \
--fork $ARCHIVE_NODE_URL \
--unlock $WETH_WHALE \
--unlock $DAI_WHALE \
--unlock $USDC_WHALE \
--unlock $USDT_WHALE \
--unlock $WBTC_WHALE \
--networkId 999

# run test
env $(cat .env) npx truffle test --network mainnet_fork test/test-erc20.js
env $(cat .env) npx truffle test --network mainnet_fork test/test-dydx-solo-margin.js

defi-by-example's People

Contributors

Stargazers

Watchers

Forkers

bernardchooo ertoba fraznaveed yaiba arkantos1482 cryptoleek-team souvik19mukherjee83 cryptoleek-eth sandymandy12 autotradingpro schizophrend6 cory-sydn stevyhacker litsummer trotsky94 dracmic amorfatii robin-liyong warlord-dev korrio li-by witwiki devdomsos shivamdev31 tiaan-r prayagsingh woods1060 percipientcapital christophercelaya jc-55 gaslimitreached marce1994 frankloud bonoyang shishirhome dog-verao stawankaman avenbreaks simuty javac2021 imef-femi lidashu emmanuel-umeh masehdh shaqichen cositotito 50shades0fshay aindrajaya joe-nano whoami2323 asim07 theiceeman akhdaniel markus851 flashinthepan brianp078 pguso prisius fsociety88 sathwiq bestofkay sauravs takassh kaleb-keny bbenzikry 0xcucu nazifberat robert604 crypto-addicto emma66886 ekami 0xm00neth ohhkaneda debox103 0xpr0f andrus123 sebastienbosca tanjinalam mohammadreza-ashouri extreme007 mahmoudc focus-com alphadataomega dthauit cryptoapplepie satdevops88 0xbageltoes jeevasathyatheesars full-stack-web-dev-bd realcheapfly sujine2 ronghcm900 anysou kippis-research lignyxg singh1aryan karacurt zz-my-coder evzpav peacebeuponu94

defi-by-example's Issues

yearn vault

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x6dc268706818d1e6503739950abc5ba2211fc6b451e54244da7b1e226b12e027

https://www.rekt.news/post/yearn-rekt/

https://github.com/iearn-finance/yearn-security/blob/master/disclosures/2020-10-30.md

1/ Flash loaned 116k ETH from dYdX
2/ Flash loaned 99k ETH from Aave v2
3/ Borrow 134M USDC and 129M DAI using ETH as collateral on Compound
4/ Add 134M USDC and 36M DAI to 3crv Curve pool
5/ Withdraw 165M USDT from 3crv Curve pool
6/ Repeat five timesDown pointing backhand index

Deposit 93M DAI to yDAI vault (less w/ each time)
Add 165M USDT to 3crv pool
Withdraw 92M DAI from yDAI vault (less w/ each time)
Withdraw 165M USDT from 3crv pool
7/ In the last time withdraw 39M DAI and 134M USDC instead USDT
8/ Repay Compound debts
9/ Repay flash loans

why is this 0?

https://github.com/t4sk/defi-by-example/blob/1afbd420bdd91b48c764a678fbcca48426ae8d31/test/test-compound-erc20-borrow.js#L67-L72

This issue was generated by todo based on a `TODO` comment in `1afbd42`. It's been assigned to @t4sk because they committed the code.

flash mint full code

// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
pragma solidity ^0.8;

interface WETH10 {
  function flashLoan(
    address receiver,
    address token,
    uint value,
    bytes calldata data
  ) external returns (bool);
}


interface IERC20 {
    /**
     * @dev Returns the amount of tokens in existence.
     */
    function totalSupply() external view returns (uint256);

    /**
     * @dev Returns the amount of tokens owned by `account`.
     */
    function balanceOf(address account) external view returns (uint256);

    /**
     * @dev Moves `amount` tokens from the caller's account to `recipient`.
     *
     * Returns a boolean value indicating whether the operation succeeded.
     *
     * Emits a {Transfer} event.
     */
    function transfer(address recipient, uint256 amount) external returns (bool);

    /**
     * @dev Returns the remaining number of tokens that `spender` will be
     * allowed to spend on behalf of `owner` through {transferFrom}. This is
     * zero by default.
     *
     * This value changes when {approve} or {transferFrom} are called.
     */
    function allowance(address owner, address spender) external view returns (uint256);

