I see this on my metadata page: https://microbadger.com/#/images/jimschubert/8-jdk-alpine-mvn

These images look like they were pulled from ImageLayers.io. The left circled image references a commit badge, which isn't available in the badges selection just above where the screenshot was taken. Navigating to the location the commit batch would be (https://images.microbadger.com/badges/commit/jimschubert/8-jdk-alpine-mvn.svg) there's no commit hash.

Hello,

there is no layer info after rebuild again. The existing web hooks worked correctly about two days ago. Could you please check the accetto's repositories again? Thanks a lot.

Cheers
accetto

Not sure if this is the correct place to raise this issue, let me know if I need to report this issue elsewhere. The image absolutely, positively, exists :)

Sites like GitHub/GitLab support multiple markup languages, such as Markdown and Asciidoc. While Markdown is more widely used, there are at least some people who are using Asciidoc (and other formats) to write documentation.
It would be great if based on the file extension of a README, microbadger would provide the correct snippet to include a badge in the README. Example for Markdown (current default):

[![](https://images.microbadger.com/badges/image/ORGA/PROJECT.svg)](https://microbadger.com/images/ORGA/PROJECT "Get your own image badge on microbadger.com")

Example for Asciidoc:

image:https://images.microbadger.com/badges/image/ORGA/PROJECT.svg["Get your own image badge on microbadger.com", link="https://microbadger.com/images/ORGA/PROJECT"]

I want to use the webhook to update the info for a large set of images. Is there a URL that only contains the repo name and not the stuff afterwards? It would be tedious to get the webhook URL from your web page for every image:

https://hooks.microbadger.com/images/rscohn2/idp2_core.ubuntu/KToFO4mXwId81ddvWhWdxivWAHU=

For over a year, I have never seen layer information for our official docker hub image.
A year or more ago, I remember it was working, but for the last year it stopped reporting layers size, etc:
https://microbadger.com/images/library/ros

Layer information not yet retrieved

Perhaps you could look into internally, perhaps reset it's cache?

For https://microbadger.com/images/cometvisu/cometvisu and it's different versions/tags of https://hub.docker.com/r/cometvisu/cometvisu/ I get no layer information as it's allways saying No matching base image?

Thanks for this awesome service!

We are planning to create a badge hosting for microbadger, while currently the api response is quite slow:

• https://api.microbadger.com/v1/images/node
• https://api.microbadger.com/v1/images/elasticsearch
• https://api.microbadger.com/v1/images/mhart/alpine-node

Is there any plan on optimizing this? I think a handy CDN cache would be a great help.

see https://microbadger.com/images/reactnativecommunity/react-native-android

A Badge which shows the latest Build status of the given image if automated build is enabled.

Manual
Queued
Building
Sucess
Error

Hi,

My name’s Quentin Machu and I am the primary maintainer of Clair, an open source project for the static analysis of vulnerabilities in containers. The project, first released in November 2015, aims at bringing security awareness to every container users.

I think that the service that microbadger provides fits nicely with the whole idea and design of Clair, that analyzes container images layer by layer, and that is able to inform about the number of packages/vulnerabilities added/updated/removed in each of them. Integrating Clair into microbadger would provide an extremely valuable piece of information!

If you're interested and would like to learn more, I am open to discussion. You can reach me on this thread, by e-mail or on IRC (#clair on Freenode). Also, few presentations are available at the very end of the Clair's README. The latest available slidedeck is the one that I've used for the O'Reilly Security Conference in Amsterdam, the video is not yet available though.

Thank you.

I added the labels as suggested and setup a webhook from DockerHub to update the badge. After the push the page is broken.

https://microbadger.com/images/redsift/dnstrace

Hi,

I'm trying to get badges for https://hub.docker.com/r/crazymax/rtorrent-rutorrent/, which exists, but https://microbadger.com/images/crazymax/rtorrent-rutorrent incorrectly returns "crazymax/rtorrent-rutorrent not found on Docker Hub".

Microbadger retrieved repos data from Docker when the certain repo was created but an image wasn't still pushed. And now I get an error "izonder/lanny not found on Docker Hub", but it exists.

Hi.

I used the "Get the webhook" tab when logged on to your service. When I attempt to paste the resulting POST URL (https://hooks.microbadger.com/imag...) into the Webhooks settings for my project on Docker Hub, I receive "Valid URL required" when attempting to add it.

It turns out that this is due to the '=' sign being present in the final part of the URL, and not URL-encoded. Replacing '=' with %3d seems to work.

