meepingsnesroms / mu Goto Github PK
View Code? Open in Web Editor NEWA new Palm OS emulator targeting compatibility, speed and accuracy in that order.
Home Page: https://meepingsnesroms.github.io/
A new Palm OS emulator targeting compatibility, speed and accuracy in that order.
Home Page: https://meepingsnesroms.github.io/
The cause is unknown but was associated with building outside Qt Creator.
The used ROM may also play a role.
Have folders of apps in the resource directory(either RetroArch ./system or QT ~/Mu) named "sysApps" that are always installed when launching an app, could be useful for things like MultiUserHack or ChangeName and Filez is nice too if you want to edit or copy anything.
sysApps.os5 will have the OS 5 apps, sysApps.os4 will have the OS 4 apps.
HowToUseRamBuilder.txt
n/a
See above.
palmos41-en-m515.rom: 412557a221933a8be12622de7a21320a (MD5)
and
palmos41-en-m515.rom: 83cb1d1c76e568b916dc2e7c0bf669f6 (MD5)
bootloader-en-m515.rom: 9da101cd2317830649a31f8fa46debec (MD5)
1.7.6 does at least boot the Palm ROM that I have.
The .ram files created on the content directory of Retroarch's build are about 16 MB for every lauched file. If they could be compressed, that'd be awesome.
Japanese ROMs I am aware of
None of these work with Mu at the moment.
But, my goal is to play this game: 掌花札 (Palm Hanafuda)
The game plays but the text is not readable.
Not sure how legal these are?
They came with the book PalmPilot The Ultimate Guide 2nd Edition
and the files are available here:
https://resources.oreilly.com/examples/9781565926004/tree/master/compressed_files/Palm_OS_Emulator_Win
Palm 5.4 Simulator contained some:
https://palmarchive.com/files/?dir=LukeLC%27s%20Archive/Simulator/PalmOS%20Garnet%205.4%20Simulator/Release
NOTE: These do not currently work with Mu.
Using palmos41-en-m515.rom and Retroarch's build.
The current mapping isn't optimal for playing games, as pressing retropad A would move left and retropad B would move right.
I've tested many games and all of them used the Date Book to move LEFT and Address Book to move Right. So I'd suggest to change the current mapping between these two:
https://github.com/meepingsnesroms/Mu/blob/master/libretroBuildSystem/libretro.c#L230-L231
That way, RETRO_DEVICE_ID_JOYPAD_A
would be Address Book
and RETRO_DEVICE_ID_JOYPAD_B
would be Date Book
Using Retroarch's build, it is impossible to go through the configuration process of the Graffiti app on palm OS 4. It has to do with the touchscreen sensitivity I suppose, as to navigation through the home screen without changing the page you'll have to move the joystick slowly.
This is about as nitpicky as they come, so I apologize in advance. I've had issues loading the .pro
file locally if I try to use the checked in .pro.user
settings file. I have to wipe it out each time in order for things to run. It might be worthwhile to add the user settings to .gitignore
. This will also make some of the commits less packed.
Hello guicrith,
i remember when you were working on PersianTree before it eventually became this, pretty nice progress so far ! However, one thing i did not notice was the license...
I won't go around the bushes, it's a major turn off for me. Such a license would also prevent it from being bundled with linux distributions.
I don't know your exact motives but just in case you did it in case someone else would take your work and profit off of it :
It's likely that such license is going to be ineffective at it.
The non-commercial license for Snes9x was ignored by most "emulation boxes" and you'll always have scums like DamonPS2 violating GPL anyway. (even though they could still make money off of it, but they don't want to share the source, violating the license still)
It's the reason why MAME dropped their old license, as it was never enforced and indeed some deemed it to be unenforceable. The moment they changed the license, they finally started to get credits for their work.
The only thing it will do is to punish legitimate users, which is why i would like you to reconsider the license. I would probably recommend the GPLv3+, since it requires modifications to be made public, along with other restrictions.
Some apps require the HotSync ID (username, kind of) to be able to be registered successfully.
I suspect it needs Japanese ROM 3.1?
palmos41-en-m515.rom: 83cb1d1c76e568b916dc2e7c0bf669f6 (MD5)
bootloader-en-m515.rom: 9da101cd2317830649a31f8fa46debec (MD5)
[今すぐダウンロード!]
link next to app/game version numberHi again! I'd like to know how can I activate the SD card and define an specific path for it, as I've seen many games that need to have stuff like level packs or similar in SD:\PALM\Programs\...
and I'd like to point, in recalbox's case, to recalbox/share/roms/palm
directory. That way users could just create a folder with the requited stuff inside of .../roms/palm/
Is that possible?
The required resource directory QDir::homePath() + "/Mu"
does not seem to be automatically created on first run, instead it throws a generic "emulation error 4".