    /**
     * @dev Sets `amount` as the allowance of `spender` over the caller's tokens.
     *
     * Returns a boolean value indicating whether the operation succeeded.
     *
     * IMPORTANT: Beware that changing an allowance with this method brings the risk
     * that someone may use both the old and the new allowance by unfortunate
     * transaction ordering. One possible solution to mitigate this race
     * condition is to first reduce the spender's allowance to 0 and set the
     * desired value afterwards:
     * https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/20#issuecomment-263524729
     *
     * Emits an {Approval} event.
     */
    function approve(address spender, uint256 amount) external returns (bool);

    /**
     * @dev Moves `amount` tokens from `sender` to `recipient` using the
     * allowance mechanism. `amount` is then deducted from the caller's
     * allowance.
     *
     * Returns a boolean value indicating whether the operation succeeded.
     *
     * Emits a {Transfer} event.
     */
    function transferFrom(
        address sender,
        address recipient,
        uint256 amount
    ) external returns (bool);

    /**
     * @dev Emitted when `value` tokens are moved from one account (`from`) to
     * another (`to`).
     *
     * Note that `value` may be zero.
     */
    event Transfer(address indexed from, address indexed to, uint256 value);

    /**
     * @dev Emitted when the allowance of a `spender` for an `owner` is set by
     * a call to {approve}. `value` is the new allowance.
     */
    event Approval(address indexed owner, address indexed spender, uint256 value);
}


contract TestWethFlashMint {
  // WETH 10
  address private WETH = 0xf4BB2e28688e89fCcE3c0580D37d36A7672E8A9F;
  bytes32 public immutable CALLBACK_SUCCESS =
    keccak256("ERC3156FlashBorrower.onFlashLoan");

  address public sender;
  address public token;

  event Log(string name, uint val);

  function flash() external {
    uint total = IERC20(WETH).totalSupply();
    // borrow more than available
    uint amount = total + 1;

    emit Log("total supply", total);

    IERC20(WETH).approve(WETH, amount);

    bytes memory data = "";
    WETH10(WETH).flashLoan(address(this), WETH, amount, data);
  }

  // called by WETH10
  function onFlashLoan(
    address _sender,
    address _token,
    uint amount,
    uint fee,
    bytes calldata data
  ) external returns (bytes32) {
    uint bal = IERC20(WETH).balanceOf(address(this));

    sender = _sender;
    token = _token;

    emit Log("amount", amount);
    emit Log("fee", fee);
    emit Log("balance", bal);

    return CALLBACK_SUCCESS;
  }
}

liquidation ?

https://github.com/t4sk/defi-by-example/blob/1afbd420bdd91b48c764a678fbcca48426ae8d31/contracts/TestCompoundErc20.sol#L152-L153

This issue was generated by todo based on a `TODO` comment in `1afbd42`. It's been assigned to @t4sk because they committed the code.

Error: Cannot create instance of IERC20; no code at address

why？

Everything is up to date, there is nothing to compile.

Contract: TestDyDxSoloMargin
1) "before each" hook for "flash loan"

0 passing (1s)
1 failing

Contract: TestDyDxSoloMargin
"before each" hook for "flash loan":
Error: Cannot create instance of IERC20; no code at address 0xA0b86991c6218b36c1d19D4a2e9Eb0cE3606eB48
at Object.checkCode (node_modules/truffle/build/webpack:/packages/contract/lib/utils/index.js:263:1)
at Function.at (node_modules/truffle/build/webpack:/packages/contract/lib/contract/constructorMethods.js:73:1)
at processTicksAndRejections (internal/process/task_queues.js:97:5)
at Context. (test/test-dydx-solo-margin.js:20:13)

where 17.60M USDC from ?

https://github.com/t4sk/harvest-hack/blob/1785ce6ded131a1b6369f55bab493af8cebd17f4/README.md#L32-L37

This issue was generated by todo based on a `TODO` comment in `1785ce6`. It's been assigned to @t4sk because they committed the code.

what is router?

https://github.com/t4sk/defi-by-example/blob/f55ac39a88db89ad9c34216e52486dc77a57d75f/contracts/TestUniswap.sol#L8-L13

This issue was generated by todo based on a `TODO` comment in `f55ac39`. It's been assigned to @t4sk because they committed the code.

