rye-catcher / ped Goto Github PK

When adding an applicant with a long address: addapplicant n/Toolong address t/sample1 p/92812192 nric/S1234567A a/Tampines St 96 Block 312 WE COME ON THE SLOOP JOHN B MY GRANDFA AND ME AROUND THE NASSU TOWN WE DID ROAM e/[email protected] d/2022-03-12.

The view of person's profile card becomes like this: The view of address section is buggy.

Screenshot 2022-04-01 at 3.21.39 PM.png

Similarly, if entering a job with long address like this: addjob jt/LONG ADDRESS 1 c/Ebiz Pte Ltd a/59 Hougang Road Blk 38 WOULDN'T IT BE NICE IF WE OLDER THEN WE WOULDN'T HAVE TO WAIT SO LONG q/Bachelors in Computer Science pos/ft sal/3000-4000

The address section of that job card is also bugged.

Screenshot 2022-04-01 at 3.28.42 PM.png

Flag to mark the attribute used to sort the applicant list. [ATTRIBUTE] must be either dateapplied, interview, job

"dateapplied", "interview" and "job" should be formatted differently to distinguish them from normal text

Screenshot 2022-04-01 at 2.30.53 PM.png

When I entered the command: editjob 5 sal/1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000-10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000.

It is in the format of "[Non-negative integers][-][Non-negative integers]. The right bound salary should be equal to or more than the left bound salary".

But the output message still tells me It is in the wrong format. Because the string exceeds the integer limit.

Screenshot 2022-04-01 at 3.06.58 PM.png

It just tells me it is wrong, but does not provide other information like the correct usage and examples. But other some commands like addapplicant will output such information

Screenshot 2022-04-01 at 2.33.54 PM.png

When trying to enter the command find which does not appear on the UG.

It still tells the user the "correct" command usage. Instead of telling them this is a invalid command.

Screenshot 2022-04-01 at 2.38.16 PM.png

Also find alice will tell you 0 person listed though there are people name with "Alice" in the person list (this command should be invalid anyway)

It says status must either be pending, accepted, or rejected. but actually it didn't report any error when you input something else like interviewed as status.

Screenshot 2022-04-01 at 2.27.11 PM.png

There is a number after the job title on the display like this: Software engineer #3

The number should be the "job id". However it is not well stated in the UG. It may cause confusion for the users.

Screenshot 2022-04-01 at 3.38.03 PM.png

I was trying to enter a command like edit 5 i/12345678 which does not appear on the UG. But it still shows information about the command format of edit command.

Screenshot 2022-04-01 at 2.21.15 PM.png

And when I enter edit 1 p/12345678. It will tell me The person index provided is invalid.

When I was trying to enter command like delete which does not appear on the UG.

It still show the user the "correct" command usage and examples instead of telling users it is an invalid command.

Screenshot 2022-04-01 at 2.53.22 PM.png

When adding a tag with too long name like this:
addapplicant n/John Rick t/sample1 p/92812192 nric/S1234567A a/Tampines St 96 Block 312 e/[email protected] d/2022-03-12 t/123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890

The view of the tag can exceed the person card view.

Screenshot 2022-04-01 at 3.14.34 PM.png

When I was trying to enter the command add which does not appear on the UG.

It still tells me the "correct" command usage and examples instead of telling me it is an invalid command

Screenshot 2022-04-01 at 2.45.58 PM.png

When I was trying to enter the command list which does not appear on the UG.

The application processed it as a correct command and output the "correct" message to tell me it runs successfully.

However, it should tell the user it is invalid.

Screenshot 2022-04-01 at 2.42.36 PM.png

And in fact it did not list all the persons.