so I was feeling a bit funny when making the bot. and it was funny at first, but you can only see "sucks to suck" so many times before it gets stale. And some users might genuinely have negative feelings when reading that, so we should put something else there. or just remove it. idk

point is:

• check lines for rudeness
• remove rudeness

modify '/votekick' so that votes can be casted to user mentioned after command, if :
1. command is not replied to a message
or
2. replied message is forwarded from a user that haa privacy restriction on accessing user through forwarded message

syntax: /kickvote @username

check if message that was replied to in /votekick was already deleted

quoted from : @RiedleroD

channels are currently visible as bots to the bot - we should be able to warn those as well though, so either find out how to differenciate channels from actual bots, or just make it accept warns against bots

when /rules is sent, the bot should reply with the rules. A few scenarios:

• If person A sends /rules as a reply to message B, the bot should reply with the rules to message B
• If person A sends /rules, the bot should reply to the message from person A

Also, /rules doesn't have any parameters and if any are provided (e.g. a mention), they should be ignored.

idfk

unvote discards one's vote (probably with a mention or reply, as multiple votes may be held simultaneously)

votestay compenstaes votekick of another trusted one -- idk whats the use case for this, just the random idea