New maintainers about steamworks-rs HOT 6 CLOSED

@Noxime is it possible for you to give publish permissions for the crate to someone else while you're indisposed? I think we're seeing enough change that we should prep a 0.9 release.

from steamworks-rs.

I'm certainly available to help maintain the crate insofar as keeping it in sync with the published Steamworks SDK.

I maintain the wrapper around this library for integrating it into Bevy, and definitely want to see this kept up to date.

Hearing of your conscription is a bit concerning to hear in these trying times though.

from steamworks-rs.

Hey, recently I started my own fork of steamworks-rs because of the lack of maintaining. I'm very active on github and I would be happy to be a co-maintainer, if needed.

from steamworks-rs.

Thank you @james7132 and @ceifa, I have added you both as new collaborators to the repository. I will return to maintainership when I move into the reserves in the fall, but till then I will be quite inactive.

(and do not worry about the conscription, it is a long tradition here and we do not intend to provoke any conflict with anyone, anytime :) )

from steamworks-rs.

I am quite busy on a project myself, but I will likely contribute every few months. Also as I've made the NetworkingSockets wrapper I'd be happy to join any discussions regarding that.

from steamworks-rs.

@Noxime sorry to bother you again about this, but with the v0.9.0, I think we'll also need ownership of the steamworks-sys crate too.

from steamworks-rs.