sharutils build failure on 10.9 about nixpkgs HOT 8 OPEN

This sounds like a 10.10 binary got installed into /nix on a 10.9 machine. I bet if you wipe those entries from /nix, then do a --repair install with use of binary caches disabled, it will work. I have yet seen any difficulties with compiling anything on 10.9 or nix-on-Ubuntu.

from nixpkgs.

That must have been what it was. I did as you suggested

$ sudo rm -fr /nix/store/zj3sns4csb3xcj8xn4v2cg21s9jy410g-coreutils-8.23
$ nix-env -i nix --repair --option build-use-substitutes false

and it worked! Thanks!

from nixpkgs.

Yes, the binary cache is populated from a 10.10 machine. I don't know where the "Nix on OS X" guide is, but that should be documented there (though I believe it shouldn't matter for pure-darwin what the host is, right @copumpkin?)

from nixpkgs.

Yeah, pure-darwin keeps symbols like _fchmodat out of 10.10 builds as well, so things should work on both 10.10 and 10.9.

from nixpkgs.

@purefn Is this still happening?

from nixpkgs.

@joelteon I haven't tried building on a 10.9 machine while using the zalora cache lately. I'll try it out when I get a moment.

from nixpkgs.

This is not going to be fixed until pure darwin, zalora's cache will remain 10.10

from nixpkgs.

Oh ok. I was hoping Joel meant there had been a change such that it
shouldn't be an issue anymore. :(

On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Shea Levy [email protected] wrote:

This is not going to be fixed until pure darwin, zalora's cache will
remain 10.10

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#18 (comment).

from nixpkgs.