Small compilation problem on BSD. about efsw HOT 6 CLOSED

Original comment by Martín Lucas Golini (Bitbucket: SpartanJ, GitHub: SpartanJ).

Thanks for reporting it. I've made the change but i don't have any VM with BSD to test it, so i trust that it's working!

from efsw.

Original comment by Karol Woźniak (Bitbucket: KenjiTakahashi, GitHub: KenjiTakahashi).

Wrong file :). It's in hpp, not cpp.

from efsw.

Original comment by Martín Lucas Golini (Bitbucket: SpartanJ, GitHub: SpartanJ).

Wrong fix.
Fixed Issue #3.

from efsw.

Original comment by Martín Lucas Golini (Bitbucket: SpartanJ, GitHub: SpartanJ).

Oh, my bad, that was funnny, it looked weird when i made the change... haha Now it's ok?
Now that you're using BSD, can you recommend me a nice and simple distro to install in a VM. In other words, what BSD distro are you using to test this? Thanks!!

from efsw.

Original comment by Karol Woźniak (Bitbucket: KenjiTakahashi, GitHub: KenjiTakahashi).

Yes, it's OK now :).

I do not use BSD on daily basic, just to test some software I want to work there.

For "nice and simple BSD", I don't think such thing exists.

PC-BSD aims at sth, but it actually creates more problems than it solves.

OpenBSD would be nice (they have a nice ports management, for example), but it was very unstable in VirtualBox and I had to give up after ~5 reinstalls... (I know their installer by heart now)

So I ended up using FreeBSD, which worked, but unfortunately took huge amount of disk space (>7GB for just X+awesome+firefox). But if you'd like to go for FreeBSD, use 9.x releases. Legacy ones (8.x) used an strange installer, which barely works.

Now I'm gonna give Dragonfly a spin and see if it's any good.

from efsw.

Original comment by Martín Lucas Golini (Bitbucket: SpartanJ, GitHub: SpartanJ).

Thanks for the info Karol :), i was using PC-BSD, but the VM was really slow. I think i'm going to try Arch BSD, i just want X+openbox and gcc 4.8.

from efsw.