System info:
Ubuntu MATE x64 18.04
Qt Creator 4.7.0
Based on Qt 5.11.1 (GCC 5.3.1 20160406 (Red Hat 5.3.1-6), 64 bit)
Built on Jul 17 2018 04:23:40
From revision dedbb40f57
https://palmdb.net/1869/mills-bardman-japanese/
I'd love to play this on Nintendo 3DS, with device rotated 90' so it's using the touch screen
It only displays on the top screen at the moment so there is no touch?
Where can I download these files:
palmos40-en-m500.rom: f50e4d5e4d98dc831f2c34a9107651eb (MD5)
palmos41-en-m515.rom: 83cb1d1c76e568b916dc2e7c0bf669f6 (MD5)
palmos52-en-t3.rom: de46ec84d9aabf655eabdf9b00a3845d (MD5)
bootloader-dbvz.rom: 9da101cd2317830649a31f8fa46debec (MD5)
Don't know GitHub very well
Arch
gcc 7.3.1+20180406-1
[parker@inspiron15 build]$ git clone https://github.com/meepingsnesroms/libretro-palmm515emu
Cloning into 'libretro-palmm515emu'...
remote: Counting objects: 1417, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (284/284), done.
remote: Total 1417 (delta 259), reused 210 (delta 99), pack-reused 1033
Receiving objects: 100% (1417/1417), 54.30 MiB | 3.01 MiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (897/897), done.
[parker@inspiron15 build]$ cd libretro-palmm515emu/
[parker@inspiron15 libretro-palmm515emu]$ cd libretroBuildSystem/
[parker@inspiron15 libretroBuildSystem]$ make
cc -I./libretro-common/include -O2 -DNDEBUG -DGIT_VERSION=\"" cf71e93"\" -DINLINE="static inline" -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-uninitialized -fPIC -c -olibretro.o libretro.c
In file included from libretro.c:10:0:
./libretro-common/include/retro_miscellaneous.h:52:1: error: duplicate ‘static’
static INLINE void bits_or_bits(uint32_t *a, uint32_t *b, uint32_t count)
^~~~~~
./libretro-common/include/retro_miscellaneous.h:59:1: error: duplicate ‘static’
static INLINE void bits_clear_bits(uint32_t *a, uint32_t *b, uint32_t count)
^~~~~~
./libretro-common/include/retro_miscellaneous.h:66:1: error: duplicate ‘static’
static INLINE bool bits_any_set(uint32_t* ptr, uint32_t count)
^~~~~~
make: *** [Makefile.libretro:487: libretro.o] Error 1
Currently cursor moves the focus around the buttons, and you have to click with the mouse or press space.
I have got around this by using external software to map key presses to mouse clicks, but it would be great if it was built-in.
Was wondering if there was a way to Install Palm OS .prc Files?
as title.
The way I would expect it working would be:
It's odd, but given my experience with the PX68k core, RetroArch users do not seem to want persistent devices (even if that's how they are IRL) but rather a core as a device for running a game/app in demand.
In one of the recent updates, it seems like the bootloader was added as a requirement for running the program. It might be useful to add those setup instructions (add files to whatever folder) to the main README.
Also, since the other issue about qmake was closed, it might also be helpful to update the "build without Qt Creator" instructions to use qmake CONFIG+=debug
instead of just qmake
.
as title
The way I would expect it working would be:
It's odd, but given my experience with the PX68k core, RetroArch users do not seem to want persistent devices (even if that's how they are IRL) but rather a core as a device for running a game/app in demand.
Arch
gcc 8.1.1+20180531-1
[parker@e55 build]$ git clone https://github.com/meepingsnesroms/libretro-palmm515emu
Cloning into 'libretro-palmm515emu'...
remote: Counting objects: 3613, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (78/78), done.
remote: Total 3613 (delta 59), reused 84 (delta 42), pack-reused 3490
Receiving objects: 100% (3613/3613), 74.66 MiB | 12.67 MiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (2472/2472), done.
