Empty dictionary declaration about swiftinflux HOT 8 CLOSED

SwiftInFlux is not a list of bugs in Swift.

from swiftinflux.

That shows a change on the compiler/IDE not a bug.

from swiftinflux.

I don't think I understand.

from swiftinflux.

I had that line compiling in XCode 6.1 but it marks as an error in XCode 6.3 beta
Expected experssion for size of array type

and if you add some parentesis it compile:
let newUserInfo = (error.userInfo as? [NSObject:NSObject]) ?? [:]

Still not the objective of SwiftInFlux?

from swiftinflux.

Ultimately, no.

This seems like a regression in a compiler, and I believe you should definitely file a radar about that, but that doesn't look like a deliberate change in the language semantics to me.

from swiftinflux.

Hm. It looks like the as? operator has changed its precedence (it's now lower than ??) — I checked and ?? has the same precedence as before.

I dunno, it is a change, but I would never make the assumption that error.userInfo as? [NSObject: NSObject] ?? [:] did what you expected to. I'd put it in parens anyway.

@jklausa? @ksm?

from swiftinflux.

Oh, snap, right, the precedence did change. Totally forgot about it! I'm not so sure myself now.

from swiftinflux.

Turns out, it is a bug :)

https://devforums.apple.com/message/1102772#1102772

Should be fixed in the next beta.

from swiftinflux.