Error when deploy TestAaveFlashLoan.sol

Hello!
When I try to deploy a contract, I get the error "Gas estimation failed".
I take the address for the constructor from the Aave list.
What am I doing wrong?

Liquidity.test.js

I am getting this error when I try to test: sender doesn't have enough funds to send tx. The max upfront cost is: 1527451433449412000 and the sender's account only has: 0.

I updated some of the code, is my hardhat setup wrong?
Error starts at when transfering DAI and USDC to owner.

const { expect } = require("chai")
const { ethers } = require("hardhat")

const DAI = "0x6B175474E89094C44Da98b954EedeAC495271d0F"
const USDC = "0xA0b86991c6218b36c1d19D4a2e9Eb0cE3606eB48"
const DAI_WHALE = "0x6FF8E4DB500cBd77d1D181B8908E022E29e0Ec4A"
const USDC_WHALE = "0xc3dcB715eDeb0374E968177A3620c441344c3ED8"
const IWETH = "0xC02aaA39b223FE8D0A0e5C4F27eAD9083C756Cc2"
const wethAmount = ethers.utils.parseEther("1")

describe("LiquidityExamples", () => {
  let liquidityExamples
  let accounts
  let dai
  let usdc
  let owner
  let iweth

  before(async () => {
    accounts = await ethers.getSigners()
    owner = accounts[0]
    console.log(`owner address : ${owner.address}`)
    console.log(`account[0] address : ${accounts[0].address}`)

    const LiquidityExamples = await ethers.getContractFactory(
      "LiquidityExamples"
    )
    liquidityExamples = await LiquidityExamples.deploy()
    await liquidityExamples.deployed()

    dai = await ethers.getContractAt("IERC20", DAI)
    usdc = await ethers.getContractAt("IERC20", USDC)
    iweth = await ethers.getContractAt("IWETH", IWETH)

    // Unlock DAI and USDC whales
    await network.provider.request({
      method: "hardhat_impersonateAccount",
      params: [DAI_WHALE],
    })
    await network.provider.request({
      method: "hardhat_impersonateAccount",
      params: [USDC_WHALE],
    })
    // get Signers
    const daiWhale = await ethers.getSigner(DAI_WHALE)
    const usdcWhale = await ethers.getSigner(USDC_WHALE)

    const daiBal = await dai.balanceOf(DAI_WHALE)
    const usdcBal = await usdc.balanceOf(USDC_WHALE)

    // Send DAI and USDC to accounts[0]
    const daiAmount = 10n * 10n ** 18n
    const usdcAmount = 10n * 10n ** 6n

    await dai.connect(daiWhale).transfer(owner.address, daiAmount)
    await usdc.connect(usdcWhale).transfer(owner.address, usdcAmount)

    const daiBalance = await dai.balanceOf(owner.address)
  })

  it("mintNewPosition", async () => {
    const daiAmount = 1n * 10n ** 18n
    const usdcAmount = 1n * 10n ** 6n

    await dai.connect(owner).transfer(liquidityExamples.address, daiAmount)
    await usdc.connect(owner).transfer(liquidityExamples.address, usdcAmount)

    await liquidityExamples.mintNewPosition()

    console.log(
      "DAI balance after add liquidity",
      await dai.balanceOf(accounts[0].address)
    )
    console.log(
      "USDC balance after add liquidity",
      await usdc.balanceOf(accounts[0].address)
    )
  })

  it.skip("increaseLiquidityCurrentRange", async () => {
    const daiAmount = 20n * 10n ** 18n
    const usdcAmount = 20n * 10n ** 6n

    await dai.connect(accounts[0]).approve(liquidityExamples.address, daiAmount)
    await usdc
      .connect(accounts[0])
      .approve(liquidityExamples.address, usdcAmount)

    await liquidityExamples.increaseLiquidityCurrentRange(daiAmount, usdcAmount)
  })

  it("decreaseLiquidity", async () => {
    const tokenId = await liquidityExamples.tokenId()
    const liquidity = await liquidityExamples.getLiquidity(tokenId)

    await liquidityExamples.decreaseLiquidity(liquidity)

    console.log("--- decrease liquidity ---")
    console.log(`liquidity ${liquidity}`)
    console.log(`dai ${await dai.balanceOf(liquidityExamples.address)}`)
    console.log(`usdc ${await usdc.balanceOf(liquidityExamples.address)}`)
  })

  it("collectAllFees", async () => {
    await liquidityExamples.collectAllFees()

    console.log("--- collect fees ---")
    console.log(`dai ${await dai.balanceOf(liquidityExamples.address)}`)
    console.log(`usdc ${await usdc.balanceOf(liquidityExamples.address)}`)
  })
})

Kindly Hide your api

Why am I getting incorrect WBTC when swapping it with DAI?

