mvermaat / crm.specflow Goto Github PK

Currently only the legacy interface is supported

Remove the opportunity close button or open a closed opportunity and execute the close opportunity command. The dialog opening method still succceeds, even though there is no button. The operation then fails with a nullreference when it tries to fill the dialog.

Decimal fields are currently parsed based on the settings of the computer. This means that a test may not work when running from another computer or a build server. Use uniform parsing where the format can be configured.

Secondary check if the format must be passed for UI tests when writing decimal numbers, maybe based on user settings.

When a form has a quick view, the fields on the quick view form are treated like they are fields on the main form. This causes problems if the logicalname of a field in the quick view form is the same as a field on the main entity.

When running Specflow locally and activating a default Quote, for whatever reason the ribbon happened to pop in a few milliseconds too late.

This made the test fail with the message "Unable to find the ribbon" (method IsButtonAvailable() in CommandBarActions.cs). Some form of delay/ rechecking would be helpful in such cases.

Sometimes an entity can have multiple forms configured in a model app. Support testing on multiple forms or some sort of form selection

Opening an entity will go to the current URL. See microsoft/EasyRepro#439

Design issue. Move to seperate context or with CrmTestingContext

Currently a deployment package is used for deployment. This isn't really a good solution.

Use a proper YAML pipeline for Azure DevOps.
Add the extracted solution to source control, so anyone can pack and import this package

When running locally the Path.Combine causes a nullreferenceexception

The references for sales order conversion should be able to be used even if UCIOnly is set to false.

To prevent any unauthorized nuget pushes

Some forms have quick create forms. These can be used instead of regular forms.

• Keep in mind related records
• Prefer is when available? Or maybe via a tag to prefer quick creates?

I just wanted to point out that this project does not have a license file. I also did not see a license for the NuGet package. This makes it difficult to determine whether this code and/or NuGet package can be used as part of other projects.

Currently in EasyRepro it just selects option X, while in this project we know the actual GUID of the record. Implement the following logic:

• Open lookup dialog (GUIDs are only available in that dialog)
• Search for the name of the record
• browse through the griditems until the matching record is found

Implemented a workaround until microsoft/EasyRepro#749 is approved and available via NuGet.

Workaround: https://github.com/mVermaat/Crm.Specflow/blob/master/Vermaat.Crm.Specflow/EasyRepro/TemporaryFixes.cs (SetValueFix for DateTime)

Extra check before removing: Keys.Tab was also added to make saving of the last field possible

Affects the following steps: Convert to sales order, Revise quote

Both steps trigger a refresh, the wait implementation is unstable and sometimes fails. Need to find a better way than this.

I am trying to verify that the correct fields are visible on a form, but am having some trouble with record setup. Since the records are created via integration and have forms that are completely read-only, they cannot be created through the UI.

Is there a way to set up data through the API and then test the form field visibility using the UI as part of a single test? I reviewed the code and do not see a simple way to do this.

Seperate by ;
Trim extra spaces

Screenshots of failed tests are taken and placed into the test result folder, however these screenshots aren't added to the cases in Azure DevOps

Add an option to revise a quote

Lookups must be selected by GUID. EasyRepro only has methods to select lookups by label.

{subordindateAlias} is fully merged into {targetAlias}
Merge one record into another using the merge command available on Accounts, Contacts, Leads and Cases. All fields that aren't empty will be pushed to the target record. If you want to use a selection of fields, use the step below.

The following fields of {subordindateAlias} are fully merged into {targetAlias}
Merge one record into another using the merge command available on Accounts, Contacts, Leads and Cases. The fields supplied in the table will be pushed to the target. It won't filter out empty fields.

EasyRepro clicks next to checkboxes, other type of twooptions seems to work fine. Custom code implemented until EasyRepro fix. See microsoft/EasyRepro#404

Check if a field on a form is optional, required or recommended.

When checknig form state for locked fields, all fields will be 'unlocked' because the form is read-only.

Can't login with user with client secrets.

In the Casablanca TimeZone the UTC conversion doesn't work properly. Use 'ConvertTimeToUtc(DateTime, TimeZoneInfo)' instead.

Currently the XPATH is a GUID and this isn't a good check. EasyRepro has good XPATH queries. Use that instead.

When using the nuget build pipeline, the nuget package creates a prerelease version. Even for pull requests. It should only build on branches. Secondary the nuget version must include the branch name for identification

Updating values doesn't clear values,. See microsoft/EasyRepro#394

Is this meant to be DLF?