[parker@e55 build]$ cd libretro-palmm515emu/libretroBuildSystem/
[parker@e55 libretroBuildSystem]$ make -j2
cc -I./libretro-common/include -O2 -DNDEBUG -DGIT_VERSION=\"" f4873e0"\" -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-uninitialized -fPIC -c -olibretro.o libretro.c
cc -I./libretro-common/include -O2 -DNDEBUG -DGIT_VERSION=\"" f4873e0"\" -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-uninitialized -fPIC -c -o../src/emulator.o ../src/emulator.c
cc -I./libretro-common/include -O2 -DNDEBUG -DGIT_VERSION=\"" f4873e0"\" -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-uninitialized -fPIC -c -o../src/memoryAccess.o ../src/memoryAccess.c
In file included from ../src/emulator.h:13,
from ../src/memoryAccess.c:4:
../src/memoryAccess.c: In function ‘ramRead8’:
../src/memoryAccess.h:31:90: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘-’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_READ_8(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask) segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask]
../src/memoryAccess.c:15:57: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_READ_8’
static inline uint8_t ramRead8(uint32_t address){return BUFFER_READ_8(palmRam, address, chips[CHIP_D_RAM].start, chips[CHIP_D_RAM].mask);}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/memoryAccess.c: In function ‘ramRead16’:
../src/memoryAccess.h:32:91: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘-’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_READ_16(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] << 8 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask])
../src/memoryAccess.c:16:59: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_READ_16’
static inline uint16_t ramRead16(uint32_t address){return BUFFER_READ_16(palmRam, address, chips[CHIP_D_RAM].start, chips[CHIP_D_RAM].mask);}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ../src/emulator.h:13,
from ../src/memoryAccess.c:4:
../src/memoryAccess.h:32:158: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘+’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_READ_16(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] << 8 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask])
../src/memoryAccess.c:16:59: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_READ_16’
static inline uint16_t ramRead16(uint32_t address){return BUFFER_READ_16(palmRam, address, chips[CHIP_D_RAM].start, chips[CHIP_D_RAM].mask);}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/memoryAccess.c: In function ‘ramRead32’:
../src/memoryAccess.h:33:91: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘-’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_READ_32(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] << 24 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask] << 16 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 2 & mask] << 8 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 3 & mask])
../src/memoryAccess.c:17:59: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_READ_32’
static inline uint32_t ramRead32(uint32_t address){return BUFFER_READ_32(palmRam, address, chips[CHIP_D_RAM].start, chips[CHIP_D_RAM].mask);}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/memoryAccess.h:33:159: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘+’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_READ_32(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] << 24 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask] << 16 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 2 & mask] << 8 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 3 & mask])
../src/memoryAccess.c:17:59: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_READ_32’
static inline uint32_t ramRead32(uint32_t address){return BUFFER_READ_32(palmRam, address, chips[CHIP_D_RAM].start, chips[CHIP_D_RAM].mask);}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/memoryAccess.h:33:216: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘+’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_READ_32(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] << 24 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask] << 16 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 2 & mask] << 8 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 3 & mask])
../src/memoryAccess.c:17:59: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_READ_32’
static inline uint32_t ramRead32(uint32_t address){return BUFFER_READ_32(palmRam, address, chips[CHIP_D_RAM].start, chips[CHIP_D_RAM].mask);}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ../src/emulator.h:13,
from ../src/memoryAccess.c:4:
../src/memoryAccess.h:33:272: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘+’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
s, startAddress, mask) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] << 24 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask] << 16 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 2 & mask] << 8 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 3 & mask])
../src/memoryAccess.c:17:59: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_READ_32’
static inline uint32_t ramRead32(uint32_t address){return BUFFER_READ_32(palmRam, address, chips[CHIP_D_RAM].start, chips[CHIP_D_RAM].mask);}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/memoryAccess.c: In function ‘ramWrite8’:
../src/memoryAccess.h:34:98: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘-’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_WRITE_8(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask, value) segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] = value
../src/memoryAccess.c:18:63: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_WRITE_8’
static inline void ramWrite8(uint32_t address, uint8_t value){BUFFER_WRITE_8(palmRam, address, chips[CHIP_D_RAM].start, chips[CHIP_D_RAM].mask, value);}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/memoryAccess.c: In function ‘ramWrite16’:
../src/memoryAccess.h:35:99: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘-’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_WRITE_16(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask, value) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] = value >> 8, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask] = value & 0xFF)
../src/memoryAccess.c:19:65: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_WRITE_16’
static inline void ramWrite16(uint32_t address, uint16_t value){BUFFER_WRITE_16(palmRam, address, chips[CHIP_D_RAM].start, chips[CHIP_D_RAM].mask, value);}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/memoryAccess.h:35:173: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘+’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_WRITE_16(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask, value) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] = value >> 8, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask] = value & 0xFF)
../src/memoryAccess.c:19:65: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_WRITE_16’
static inline void ramWrite16(uint32_t address, uint16_t value){BUFFER_WRITE_16(palmRam, address, chips[CHIP_D_RAM].start, chips[CHIP_D_RAM].mask, value);}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/memoryAccess.c: In function ‘ramWrite32’:
../src/memoryAccess.h:36:99: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘-’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_WRITE_32(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask, value) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] = value >> 24, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask] = (value >> 16) & 0xFF, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 2 & mask] = (value >> 8) & 0xFF, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 3 & mask] = value & 0xFF)
../src/memoryAccess.c:20:65: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_WRITE_32’
static inline void ramWrite32(uint32_t address, uint32_t value){BUFFER_WRITE_32(palmRam, address, chips[CHIP_D_RAM].start, chips[CHIP_D_RAM].mask, value);}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/memoryAccess.h:36:174: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘+’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_WRITE_32(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask, value) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] = value >> 24, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask] = (value >> 16) & 0xFF, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 2 & mask] = (value >> 8) & 0xFF, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 3 & mask] = value & 0xFF)
../src/memoryAccess.c:20:65: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_WRITE_32’
static inline void ramWrite32(uint32_t address, uint32_t value){BUFFER_WRITE_32(palmRam, address, chips[CHIP_D_RAM].start, chips[CHIP_D_RAM].mask, value);}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/memoryAccess.h:36:247: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘+’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
E_32(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask, value) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] = value >> 24, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask] = (value >> 16) & 0xFF, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 2 & mask] = (value >> 8) & 0xFF, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 3 & mask] = value & 0xFF)
../src/memoryAccess.c:20:65: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_WRITE_32’
static inline void ramWrite32(uint32_t address, uint32_t value){BUFFER_WRITE_32(palmRam, address, chips[CHIP_D_RAM].start, chips[CHIP_D_RAM].mask, value);}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/memoryAccess.h:36:319: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘+’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
ddress - startAddress & mask] = value >> 24, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask] = (value >> 16) & 0xFF, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 2 & mask] = (value >> 8) & 0xFF, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 3 & mask] = value & 0xFF)
../src/memoryAccess.c:20:65: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_WRITE_32’
static inline void ramWrite32(uint32_t address, uint32_t value){BUFFER_WRITE_32(palmRam, address, chips[CHIP_D_RAM].start, chips[CHIP_D_RAM].mask, value);}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ../src/emulator.h:13,
from ../src/memoryAccess.c:4:
../src/memoryAccess.c: In function ‘romRead8’:
../src/memoryAccess.h:31:90: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘-’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_READ_8(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask) segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask]
../src/memoryAccess.c:23:57: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_READ_8’
static inline uint8_t romRead8(uint32_t address){return BUFFER_READ_8(palmRom, address, chips[CHIP_A_ROM].start, chips[CHIP_A_ROM].mask);}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/memoryAccess.c: In function ‘romRead16’:
../src/memoryAccess.h:32:91: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘-’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_READ_16(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] << 8 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask])
../src/memoryAccess.c:24:59: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_READ_16’
static inline uint16_t romRead16(uint32_t address){return BUFFER_READ_16(palmRom, address, chips[CHIP_A_ROM].start, chips[CHIP_A_ROM].mask);}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ../src/emulator.h:13,
from ../src/memoryAccess.c:4:
../src/memoryAccess.h:32:158: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘+’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_READ_16(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] << 8 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask])
../src/memoryAccess.c:24:59: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_READ_16’
static inline uint16_t romRead16(uint32_t address){return BUFFER_READ_16(palmRom, address, chips[CHIP_A_ROM].start, chips[CHIP_A_ROM].mask);}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/memoryAccess.c: In function ‘romRead32’:
../src/memoryAccess.h:33:91: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘-’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_READ_32(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] << 24 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask] << 16 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 2 & mask] << 8 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 3 & mask])
../src/memoryAccess.c:25:59: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_READ_32’
static inline uint32_t romRead32(uint32_t address){return BUFFER_READ_32(palmRom, address, chips[CHIP_A_ROM].start, chips[CHIP_A_ROM].mask);}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/memoryAccess.h:33:159: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘+’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_READ_32(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] << 24 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask] << 16 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 2 & mask] << 8 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 3 & mask])
../src/memoryAccess.c:25:59: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_READ_32’
static inline uint32_t romRead32(uint32_t address){return BUFFER_READ_32(palmRom, address, chips[CHIP_A_ROM].start, chips[CHIP_A_ROM].mask);}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/memoryAccess.h:33:216: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘+’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_READ_32(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] << 24 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask] << 16 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 2 & mask] << 8 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 3 & mask])
../src/memoryAccess.c:25:59: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_READ_32’
static inline uint32_t romRead32(uint32_t address){return BUFFER_READ_32(palmRom, address, chips[CHIP_A_ROM].start, chips[CHIP_A_ROM].mask);}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ../src/emulator.h:13,
from ../src/memoryAccess.c:4:
../src/memoryAccess.h:33:272: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘+’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