Hi I created a smart contract but when I swapped 1 Million DAI token I am getting only ~3379786784 WEI (~34 WBTC) but when I am checking its value on UNISWAP website it is showing 43 WBTC.

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/73275302/why-am-i-getting-incorrect-wbtc-when-swapping-it-with-dai-using-uniswap

why need weth?

https://github.com/t4sk/defi-by-example/blob/f55ac39a88db89ad9c34216e52486dc77a57d75f/contracts/TestUniswap.sol#L11-L16

This issue was generated by todo based on a `TODO` comment in `f55ac39`. It's been assigned to @t4sk because they committed the code.

I am using the infura and ganache but I still get this error when I attempt to setup ganache.

Test fail with BN library errors

Running the tests, the pow casts the input to a BN, which returns a hex value.

https://defiprime.com/hacks2020

Error minting ETH-USDC 0.3% pool Uniswap v3

I am using the following method to mint a Uniswap v3 position:

function mintPosition(
        address token0,
        address token1,
        uint24 poolFee,
        uint256 amount0,
        uint256 amount1,
        int24 rangeLeft,
        int24 rangeRight) external payable override returns (
            uint256 tokenId,
            uint128 liquidity,
            uint256 actualAmount0,
            uint256 actualAmount1
        )
    {

        // Approve the position manager
        TransferHelper.safeApprove(token0, address(nonfungiblePositionManager), amount0);
        TransferHelper.safeApprove(token1, address(nonfungiblePositionManager), amount1);

        INonfungiblePositionManager.MintParams memory params =
            INonfungiblePositionManager.MintParams({
                token0: token0,
                token1: token1,
                fee: poolFee,
                tickLower: rangeLeft,
                tickUpper: rangeRight,
                amount0Desired: amount0,
                amount1Desired: amount1,
                amount0Min: 0,
                amount1Min: 0,
                recipient: address(this),
                deadline: block.timestamp
            });

        // Note that the pool defined by token0/token1 and fee tier poolFee must already be created and initialized in order to mint
        // THIS TRANSACTION FAILS WITHOUT A REASON STRING
        (tokenId, liquidity, actualAmount0, actualAmount1) = nonfungiblePositionManager.mint(params);

        // Create a deposit
        _createDeposit(msg.sender, tokenId);

        // Remove allowance and refund in both assets.
        if (actualAmount0 < amount0) {
            TransferHelper.safeApprove(token0, address(nonfungiblePositionManager), 0);
            uint256 refund0 = amount0 - actualAmount0;
            TransferHelper.safeTransfer(token0, msg.sender, refund0);
        }

        if (actualAmount1 < amount1) {
            TransferHelper.safeApprove(token1, address(nonfungiblePositionManager), 0);
            uint256 refund1 = amount1 - actualAmount1;
            TransferHelper.safeTransfer(token1, msg.sender, refund1);
        }
    }

I am able to mint a DAI-USDC 0.01% with this method. But when trying to create an ETH-USDC 0.3% pool it fails without a reason string

My test code is this:

it("Should create a new ETH-USDC 0.3% position", async function () {
            
            const FEE = 3000;
            
            const { contract, owner } = await loadFixture(deployUniswapPoolFixture) 
            const ethAmount = 10n**18n;
            const usdcAmount = 3000n * 10n ** 6n;

            const tickLower = -887272 // Math.ceil(baseLog(BASE, Math.sqrt(1/1400)));
            const tickUpper = -tickLower // Math.ceil(baseLog(BASE, Math.sqrt(1/1200)));

            await weth.connect(owner).deposit({ value: 100n * 10n ** 18n });
            await weth.connect(owner).approve(contract.address, 100n * 10n ** 18n);