I have tagged versions of a docker image which actually have different builds eg. CentOS, Debian, Ubuntu and would like to be able to link to the details for each one separately as they're stored in different folders in my project eg. https://github.com/HariSekhon/Dockerfiles/tree/master/nagios-plugins-centos vs https://github.com/HariSekhon/Dockerfiles/tree/master/nagios-plugins-ubuntu

I noticed that e-mail addresses had their domain part scrambled in the MAINTAINER tag or in the image's layers display...

Example with this image : https://microbadger.com/images/peterthecoon/cronicle

But for e-mail addresses stored in Labels they are displayed in plain text, in the resulting table, without scrambling, and e-mail address enclosed in < and > aren't even escaped and are added as HTML content !

Example here : https://microbadger.com/images/puppet/puppetserver

This should probably need a fix.

Hello

It worked yesterday, but today it does not with this and any other image in this repository.

Is there anything I should do or should I simply wait?
Does it require yout intervention or does it recover itself?

Thanks

my image is 15.3 MB but the micro badger shows it as 0 bytes and 7 layers.

https://microbadger.com/images/k8guard/k8guard-report

and also says "layer information not yet retrieved"
I also setup the webhook so each time it gets built in docker hub to call microbadger, but that didnt help to fix it.

could it be because I am using multi stage docker file build ?
here is my dockerfile
https://github.com/k8guard/k8guard-report/blob/master/Dockerfile

Hello,

Issues similar to those described in #29 seem to keep on happening repeatedly. For instance the metadata for this centos image is missing all size information and is displaying "Layer information not yet retrieved". Nevertheless, this image version was built around a month ago and MicroBadger claims that it was "Last inspected 3 days ago.".

A lot of images are facing this same issue. Calling the webhook seems to temporarily solve the issue (I've just managed to get the size information back on jumanjiman/puppet using this technique) but the metadata often disappears again without any changes actually being made to the image. See the comment here for a slightly more detailed description of the problem.

Thanks in advance for looking into this.

Cheers,

Pyves

To see my images, I need to provide my username and password. How is this dealt with? Is this stored in a database on your end?

Relevant: #30

Looks like layer information isn't being pulled. I've got two images here and here without it.

It seems stuck in an endless loop on badger. 30 minutes so far to gather metadata!

https://microbadger.com/images/hongkongkiwi/shadowsocks-libev-client

Hi,
I use microbadger in my docker images.

But one image cannot create badge.

Processing forumi0721archx64/arch-x64-dev metadata

Almost day..... Something wrong at create logic.
Please check this.

It only shows the layer numbers but not detailed layer information for my docker image esir/docker-efb. I have tried to google a solution but no luck. Please help to investigate, thanks.

Dear all,
I have a question, I’ve pushed a new image on the docker hub, version 0.4.1 on https://hub.docker.com/r/lfoppiano/grobid/tags/ but I cannot find it in the relative page of microbadger: https://microbadger.com/images/lfoppiano/grobid.

According to docker hub the webshook was triggered correctly:

ac54bb7342e74b9abcc598c996b9e37c
success
10/03/16 15:26

How long does it take to refresh the microbadger image?

Thanks
Luca

circleci/php image repository is not found here: https://microbadger.com/images/circleci/php
The repository exists on Docker Hub.

I just tried to analyse the Docker image microsoft/nanoserver to get an overview about the content layers and sizes, but I only got an error message.

microsoft/nanoserver not found on Docker Hub
We couldn’t find the image on Docker Hub. Let us know if you’d like support for a different image registry.

Right now it seems that these images are not supported by Microbadger. I know these images are not stored directly on the Docker Hub, they are stored in a linked repository. But we can easily search them through the Docker Hub, but a pull is only possible from a Windows machine. So I guess the registry API handles them differently.

$ docker search microsoft/nanoserver
NAME                   DESCRIPTION                                     STARS     OFFICIAL   AUTOMATED
microsoft/nanoserver   Windows Server 2016 Nano Server base OS im...   88

I'm trying to get badges for https://hub.docker.com/r/gonitro/envoy-ui/, which exists, but https://microbadger.com/images/gonitro/envoy-ui incorrectly returns gonitro/envoy-ui not found on Docker Hub .

hi
I use microbadger many repository.
But 1 repo cannot finish processing.

What's the wrong?

https://microbadger.com/images/forumi0721archx64build/arch-x64-dev-android

The image exists on docker hub but isn't being shown on micro badger.

