nocomplexity / architectureplaybook Goto Github PK

line 131 in quality.md has grammatical errors.

Coming from commit (8f4c2a3 circa 2018-07-10), it says
The material of ISO is unfortunate not open. But since quality matters and ISO 25010 is used heavily for managing quality aspects within business IT systems a short overview.

imho,

• 'unfortunate' should be an adverb ('unfortunately'), in order to modify 'not open'.
• The next sentence can be rephrased for better clarity and more proper grammar.

The businessprinciples.rst has dups on 'maximize benefit to the enterprise'?

Namely, the following two section sharing the same 'statement', and similar 'rationale' and 'implications'.

• Maximise Benefit to the Enterprise (line136-163)
• Maximize Benefit to the complete enterprise (line164-188)

Both sections seem to come from the same commit (a7297f9 circa 2019-11-16), sans cosmetic touchups from two commits (30becd5 and 415549d)

I will be more than happy to put together a patch alone or via collaboration. any insight or context on the original intent(s) would be appreciated.

In "Short overview of ISO 25010" -> Security:
There is a duplicate entry for "Confidentiality" and "Compliance" is missing.

See: https://nocomplexity.com/documents/arplaybook/quality.html#security

Hi,

Thank you for your playbook, it really looks interesting. When I was quickly running through it, I found 2 outdated links :

• Basic business architecture template
• Stakeholder template

Best regards,

Maxime