            await network.provider.request({
                method: "hardhat_impersonateAccount",
                params: [USDC_WHALE]
            })

            const usdcWhale = await ethers.getSigner(USDC_WHALE);
            expect(await usdc.balanceOf(USDC_WHALE)).to.be.greaterThan(usdcAmount);


            await usdc.connect(usdcWhale).transfer(owner.address, usdcAmount);
            await usdc.connect(owner).transfer(contract.address, usdcAmount);
            
            const newPosition = await contract.mintPosition(
                                                MAINNET_TOKENS.ETH,
                                                MAINNET_TOKENS.USDC,
                                                FEE,
                                                ethAmount,
                                                usdcAmount,
                                                tickLower,
                                                tickUpper);

            console.log(await dai.balanceOf(owner.address));

            // expect(daiBalanceAfter).to.be.equal(0);

        });

And I get the following error:

Error: Transaction reverted without a reason string
    at <UnrecognizedContract>.<unknown> (0xc36442b4a4522e871399cd717abdd847ab11fe88)
    at UniswapPool.mintPosition (contracts/uniswap/UniswapPool.sol:95)
    at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:96:5)
    at HardhatNode._mineBlockWithPendingTxs (node_modules/hardhat/src/internal/hardhat-network/provider/node.ts:1802:23)
    at HardhatNode.mineBlock (node_modules/hardhat/src/internal/hardhat-network/provider/node.ts:491:16)
    at EthModule._sendTransactionAndReturnHash (node_modules/hardhat/src/internal/hardhat-network/provider/modules/eth.ts:1522:18)
    at HardhatNetworkProvider.request (node_modules/hardhat/src/internal/hardhat-network/provider/provider.ts:118:18)
    at EthersProviderWrapper.send (node_modules/@nomiclabs/hardhat-ethers/src/internal/ethers-provider-wrapper.ts:13:20)

Note that I'm using MIN_TICK and MAX_TICK for the range

Can you please help me to understand what is wrong with my code?

Thank you very much in advance

Error: Returned error: sender account not recognized

Hi! When running script:
test-erc20.js
I get an error:
Error: Returned error: sender account not recognized on line:
await token.transfer(accounts[0], bal, { from: WHALE });
Can you please tell me what could be the reason?

Error: The send transactions "from" field must be defined!

Hi,

I have downloaded the repo and set the infura key but I am getting this error where executing npx truffle test --network mainnet_fork test/test-uniswap.js:

Contract: TestUniswap
  1) "before each" hook for "should pass"


0 passing (608ms)
1 failing

1) Contract: TestUniswap
     "before each" hook for "should pass":
   Error: Returned error: base fee exceeds gas limit
    at Context.<anonymous> (test/test-uniswap.js:22:40)
    at processTicksAndRejections (internal/process/task_queues.js:95:5)

How do I solve it?

Thank you

Encode your logic here

https://github.com/t4sk/defi-by-example/blob/895754b7d7213f4e398b8a4de23072c78f90c821/contracts/TestDydxSoloMargin.sol#L47-L52

This issue was generated by todo based on a `TODO` comment in `895754b`. It's been assigned to @t4sk because they committed the code.

Help running test-uniswap-liquidity.js

Concerning a tutorial video that I came across around adding/removing liquidity into Uniswap https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=816kTTNzcHs, I have the following the issue.

When I attempt to run test-uniswap-liquidity.js under truffle environment, it keeps failing on this line of code:

await tokenA.transfer(CALLER, TOKEN_A_AMOUNT, { from: TOKEN_A_WHALE });

_truffle(mainnet_fork)> truffle test test/test-uniswap-liquidity.js --network mainnet_fork
Using network 'mainnet_fork'.