Originally posted by @thathi in #35

Default values from DefaultData.xml isn't included in UI tests when creating new records

The following step fails with the error below. This appears to be because in my target environment, the "Job Title" field is in the form header.

Step

Given a contact named TestContact with the following values
    | Property   | Value |
    | First Name | John  |
    | Last Name  | Smith |
    | Job Title  | CLO   |

Exception

OpenQA.Selenium.WebDriverException
  HResult=0x80131500
  Message=javascript error: Cannot read property 'getName' of null
  (Session info: chrome=80.0.3987.163)
  Source=WebDriver
  StackTrace:
   at OpenQA.Selenium.Remote.RemoteWebDriver.UnpackAndThrowOnError(Response errorResponse)
   at OpenQA.Selenium.Remote.RemoteWebDriver.Execute(String driverCommandToExecute, Dictionary`2 parameters)
   at OpenQA.Selenium.Remote.RemoteWebDriver.ExecuteScriptCommand(String script, String commandName, Object[] args)
   at OpenQA.Selenium.Remote.RemoteWebDriver.ExecuteScript(String script, Object[] args)
   at Microsoft.Dynamics365.UIAutomation.Browser.SeleniumExtensions.ExecuteScript(IWebDriver driver, String script, Object[] args)
   at Vermaat.Crm.Specflow.EasyRepro.FormField.GetTabName() in C:\Projects\open-source\Crm.Specflow\Vermaat.Crm.Specflow\EasyRepro\FormField.cs:line 98
   at Vermaat.Crm.Specflow.EasyRepro.FormData.FillForm(CrmTestingContext crmContext, Table formData) in C:\Projects\open-source\Crm.Specflow\Vermaat.Crm.Specflow\EasyRepro\FormData.cs:line 95
   at Vermaat.Crm.Specflow.Commands.CreateRecordCommand.ExecuteBrowser() in C:\Projects\open-source\Crm.Specflow\Vermaat.Crm.Specflow\Commands\CreateRecordCommand.cs:line 36
   at Vermaat.Crm.Specflow.Commands.BrowserCommandFunc`1.Execute(CommandAction commandAction) in C:\Projects\open-source\Crm.Specflow\Vermaat.Crm.Specflow\Commands\BrowserCommand.cs:line 29
   at Vermaat.Crm.Specflow.CommandProcessor.Execute[TResult](ICommandFunc`1 command, CommandAction commandAction) in C:\Projects\open-source\Crm.Specflow\Vermaat.Crm.Specflow\CommandProcessor.cs:line 55
   at Vermaat.Crm.Specflow.CommandProcessor.Execute[TResult](ICommandFunc`1 command) in C:\Projects\open-source\Crm.Specflow\Vermaat.Crm.Specflow\CommandProcessor.cs:line 47
   at Vermaat.Crm.Specflow.Steps.GeneralSteps.GivenEntityWithValues(String entityName, String alias, Table criteria) in C:\Projects\open-source\Crm.Specflow\Vermaat.Crm.Specflow\Steps\GeneralSteps.cs:line 40

Temporary fix already implemented until EasyRepro is fixed. See: microsoft/EasyRepro#375

Currently some required data is not automatically imported and causes tests to fail on a clean environment. Add a step to import that data.

Temporary fix in place until microsoft/EasyRepro#627 is fixed. PR createad for easyrepro

It's possible for Azure DevOps runs to get the driver path dynamically via an environment variable. See microsoft/EasyRepro#699

See #38

Modifications in place until microsoft/EasyRepro#631 is fixed

Is it possible to check whether a subgrid or section is visible on a form?

I saw the form state command. But, it looks like it only returns attributes.

Can't login with UCI, wrong XPath search values. See microsoft/EasyRepro#426

In some edge cases it can happen that a value isn't set properly. This usually happens if fields are being set fast. In example

Using the follow table as values for a record and there is client side functionality that defaults the price of the product. What sometimes happens now is that while the software tries to write 100, the default price 50 is set. This causes the end result of 50100.

@mVermaat i am going to use your repo for my project. can you help me to configure it with Nunit.

Currently on initialization a CrmTestingContext instance is created and in the connection with the CRM API is setup in the constructor. This means you cannot change the credentials at runtime.

Check if a field is locked or unlocked on a form

Look for a new library or write a simplified version myself