where/error failures give no information about source of error about redex HOT 6 CLOSED

from redex.

I got an offline messages from someone else suggesting I should elaborate a little bit. It may be that you're running outside of DrRacket / with errortrace turned off for performance reasons. And redex code seems to benefit more than other code for doing that so that makes sense as a default. Redex, however, has a bunch of code to cooperate with errortrace so that the source locations are helpful when errortrace is turned on. So my recommendation would be to temporarily turn it back on to get a source location for the error when things like this happen. If running in DrRacket isn't convenient for some reason, then a command line invocation like this one:

racket -l errortrace -l racket/base -e '(require (submod "x.rkt" test))'

where "x.rkt" is replaced with your filename should also do the trick.

(If there is a situation where using errortrace like that still gives a bad source location, that's a bug (and fixable), so please send me something to reproduce it so I can find it (it is okay if it is a lot of code; that won't matter for this kind of bug, I believe.)

from redex.

@rfindler I'm currently using raco outside of dr-racket because it's running on a server without X11 enabled. I can certainly try enabling errortrace; is the -l option something I can also pass to raco?

from redex.

You'd need to use a command-line like the racket one I posted, I believe. raco test runs test submodules, and so that's why there is the require there. There may be a more convenient way to do this, but I'm not sure what it is. I don't see an argument to raco test that turns errortrace on (but adding one does seem like a good idea).

If you're running in CI or something like that, you might want to leave errortrace out of it and use errortrace only for debugging locally on your machine, tho.

from redex.

OK, next time I get an error like this, I will give it a try, thanks.

I am wondering: how hard would it be for the where/error failure message to include more information? That would already be enough a lot of the time.

from redex.

OK, I tried it, and it worked! Thanks.

from redex.