👋 This repository is only for review issues (pre-review and review) that have been created by our editorial infrastructure, and this issue appears not to be one of these.

As such, this issue will be closed. If you're opening an issue as part of a review, please open a new issue instead in the software repository associated with the submission that you are reviewing.

Many thanks!

from jose-reviews.

Thank you @incsanchezro for your comprehensive review. Please see below replies and updates.

Kind regards,
-R

Reply to #244

Comments:

1. The authors have articulated the need for this educational framework, targeting the environmental modellers and decision-makers as specific audiences that could benefit from its implementation. The framework's usage and installation instructions are detailed.

Appreciated.

2. A comprehensive workflow is recommended for the written and framework documentation. This addition should clearly outline the self-learning process, including learning objectives, module prerequisites, and potential implementations. It should make it easier for users to navigate the software autonomously or for educators to integrate it into their teaching methodologies, provided they possess the necessary expertise.

We appreciate the suggestion and agree in principle. We had purposefully left it open ended, as as we tend to find that most users have unique issues that result in each taking their own path.

Nevertheless, we have added learning objectives and prerequisites in the "Contents and Instructional Design" section of the manuscript and to the README. Furthermore we have included an "example workflow" schematic outline.

We feel that the existing "workflow" outlined in the README provides sufficient guidance to the self-learning process. Furthermore, each of the Notebooks has an introductory section where the learning objectives are usually outlined, along with how these are related to real-world applications.

3. The repository's current documentation needs specific guidelines for community involvement in the module's collaborative development. This oversight could be rectified by establishing clear pathways for third-party contributions, issue reporting, and support-seeking, fostering a more engaged and supportive community around the framework.

We have included a "Contributing" section in the README. See commit
gmdsi/GMDSI_notebooks@bf5229a

4. Additionally, clarifying the project's funding sources and outlining strategies for its long-term sustainability would provide further transparency and confidence in the framework's continued evolution and support.

Funding and support for the project is described in the Acknowledgements section of the README. See https://github.com/gmdsi/GMDSI_notebooks#acknowledgments

from jose-reviews.