s, startAddress, mask) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] << 24 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask] << 16 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 2 & mask] << 8 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 3 & mask])
../src/memoryAccess.c:25:59: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_READ_32’
static inline uint32_t romRead32(uint32_t address){return BUFFER_READ_32(palmRom, address, chips[CHIP_A_ROM].start, chips[CHIP_A_ROM].mask);}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ../src/emulator.h:13,
from ../src/memoryAccess.c:4:
../src/memoryAccess.c: In function ‘sed1376Read8’:
../src/memoryAccess.h:31:90: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘-’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_READ_8(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask) segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask]
../src/memoryAccess.c:36:14: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_READ_8’
return BUFFER_READ_8(sed1376Framebuffer, address, SED1376_FB_OFFSET, 0xFFFFFFFF);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/memoryAccess.c: In function ‘sed1376Read16’:
../src/memoryAccess.h:32:91: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘-’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_READ_16(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] << 8 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask])
../src/memoryAccess.c:46:14: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_READ_16’
return BUFFER_READ_16(sed1376Framebuffer, address, SED1376_FB_OFFSET, 0xFFFFFFFF);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ../src/emulator.h:13,
from ../src/memoryAccess.c:4:
../src/memoryAccess.h:32:158: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘+’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_READ_16(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] << 8 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask])
../src/memoryAccess.c:46:14: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_READ_16’
return BUFFER_READ_16(sed1376Framebuffer, address, SED1376_FB_OFFSET, 0xFFFFFFFF);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/memoryAccess.c: In function ‘sed1376Read32’:
../src/memoryAccess.h:33:91: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘-’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_READ_32(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] << 24 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask] << 16 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 2 & mask] << 8 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 3 & mask])
../src/memoryAccess.c:56:14: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_READ_32’
return BUFFER_READ_32(sed1376Framebuffer, address, SED1376_FB_OFFSET, 0xFFFFFFFF);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/memoryAccess.h:33:159: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘+’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_READ_32(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] << 24 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask] << 16 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 2 & mask] << 8 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 3 & mask])
../src/memoryAccess.c:56:14: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_READ_32’
return BUFFER_READ_32(sed1376Framebuffer, address, SED1376_FB_OFFSET, 0xFFFFFFFF);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/memoryAccess.h:33:216: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘+’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_READ_32(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] << 24 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask] << 16 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 2 & mask] << 8 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 3 & mask])
../src/memoryAccess.c:56:14: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_READ_32’
return BUFFER_READ_32(sed1376Framebuffer, address, SED1376_FB_OFFSET, 0xFFFFFFFF);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ../src/emulator.h:13,
from ../src/memoryAccess.c:4:
../src/memoryAccess.h:33:272: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘+’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
s, startAddress, mask) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] << 24 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask] << 16 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 2 & mask] << 8 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 3 & mask])
../src/memoryAccess.c:56:14: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_READ_32’
return BUFFER_READ_32(sed1376Framebuffer, address, SED1376_FB_OFFSET, 0xFFFFFFFF);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/memoryAccess.c: In function ‘sed1376Write8’:
../src/memoryAccess.h:34:98: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘-’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_WRITE_8(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask, value) segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] = value
../src/memoryAccess.c:64:7: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_WRITE_8’
BUFFER_WRITE_8(sed1376Framebuffer, address, SED1376_FB_OFFSET, 0xFFFFFFFF, value);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/memoryAccess.c: In function ‘sed1376Write16’:
../src/memoryAccess.h:35:99: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘-’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_WRITE_16(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask, value) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] = value >> 8, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask] = value & 0xFF)
../src/memoryAccess.c:72:7: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_WRITE_16’
BUFFER_WRITE_16(sed1376Framebuffer, address, SED1376_FB_OFFSET, 0xFFFFFFFF, value);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/memoryAccess.h:35:173: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘+’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_WRITE_16(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask, value) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] = value >> 8, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask] = value & 0xFF)
../src/memoryAccess.c:72:7: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_WRITE_16’
BUFFER_WRITE_16(sed1376Framebuffer, address, SED1376_FB_OFFSET, 0xFFFFFFFF, value);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/memoryAccess.c: In function ‘sed1376Write32’:
../src/memoryAccess.h:36:99: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘-’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_WRITE_32(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask, value) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] = value >> 24, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask] = (value >> 16) & 0xFF, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 2 & mask] = (value >> 8) & 0xFF, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 3 & mask] = value & 0xFF)
../src/memoryAccess.c:80:7: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_WRITE_32’
