All participants should have the right to deny publication about umklapp_site HOT 9 OPEN

Do you mean what the title says now?

from umklapp_site.

In light of pull request #26, wouldn't it make more sense to allow all users to de-anonymize their parts but leave the right to publish at the story starter?

from umklapp_site.

I'm not sure about this.

• Is there any point in de-anonymizing? Personally, I don't care about who wrote what in stories I did not participate in.
• It might take a long time until every participant has acknowledged publication. Currently, the story starter can quickly publish it after it finished.
• What if I wrote something, I regret writing? Not making it public is only a first step. In addition I would like to anonymize it even for my co-writers. However, if I'm the only anonymized, it is not anonymous at all.

from umklapp_site.

Is there any point in de-anonymizing? Personally, I don't care about who wrote what in stories I did not participate in.

I just thought that if one of the participants really want everybody to know that this ingenious story part came from them, why not let them de-anonymize their parts?
But maybe this feature is not that demanded right now...Also, if some participants de-anonimize, this could incur social pressure on the other participants, which I do not really want.

It might take a long time until every participant has acknowledged publication. Currently, the story starter can quickly publish it after it finished.

Right, this can be annoying.

What if I wrote something, I regret writing? Not making it public is only a first step. In addition I would like to anonymize it even for my co-writers. However, if I'm the only anonymized, it is not anonymous at all.

A solution for that would be that every author has the right to anonymize the story entirely, even for the co-authors...

from umklapp_site.

Or simply prominently warn the users that stories will possibility be publicly visible?

from umklapp_site.

Warnings and prompts are usually ignored.

from umklapp_site.

Or maybe decide at story creation time whether it is supposed to be a private thing, or public? Like on Facebook...

from umklapp_site.

Let's make it a tip then ;-)

Am 4. Juni 2016 19:49:02 MESZ, schrieb Andreas Zwinkau [email protected]:

Warnings and prompts are usually ignored.

---

You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#27 (comment)

Mit meinem Hosaka 9000 gesendet

from umklapp_site.

Or maybe decide at story creation time whether it is supposed to be a private thing, or public? Like on Facebook...

I also thought about something like this. Additionally, the others should maybe get the right to veto, if the story creator has decided the story to be public. Every contributor can exercise this right at any time.

from umklapp_site.