How about this two? Both were published in 2018.

Clarke, R. I. “How We Done It Good: Research Through Design as a Legitimate Methodology for Librarianship.” Library and Information Science Research 40 (4).

Clarke, R. I. “Toward a Design Epistemology for Librarianship.” The Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy 88 (1): 41-59.

Link to Rachel's publications

Create the following links from Site to Canvas

• Syllabus links to site (edit the link in Canvas to point to Syllabus page on Site)
• Assignment links to site (Edit the assignments link to point to Assignment page on Site)
• All topic links on home page of site line up with all links for Modules in Canvas (For example - the link to week 1 Module in Canvas should point at the first link on the site - see screenshot link below)

https://github.com/nniiicc/LIS-570-Au2020/blob/master/Class-sched.jpg

In Canvas

• Erase all photos from front page (masthead, instructor, ta, etc.)
• In masthead - enter info about instructor and TA (you!) - my office hours are by appointment only

What else should we add to this?

If you have ideas just add to this issue as a comment

This is the Google doc for assignment 3 (protocol draft).

Please create the following discussion forums in Canvas. Make sure these are Public and enable Threaded Replies and Likes.

Introductions

Text: Please introduce yourself to the class. Tell us: 1. Where you are in the world, 2. What you are interested in pursuing in LIS, and 3. Your score on this quiz https://isthisasandwich.netlify.app/

Research Topic Discussions & Group Finding

Text: Throughout the quarter we will complete three assignments that are about a single research topic. Please read the assignment overview page on our course site first... Then if you are interested in working with a group, post here about a topic you are interested in working on. Note - you do not HAVE to work in a group, but we recommend it. Here is an example of what you might post (e.g. think of a research topic post going form general to more specific.)

1. I am interested in academic libraries
2. In particular I am interested in digital literacy education in public university libraries
3. An emergent problem for digital literacy in public universities is the ability for freshmen students to assess reliable research findings in online resources. The research project I would like to work on is about literacy levels of freshmen at public universities, and what libraries have found impactful to improving digital literacy.

Class Questions and Comments
Text: Ask any questions about class or assignments here.

LIS Research News
Text: Share any interesting articles or ideas about research here.

Please add as a response below which project numbers (e.g. Group 21-26) I should be grading.

Create agenda and share with Claire and Wan-chen

Wan-Chen finished grading the research problem statement finals and will start grading the literature review finals tomorrow.

three-sheet spreadsheet (which includes examples) can be found here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1JGr9gT1YuncfDnNlqNas7Rh6l6itcdx38gI6crLmzQs/edit?usp=sharing

the spreadsheet is meant to be used for two purposes:

1. recording projects and their authors
2. matching projects w peer reviewers

when students decide on a group for their project, they can enter their group members' names and their project's working title into the first sheet; individual projects should also be added into the spreadsheet. project-making entities will then sign up to review projects within the same document, so that the groups/reviewers are all documented in the same location.

• Section A
• Section B

for research ethics:

Indian Health Service. Indian Health Service Institutional Review Boards (IRB) Available at: https://www.ihs.gov/dper/research/hsrp/instreviewboards/

Morton, Deborah J., Proudfit, Joely, Calac, Daniel, Portillo, Martina, Lofton-Fitzsimmons, Geneva, Molina, Theda, Majel-McCauley, Romelle. (2013). Creating research capacity through a tribally based institutional review board. The American Journal of Public Health, 103(12), 2160

@wanchen23 + @cmcd276 - can you please check if you have access to LIS 570 class discussion recordings? If you do can you upload them to the drive folder below and let me know when you have done so:

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1xbSf-gFL6QoxnTtIq3inpD0ymNIq2dR5?usp=sharing

On presenting research results, chapter 9 of this book is on "Writing, Authoring, and Publishing."
Lindlof, T., & Taylor, Bryan C. (2011). Qualitative communication research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE.
--> I have the print book but don't have a scanner at home...

There is a newer (4th) edition of this book:
Lindlof, T., & Taylor, Bryan C. (2019). Qualitative communication research methods (Fourth ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.

In google forms create a survey:

1-5 scale questions:

• I find lectures helpful
• Lecture length
• I find chapters helpful

One thing I would like to see change

Overall this course

Here is the Google Doc link to the draft: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mAGj7ICPr86LPU8xK4RbwPMRMOM74tKlPoPwMe1O9b0/edit?usp=sharing

With remaining time from our meeting this week - it would be super helpful if you have readings that you like in this area, readings that you find that look helpful, or readings for an LIS spotlight. These are the remaining topics I need lit for:

Research design (that is how to design research rather than design based research)

• Topics include sampling, etc.

Quant data collection
Quant analysis

Qual data collection
Qual analysis

Design methods

Reporting

Create the following assignments with the following due dates and points. For right now - you don't need to input any text about the assignments.

Research / Evaluation Problem Statement - Draft

• • Due Oct 15
• • Points 10

Research / Evaluation Problem Statement - Final

• • Final Due Dec 4
• • Points 20

Literature Review Draft

• • Due Oct 30
• • Points 10

Literature Review - Peer Review

• • Due November 6
• • Points 5

Literature Review - Final

• • Due December 4
• • Points 20

Data Collection and Analysis Protocol - Draft

• • Nov 13
• • 10

Data Collection and Analysis Protocol - Final

• • December 4
• • 20

• Review key points in lecture... take questions
• Ask questions about paradigm / ontology / epistemology / methods (from Claire)
• • Was there anything in either reading that was surprising or unfamiliar to you?
• • Brown and Dueñas present four paradigms (positivism, post-positivism, constructivism/interpretivism, critical theory) and the RWJF presents five (interpretivist, positivist, critical/subtle realist, feminist). Which paradigm(s)--if any--felt like they aligned with your worldview?
• • Brown and Dueñas also introduce pragmatism, which they present as both paradigm and methodology. What are your thoughts on their definition?
• • These two texts present conceptual foundations of social science research. How might these conceptual foundations be relevant in practice for information professionals (e.g. librarians, archivists, etc.)?

Looking ahead

• Research ethics
• Assignment 1 - point out rubrics

• Murder episode from You're wrong about this @cmcd276