BUFFER_WRITE_32(sed1376Framebuffer, address, SED1376_FB_OFFSET, 0xFFFFFFFF, value);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/memoryAccess.h:36:174: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘+’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_WRITE_32(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask, value) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] = value >> 24, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask] = (value >> 16) & 0xFF, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 2 & mask] = (value >> 8) & 0xFF, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 3 & mask] = value & 0xFF)
../src/memoryAccess.c:80:7: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_WRITE_32’
BUFFER_WRITE_32(sed1376Framebuffer, address, SED1376_FB_OFFSET, 0xFFFFFFFF, value);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/memoryAccess.h:36:247: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘+’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
E_32(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask, value) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] = value >> 24, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask] = (value >> 16) & 0xFF, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 2 & mask] = (value >> 8) & 0xFF, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 3 & mask] = value & 0xFF)
../src/memoryAccess.c:80:7: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_WRITE_32’
BUFFER_WRITE_32(sed1376Framebuffer, address, SED1376_FB_OFFSET, 0xFFFFFFFF, value);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/memoryAccess.h:36:319: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘+’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
ddress - startAddress & mask] = value >> 24, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask] = (value >> 16) & 0xFF, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 2 & mask] = (value >> 8) & 0xFF, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 3 & mask] = value & 0xFF)
../src/memoryAccess.c:80:7: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_WRITE_32’
BUFFER_WRITE_32(sed1376Framebuffer, address, SED1376_FB_OFFSET, 0xFFFFFFFF, value);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc -I./libretro-common/include -O2 -DNDEBUG -DGIT_VERSION=\"" f4873e0"\" -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-uninitialized -fPIC -c -o../src/hardwareRegisters.o ../src/hardwareRegisters.c
In file included from ../src/emulator.h:13,
from ../src/hardwareRegisters.c:5:
../src/hardwareRegistersAccessors.c.h: In function ‘registerArrayRead8’:
../src/memoryAccess.h:31:90: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘-’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_READ_8(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask) segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask]
../src/hardwareRegistersAccessors.c.h:14:67: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_READ_8’
static inline uint8_t registerArrayRead8(uint32_t address){return BUFFER_READ_8(palmReg, address, 0, 0xFFF);}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/hardwareRegistersAccessors.c.h: In function ‘registerArrayRead16’:
../src/memoryAccess.h:32:91: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘-’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_READ_16(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] << 8 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask])
../src/hardwareRegistersAccessors.c.h:15:69: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_READ_16’
static inline uint16_t registerArrayRead16(uint32_t address){return BUFFER_READ_16(palmReg, address, 0, 0xFFF);}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ../src/emulator.h:13,
from ../src/hardwareRegisters.c:5:
../src/memoryAccess.h:32:158: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘+’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_READ_16(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] << 8 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask])
../src/hardwareRegistersAccessors.c.h:15:69: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_READ_16’
static inline uint16_t registerArrayRead16(uint32_t address){return BUFFER_READ_16(palmReg, address, 0, 0xFFF);}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/hardwareRegistersAccessors.c.h: In function ‘registerArrayRead32’:
../src/memoryAccess.h:33:91: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘-’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_READ_32(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] << 24 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask] << 16 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 2 & mask] << 8 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 3 & mask])
../src/hardwareRegistersAccessors.c.h:16:69: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_READ_32’
static inline uint32_t registerArrayRead32(uint32_t address){return BUFFER_READ_32(palmReg, address, 0, 0xFFF);}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/memoryAccess.h:33:159: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘+’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_READ_32(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] << 24 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask] << 16 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 2 & mask] << 8 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 3 & mask])
../src/hardwareRegistersAccessors.c.h:16:69: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_READ_32’
static inline uint32_t registerArrayRead32(uint32_t address){return BUFFER_READ_32(palmReg, address, 0, 0xFFF);}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/memoryAccess.h:33:216: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘+’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_READ_32(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] << 24 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask] << 16 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 2 & mask] << 8 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 3 & mask])
../src/hardwareRegistersAccessors.c.h:16:69: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_READ_32’
static inline uint32_t registerArrayRead32(uint32_t address){return BUFFER_READ_32(palmReg, address, 0, 0xFFF);}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ../src/emulator.h:13,
from ../src/hardwareRegisters.c:5:
../src/memoryAccess.h:33:272: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘+’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_READ_32(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] << 24 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask] << 16 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 2 & mask] << 8 | segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 3 & mask])
../src/hardwareRegistersAccessors.c.h:16:69: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_READ_32’
static inline uint32_t registerArrayRead32(uint32_t address){return BUFFER_READ_32(palmReg, address, 0, 0xFFF);}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/hardwareRegistersAccessors.c.h: In function ‘registerArrayWrite8’:
../src/memoryAccess.h:34:98: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘-’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_WRITE_8(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask, value) segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] = value
