deprecation warning question about rsolr HOT 4 CLOSED

PS: This is Rsolr 1.0.2

We are currently unable to run Blacklight with more recent RSolr's, for reasons that I personally do not understand, but I think either Erik or Cbeer have filed other issues on that. That's a diff issue though.

from rsolr.

Hi Jonathan,

To make a long story short, pagination was added to rsolr, then it was almost removed, and now it's there to stay. The deprecation warning is an annoying side effect of that flip-flop.

The reason Blacklight is not able to use more recent versions of rsolr, is because rsolr-ext is not yet compatible with rsolr. rsolr-ext needs to have its pagination removed to work properly with the new rsolr.

Matt

from rsolr.

Okay, thanks. Blacklight master is now working with current rsolr, by
virtue of never passing it a :page or :per_page key, Blacklight now
calculates the Solr start/rows params itself.

Do you think it makes sense to release a patch release of Rsolr
without the deprecation warning, if it's spurious?

On Dec 8, 2011, at 10:59 PM, Matt Mitchell wrote:

Hi Jonathan,

To make a long story short, pagination was added to rsolr, then it
was almost removed, and now it's there to stay. The deprecation
warning is an annoying side effect of that flip-flop.

The reason Blacklight is not able to use more recent versions of
rsolr, is because rsolr-ext is not yet compatible with rsolr. rsolr-
ext needs to have its pagination removed to work properly with the
new rsolr.

Matt

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#33 (comment)

from rsolr.

I believe this is no longer an issue.

from rsolr.