This idea extends the scope of the site quite a bit but bear with me.
As a follow-up to #30, I suggest to also represent KYC providers on the site.
The spirit of kycnot, as I see it, is to make people much more informed about opportunities of KYC-less services (the good list) as well as warn them about KYC-ed services (the "bad" list suggested in #30), especially ones that try to sell themselves as "no account" but then strike you with "oops sorry surprise KYC.. aaand we'll hold your funds hostage for now".
I think people are slowly getting the dangers of sharing their personal data with exchanges. But few people realize that many exchanges actually delegate KYC services to a small set of mostly unknown KYC providers. These entities act as centralized hubs for collecting enormous amounts of sensitive user data.
While it is still unclear how many payment applications have embedded Plaid (hence the lawsuit), a few of the known integrations include Venmo, Coinbase, Gemini, Square Cash, Stripe, and Gusto. (enegnei.github.io)
Jumio is being used for online identity verification by five of the top 10 cryptocurrency exchanges, including Coinbase, Bittrex, and Bitstamp. Jumioβs Netverify is also increasingly being deployed by ICO issuers to magnify the trust and transparency associated with their blockchain-related projects and to meet evolving AML and KYC compliance requirements. (jumio.com)
One way to add them to the site is to have a page for each one of them, and establish a bidirectional linking between KYC providers and exchanges/processors that use them.