ridedott / eslint-config Goto Github PK

Dependabot couldn't authenticate with npm.pkg.github.com/ridedott.

Dependabot tried to authenticate with the details you previously provided, but authentication failed. If they are no longer valid you will need to provide Dependabot with new credentials.

You can provide authentication details in your Dependabot dashboard by clicking into the account menu (in the top right) and selecting 'Config variables'.

View the update logs.

Dependabot couldn't authenticate with npm.pkg.github.com/ridedott.

Dependabot tried to authenticate with the details you previously provided, but authentication failed. If they are no longer valid you will need to provide Dependabot with new credentials.

You can provide authentication details in your Dependabot dashboard by clicking into the account menu (in the top right) and selecting 'Config variables'.

View the update logs.

Hi! , thanks for this super interesting ESLint configuration ;)

Trying to use in my projects gives me the error "Configuration for rule @typescript-eslint/array-type is invalid: Value array-simple should be object."

Taking a look to the code, rules/typescript.js:3 seems to be the problem, the documentation says that it expects an object but it's receiving a string.

Dependabot couldn't authenticate with npm.pkg.github.com/ridedott.

Dependabot tried to authenticate with the details you previously provided, but authentication failed. If they are no longer valid you will need to provide Dependabot with new credentials.

You can provide authentication details in your Dependabot dashboard by clicking into the account menu (in the top right) and selecting 'Config variables'.

View the update logs.

Linting the example code below I am presented with the following error:

Unnecessary conditional, value is always falsy. @typescript-eslint/no-unnecessary-condition

const list1: string[] | undefined;

const list2 = ['bar', 'baz'].some(
  (value: string): boolean => list1?.includes(value) ?? false,
);

As list1 is potentially undefined the nullish coalescing (??) makes sense. A potential workaround is to instead write:

const list2 = ['bar', 'baz'].some(
  (value: string): boolean => list1?.includes(value) === true,
);

Though I feel like this should not be reported by the linter as an error.