Compiling your contracts...
Compiling https://github.com/OpenZeppelin\contracts\token\ERC20\IERC20.sol
Compiling https://github.com/OpenZeppelin\contracts\utils\math\SafeMath.sol
Compiling .\contracts\Flashloan-arbitrage.sol
Compiling .\contracts\Migrations.sol
Compiling .\contracts\TestUniswapLiquidity.sol
Compiling .\contracts\UniswapV2Library.sol
Compiling .\contracts\interfaces\IERC20.sol
Compiling .\contracts\interfaces\IUniswapV2Callee.sol
Compiling .\contracts\interfaces\IUniswapV2Factory.sol
Compiling .\contracts\interfaces\IUniswapV2Pair.sol
Compiling .\contracts\interfaces\IUniswapV2Router01.sol
Compiling .\contracts\interfaces\IUniswapV2Router02.sol
Compiling .\contracts\interfaces\Uniswap.sol
Artifacts written to C:\Users\SAMUEL~1.SAD\AppData\Local\Temp\test--17744-7ubcxUBqpENh
Compiled successfully using:

solc: 0.8.16+commit.07a7930e.Emscripten.clang
step1...
step2...
step4...TOKEN_A_AMOUNT = BN {
negative: 0,
words: [ 779264, 149, <1 empty item> ],
length: 2,
red: null
}
step4...TOKEN_B_AMOUNT = BN {
negative: 0,
words: [ 779264, 149, <1 empty item> ],
length: 2,
red: null
}
Contract: TestUniswapLiquidity
CALLER... 0x031213df405840b7BCdEb5A7A9126BbD77A6aed3
step6...contract: 0xa0A14ceC4C0cFa67a3d5f39A4704465fC2e446B1
step7 - sent Ether...
step8a - CALLER: 0x031213df405840b7BCdEb5A7A9126BbD77A6aed3
step8b - TOKEN_A_AMOUNT (parsed): 10000000000
step8c - TOKEN_B_AMOUNT (parsed): 10000000000
calling again CALLER... 0x031213df405840b7BCdEb5A7A9126BbD77A6aed3
TOKEN_A_WHALE: 0xee2826453A4Fd5AfeB7ceffeEF3fFA2320081268

"before each" hook for "add liquidity and remove liquidity"

0 passing (2s)
1 failing

Contract: TestUniswapLiquidity
"before each" hook for "add liquidity and remove liquidity":
Error: Returned error: sender account not recognized -- Reason given: Custom error (could not decode).
at Context. (test\test-uniswap-liquidity.js:48:18)
at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:96:5)
truffle(mainnet_fork)> truffle --version
Truffle v5.5.28 (core: 5.5.28)
Ganache v7.4.0
Solidity - 0.8.16 (solc-js)
Node v16.17.0
Web3.js v1.7.4_

I would greatly appreciate any insights as to how I could resolve this problem which has been going on for several days now.

One other thing, the liquidity concept is only applicable for non-flash swap contracts/transactions, is that correct?
Reason being, I attempted to run a flash swap loan arbitrage app in truffle that I´ve developed but keeps giving me with the Insufficient liquidity error message which was the original reason why I came across your video.

Thanks once again for your help.

BR,
Samuel

stakewithus / defi-by-example Goto Github PK

defi-by-example's Introduction

Install

For windows

To run

Test

defi-by-example's People

Contributors

Stargazers

Watchers

Forkers

defi-by-example's Issues

This issue was generated by todo based on a TODO comment in 1afbd42. It's been assigned to @t4sk because they committed the code.

This issue was generated by todo based on a TODO comment in 1afbd42. It's been assigned to @t4sk because they committed the code.

This issue was generated by todo based on a TODO comment in 1785ce6. It's been assigned to @t4sk because they committed the code.

This issue was generated by todo based on a TODO comment in f55ac39. It's been assigned to @t4sk because they committed the code.

This issue was generated by todo based on a TODO comment in f55ac39. It's been assigned to @t4sk because they committed the code.

This issue was generated by todo based on a TODO comment in 895754b. It's been assigned to @t4sk because they committed the code.

Recommend Projects

Recommend Topics

Recommend Org

This issue was generated by todo based on a `TODO` comment in `1afbd42`. It's been assigned to @t4sk because they committed the code.

This issue was generated by todo based on a `TODO` comment in `1afbd42`. It's been assigned to @t4sk because they committed the code.

This issue was generated by todo based on a `TODO` comment in `1785ce6`. It's been assigned to @t4sk because they committed the code.

This issue was generated by todo based on a `TODO` comment in `f55ac39`. It's been assigned to @t4sk because they committed the code.

This issue was generated by todo based on a `TODO` comment in `f55ac39`. It's been assigned to @t4sk because they committed the code.

This issue was generated by todo based on a `TODO` comment in `895754b`. It's been assigned to @t4sk because they committed the code.