../src/hardwareRegistersAccessors.c.h:17:73: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_WRITE_8’
static inline void registerArrayWrite8(uint32_t address, uint8_t value){BUFFER_WRITE_8(palmReg, address, 0, 0xFFF, value);}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/hardwareRegistersAccessors.c.h: In function ‘registerArrayWrite16’:
../src/memoryAccess.h:35:99: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘-’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_WRITE_16(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask, value) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] = value >> 8, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask] = value & 0xFF)
../src/hardwareRegistersAccessors.c.h:18:75: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_WRITE_16’
static inline void registerArrayWrite16(uint32_t address, uint16_t value){BUFFER_WRITE_16(palmReg, address, 0, 0xFFF, value);}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/memoryAccess.h:35:173: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘+’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_WRITE_16(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask, value) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] = value >> 8, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask] = value & 0xFF)
../src/hardwareRegistersAccessors.c.h:18:75: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_WRITE_16’
static inline void registerArrayWrite16(uint32_t address, uint16_t value){BUFFER_WRITE_16(palmReg, address, 0, 0xFFF, value);}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/hardwareRegistersAccessors.c.h: In function ‘registerArrayWrite32’:
../src/memoryAccess.h:36:99: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘-’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_WRITE_32(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask, value) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] = value >> 24, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask] = (value >> 16) & 0xFF, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 2 & mask] = (value >> 8) & 0xFF, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 3 & mask] = value & 0xFF)
../src/hardwareRegistersAccessors.c.h:19:75: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_WRITE_32’
static inline void registerArrayWrite32(uint32_t address, uint32_t value){BUFFER_WRITE_32(palmReg, address, 0, 0xFFF, value);}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/memoryAccess.h:36:174: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘+’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_WRITE_32(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask, value) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] = value >> 24, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask] = (value >> 16) & 0xFF, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 2 & mask] = (value >> 8) & 0xFF, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 3 & mask] = value & 0xFF)
../src/hardwareRegistersAccessors.c.h:19:75: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_WRITE_32’
static inline void registerArrayWrite32(uint32_t address, uint32_t value){BUFFER_WRITE_32(palmReg, address, 0, 0xFFF, value);}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/memoryAccess.h:36:247: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘+’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_WRITE_32(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask, value) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] = value >> 24, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask] = (value >> 16) & 0xFF, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 2 & mask] = (value >> 8) & 0xFF, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 3 & mask] = value & 0xFF)
../src/hardwareRegistersAccessors.c.h:19:75: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_WRITE_32’
static inline void registerArrayWrite32(uint32_t address, uint32_t value){BUFFER_WRITE_32(palmReg, address, 0, 0xFFF, value);}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/memoryAccess.h:36:319: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘+’ in operand of ‘&’ [-Wparentheses]
#define BUFFER_WRITE_32(segment, accessAddress, startAddress, mask, value) (segment[accessAddress - startAddress & mask] = value >> 24, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 1 & mask] = (value >> 16) & 0xFF, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 2 & mask] = (value >> 8) & 0xFF, segment[accessAddress - startAddress + 3 & mask] = value & 0xFF)
../src/hardwareRegistersAccessors.c.h:19:75: note: in expansion of macro ‘BUFFER_WRITE_32’
static inline void registerArrayWrite32(uint32_t address, uint32_t value){BUFFER_WRITE_32(palmReg, address, 0, 0xFFF, value);}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../src/hardwareRegisters.c: In function ‘printUnknownHwAccess’:
../src/hardwareRegisters.c:311:119: warning: suggest braces around empty body in an ‘else’ statement [-Wempty-body]
debugLog("CPU read %d bits from register 0x%03X, PC 0x%08X.\n", size, address, m68k_get_reg(NULL, M68K_REG_PPC));
^
cc -I./libretro-common/include -O2 -DNDEBUG -DGIT_VERSION=\"" f4873e0"\" -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-uninitialized -fPIC -c -o../src/sed1376.o ../src/sed1376.c
../src/sed1376.c: In function ‘sed1376GetRegister’:
../src/sed1376.c:113:109: warning: suggest braces around empty body in an ‘if’ statement [-Wempty-body]
debugLog("SED1376 register read from 0x%02X, PC 0x%08X.\n", address, m68k_get_reg(NULL, M68K_REG_PPC));
^
../src/sed1376.c: In function ‘sed1376SetRegister’:
../src/sed1376.c:153:122: warning: suggest braces around empty body in an ‘if’ statement [-Wempty-body]
debugLog("SED1376 register write 0x%02X to 0x%02X, PC 0x%08X.\n", value, address, m68k_get_reg(NULL, M68K_REG_PPC));
^
cc -I./libretro-common/include -O2 -DNDEBUG -DGIT_VERSION=\"" f4873e0"\" -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-uninitialized -fPIC -c -o../src/ads7846.o ../src/ads7846.c
../src/ads7846.c: In function ‘ads7846ExchangeBit’:
../src/ads7846.c:48:12: warning: unused variable ‘differentialMode’ [-Wunused-variable]
bool differentialMode = !(ads7846ControlByte & 0x04);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc -I./libretro-common/include -O2 -DNDEBUG -DGIT_VERSION=\"" f4873e0"\" -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-uninitialized -fPIC -c -o../src/sdcard.o ../src/sdcard.c
../src/sdcard.c: In function ‘sdCardLoadState’:
../src/sdcard.c:150:18: warning: variable ‘output’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
struct mem output;
^~~~~~
../src/sdcard.c:149:18: warning: variable ‘input’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
struct mem input;
^~~~~
../src/sdcard.c:148:18: warning: variable ‘patch’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
struct mem patch;
^~~~~
cc -I./libretro-common/include -O2 -DNDEBUG -DGIT_VERSION=\"" f4873e0"\" -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-uninitialized -fPIC -c -o../src/silkscreen.o ../src/silkscreen.c
cc -I./libretro-common/include -O2 -DNDEBUG -DGIT_VERSION=\"" f4873e0"\" -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-uninitialized -fPIC -c -o../src/68328Functions.o ../src/68328Functions.c
make: *** No rule to make target '../src/trapNumToName.o', needed by 'mu_libretro.so'. Stop.