Dockerhub URL: https://hub.docker.com/r/viperdev/thumbor-s3/
Microbadger URL: https://microbadger.com/images/viperdev/thumbor-s3

Seperate actual image size and base image size. Display if this is based on the recent popular base image (like alpine, debian or buildpack-deps:curl). This will reward people using automated builds or run their build continuously since many images on docker hub are build only once and have old base images. In that case docker's layer cake system which can reuse disk space for many images does not help.

Also recent images increase security!

New feature request

Suggested by @frol here: microscaling/imagelayers-graph#85 (comment)

Awesome product!

but I got a problem with the commit badge!

where as:

does work,

is this because org.label-schema.vcs-ref is not used, but in stead the automated docker build git commit is?

PS: https://microbadger.com/images/microscaling/microbadger has also no commit badge!

I also tried by adding git_commit label but in vain, see https://microbadger.com/images/dgoo2308/test-docker-api

https://hub.docker.com/r/nextjournal/ubuntu-language-base

This image is public, but I can't load it on the Microbadger site:

nextjournal/ubuntu-language-base not found on Docker Hub

Hi,

Thanks for this project!

Since our last release, somehow the badge for the image version seems broken, we have not been able to understand why. Perhaps you can give us a hand?

https://microbadger.com/images/dosel/zalenium

Thanks in advance,

Hey,
i would like to see the current version of an image in a badge. At the moment we got version: latest. A better option would to support it with an explicit version version: 0.0.0 when the correct label is in the dockerfile. An example would be something like

LABEL org.label-schema.version=$VERSION

WDYT ?

Unable to send test notification to Slack, I added the webhook URL clicked 'Test' and it says 'Notification Sent' but nothing appears in the channel. I think this is due to the curl request as when I do it manually using the same web-hook URL it works. The curl request i used is:
curl -X POST --data-urlencode "payload={\"text\":\"Hi, it's MicroBadger, sending you a test notification for alpine https://microbadger.com/images/alpine\",\"new_tags\":[],\"image_name\":\"alpine\",\"changed_tags\":[],\"deleted_tags\":[]}" https://hooks.slack.com/services/${WEBHOOK_URL}

I cannot view CS50 ide-offline's labels. The website says it wasn't found.

Is it because the Dockerfile is private?

https://microbadger.com/labels currently still refers to the Label Schema labels, but those have been deprecated in favor of OCI annotations.

It would be nice to have support for both the legacy Label Schema keys and their OCI replacements, e.g. org.label-schema.vcs-ref and org.opencontainers.image.revision should be recognized as equivalent.

There's a useful table here:

https://github.com/opencontainers/image-spec/blob/master/annotations.md#back-compatibility-with-label-schema

The certificate for https://microbadger.com/ expired on 2018-07-03T12:00:00Z.

$ echo | openssl s_client -servername microbadger.com -connect microbadger.com:443 2>/dev/null | openssl x509 -noout -dates
notBefore=Jun  3 00:00:00 2017 GMT
notAfter=Jul  3 12:00:00 2018 GMT

Hi

I am having some issues with my docker image https://hub.docker.com/r/microros/client_stm32-e407/
Microbadger site claims it cannot find it, but it exists on Docker Hub https://microbadger.com/images/microros/client_stm32-e407/

Thanks

Looks like it's possible to select tags from a dropdown list, but the badge image url stays the same (and shows the "latest" tag).

Is this a bug or a missing feature?

It would be great to have different styles to choose from in order to stay uniform with existing badges.

e.g. like Shields

Plastic:
Flat:
Flat-Square:

My image codeworksio/streaming-server does not refresh since yesterday despite the fact I pushed number of commits in the meantime. Docker Hub repository is current and builds images automatically as expected.

I use the following command curl --request POST "https://hooks.microbadger.com/images/codeworksio/streaming-server/o6WEpIkU6QkdRAOuZ9EcPx6djOo=" to notify MicroBadger about my changes.

After uploading a container Github & Docker Hub I received an unsolicited email from Anne Currie [email protected] regarding a badge for my image. I've marked the email as spam, as there was no unsubscribe options given. Please stop doing this.

We would appreciate if the notification was much better including the published version and labels support. We use the notifications as the release publishing mechanism for our product and the current thing does not tell anything to our customers about what changed.

Hi! I push an image on the Docker Hub (https://hub.docker.com/r/skynewz/cr3dov3r) at 6pm and I can't see it on Microbadger. Can you help me please ? Otherwise, I can see all my other image

If I insert two badges in one line (e.g. version and layer), there are not properly aligned vertically (1px difference). Tested on Chromium 44.0.2394.0.

Screenshot with described behavior:

BTW, great idea and service 👍