[PRE REVIEW]: A course on Geographic Data Science about jose-reviews HOT 31 CLOSED

👋 @lheagy — Would you like to review this submission to JOSE? Looks right up your alley! (If you're unable, could you recommend someone else? Thanks!)

from jose-reviews.

Hello, @jsta — Perhaps you may want to contribute a review for JOSE on this submission?

from jose-reviews.

I'm happy to contribute a review on this paper @labarba

from jose-reviews.

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. @labarba it looks like you're currently assigned as the editor for this paper 🎉

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

What happens now?

This submission is currently in a pre-review state which means we are waiting for the assigned editor (@labarba) to find some reviewers for your submission. This may take anything between a few hours to a couple of weeks. Thanks for your patience 😸

You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here.

from jose-reviews.

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

from jose-reviews.

PDF failed to compile for issue #40 with the following error:

Can't find any papers to compile :-(

from jose-reviews.

@whedon generate pdf

from jose-reviews.

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

from jose-reviews.

Hi @labarba: This looks really interesting! I would be happy to review :)

from jose-reviews.

@whedon assign @lheagy as reviewer

from jose-reviews.

OK, the reviewer is @lheagy

from jose-reviews.

@whedon generate pdf

from jose-reviews.

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

from jose-reviews.

👉 Check article proof 📄 👈

from jose-reviews.

@whedon check references

from jose-reviews.

Attempting to check references...

from jose-reviews.

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1080/02680510701619976 may be missing for title: Designing Learning Objects for Online Learning
- https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315763309-4 may be missing for title: Principles of enquiry-based learning
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1183338 may be missing for title: Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.2017.1384734 may be missing for title: 50 years of data science
- https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01976-0_3 may be missing for title: Interactive techniques and exploratory spatial data analysis
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017607301605 may be missing for title: Supervised regionalization methods: A survey

INVALID DOIs

- None

from jose-reviews.

👋 @darribas — Doing the pre-checks on your paper, we've found that your references list is missing a bunch of DOIs. Check on the helpful suggestions of our bot ☝️
Please update your BibTeX entries to include the DOIs.

from jose-reviews.

Hello,

Thanks very much @labarba for the suggestion. I've added those I've been able on 1cac024 but there are a few I cannot find them and I'm not sure they actually have any. In those cases, I've provided the url field to the official source. In the case of books, I've used the doi entry in bibtex, but entered ISBN:XXX with the book's ISBN. Happy to iterate if this is not the common practice, but I'm not sure all the entries have a DOI. Thanks!

from jose-reviews.

@whedon check references

from jose-reviews.

Attempting to check references...

from jose-reviews.

OK DOIs

- http://doi.org/10.2307/1183338 is OK
- http://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.2017.1384734 is OK
- http://doi.org/ISBN:978-0-471-73545-8 is OK
- http://doi.org/10.1177/0160017607301605  is OK

MISSING DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1080/02680510701619976 may be missing for title: Designing Learning Objects for Online Learning
- https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526401717.n4 may be missing for title: Principles of enquiry-based learning

INVALID DOIs

- None

from jose-reviews.

@whedon generate pdf

from jose-reviews.

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

from jose-reviews.

👉 Check article proof 📄 👈

from jose-reviews.

@darribas : You shouldn't use the doi field for ISBNs (that turns into a broken link). The two "missing DOIs" suggested by whedon are false leads.

from jose-reviews.

Also, you need { } around GIS in https://github.com/darribas/gds18/blob/1cac024f860caa9bbd31b47df937b9377daf724a/paper.bib#L83

from jose-reviews.

@whedon add @jsta as reviewer

from jose-reviews.

OK, @jsta is now a reviewer

from jose-reviews.

@whedon start review

from jose-reviews.

OK, I've started the review over in #42. Feel free to close this issue now!

from jose-reviews.