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
Two separate issues caused Qt studio to not be able to build:
mainwindow.cpp#274
seems it should be qlonglong
instead of uint64_t
mainwindow.qrc
should reference images/todo.png
instead of images/toDo.png
due to Linux case sensitivityAfter I changed both of those, I was able to build just fine.
System info:
Ubuntu MATE x64 18.04
Qt Creator 4.7.0
Based on Qt 5.11.1 (GCC 5.3.1 20160406 (Red Hat 5.3.1-6), 64 bit)
Built on Jul 17 2018 04:23:40
From revision dedbb40f57
It might be helpful to add the build steps for those people who don't want to install Qt-Creator in order to build from master. I'm not exactly proficient at this stuff, but I believe the steps are just:
cd qtBuildSystem/Mu
qmake
make
Addendum:
Might also be worthwhile to say the minimum Qt version that can build this project (or add code to support slightly older versions). e.g. qtstring.back()
is only available in the most recent version. Before then, it's something like (size() - 1)
or something. I only mention this because Ubuntu's newest officially supported version of Qt is 5.9.5, not 5.11.1.
When compiling for Retroarch on Debian Bullseye, I get the following error:
** BUILDING mu_libretro.so FOR PLATFORM unix ** cc -fPIC -shared -Wl,--version-script=build/link.T -I./libretro-common/include -o mu_libretro.so ./libretro.o ./cursors.o ./../src/emulator.o ./../src/m5XXBus.o ./../src/dbvz.o ./../src/flx68000.o ./../src/sed1376.o ./../src/ads7846.o ./../src/pdiUsbD12.o ./../src/sdCard.o ./../src/silkscreen.o ./../src/audio/blip_buf.o ./../src/m68k/m68kops.o ./../src/m68k/m68kopnz.o ./../src/m68k/m68kopdm.o ./../src/m68k/m68kopac.o ./../src/m68k/m68kcpu.o ./../src/fileLauncher/launcher.o ./../src/pxa260/pxa260_DMA.o ./../src/pxa260/pxa260_DSP.o ./../src/pxa260/pxa260_GPIO.o ./../src/pxa260/pxa260_IC.o ./../src/pxa260/pxa260_LCD.o ./../src/pxa260/pxa260_PwrClk.o ./../src/pxa260/pxa260_RTC.o ./../src/pxa260/pxa260_TIMR.o ./../src/pxa260/pxa260_UART.o ./../src/pxa260/pxa260I2c.o ./../src/pxa260/pxa260Memctrl.o ./../src/pxa260/pxa260Timing.o ./../src/pxa260/pxa260Ssp.o ./../src/pxa260/pxa260Udc.o ./../src/pxa260/pxa260.o ./../src/armv5te/emuVarPool.o ./../src/armv5te/mem.o ./../src/armv5te/mmu.o ./../src/tps65010.o ./../src/tsc2101.o ./../src/w86l488.o ./../src/armv5te/os/os-linux.o ./../src/armv5te/asmcode.o ./libretro-common/compat/compat_strl.o ./libretro-common/compat/compat_posix_string.o ./libretro-common/compat/fopen_utf8.o ./libretro-common/encodings/encoding_utf.o ./libretro-common/memmap/memmap.o ./libretro-common/streams/file_stream.o ./libretro-common/string/stdstring.o ./libretro-common/vfs/vfs_implementation.o ./../src/armv5te/arm_interpreter.o ./../src/armv5te/thumb_interpreter.o ./../src/armv5te/cpu.o ./../src/armv5te/coproc.o -lm /usr/bin/ld: ./../src/pxa260/pxa260.o:(.bss+0x128): multiple definition of
pxa260Framebuffer'; ./../src/pxa260/pxa260_LCD.o:(.bss+0x0): first defined here
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
`
In 037cca5 the name of sdcard.h
and sdcard.c
got changed to sdCard.h
and sdCard.c
respectively, but the file names were not updated accordingly. This causes issues when building on linux.
Due to the passing of Emily, the new location of Mu is located at https://github.com/libretro/Mu.
Hey guys,
So I've compiled Mu with QT interface on macOS.
The system is running fine.
Now I need to install PRC file to see how it works.
As I understand all I should do is click this button:
Then select a PRC file and it's done, or am I missing something?
I do not see this app in the apps menu after this process. Actually nothing is happening after that...
I'm new into PalmOS, I just need it to check how the app works.
PRC file:
mmcd-1.5d.zip
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
A PHP framework for web artisans
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
Data-Driven Documents codes.
China tencent open source team.