Music auto-tagger using keras
- IF YOU WANT A TAGGER, please also look at
- IF YOU WANT A FEATURE EXTRACTOR, lookg at either
..because MusicTaggerCNN and MusicTaggerCRNN is based on an old (and a bit incorrect) implementation of Batch Normalization of old Keras (thanks god it worked anyway), it's quite tricky to fix.
- use keras == 1.0.6 for
MusicTaggerCNN. - use 1.2 >= keras > 1.0.6 for
MusicTaggerCRNN. - use 1.2 >= keras >= 1.1 for
compact_cnn.
- You need
kerasto runexample.py.- To use your own audio file, you need
librosa.
- To use your own audio file, you need
- The input data shape is
(None, channel, height, width), i.e. following theano convention. If you're using tensorflow as your backend, you should check out~/.keras/keras.jsonifimage_dim_orderingis set toth, i.e.
"image_dim_ordering": "th",- To use
compact_cnn, You need to install Kapre.
For MusicTaggerCNN and MusicTaggerCRNN.
- example_tagging.py: tagging example, example_feat_extract.py: feature extraction example
- music_tagger_cnn.py, music_tagger_crnn.py: Models
For compact_cnn
Left: compact_cnn CNN, music_tager_cnn. Right: music_tagger_crnn
- 5-layer 2D Convolutions
- num_parameter: 865,950
- AUC score of 0.8654
- WARNING with keras >1.0.6, this model does not work properly. Please use MusicTaggerCRNN until it is updated! (FYI: with 3M parameter, a deeper ConvNet showed 0.8595 AUC.)
- 4-layer 2D Convolutions + 2 GRU
- num_parameter: 396,786
- AUC score: 0.8662
- Using 29.1s music files in Million Song Dataset
- split setting: A repo for split setting for an identical setting.
- See papers
- The tags are...
['rock', 'pop', 'alternative', 'indie', 'electronic', 'female vocalists',
'dance', '00s', 'alternative rock', 'jazz', 'beautiful', 'metal',
'chillout', 'male vocalists', 'classic rock', 'soul', 'indie rock',
'Mellow', 'electronica', '80s', 'folk', '90s', 'chill', 'instrumental',
'punk', 'oldies', 'blues', 'hard rock', 'ambient', 'acoustic', 'experimental',
'female vocalist', 'guitar', 'Hip-Hop', '70s', 'party', 'country', 'easy listening',
'sexy', 'catchy', 'funk', 'electro' ,'heavy metal', 'Progressive rock',
'60s', 'rnb', 'indie pop', 'sad', 'House', 'happy']- UPDATE: The most efficient computation, use
compact_cnn. Otherwise read below. - Training:
MusicTaggerCNNis faster thanMusicTaggerCRNN(wall-clock time) - Prediction: They are more or less the same.
- Memory Usage:
MusicTaggerCRNNhave smaller number of trainable parameters. Actually you can even decreases the number of feature maps. TheMusicTaggerCRNNstill works quite well in the case - i.e., the current setting is a little bit rich (or redundant). WithMusicTaggerCNN, you will see the performance decrease if you reduce down the parameters.
Therefore, if you just wanna use the pre-trained weights, use MusicTaggerCNN. If you wanna train by yourself, it's up to you. I would use MusicTaggerCRNN after downsizing it to, like, 0.2M parameters (then the training time would be similar to MusicTaggerCNN) in general. To reduce the size, change number of feature maps of convolution layers.
By setting include_top=False, you can get 256-dim (MusicTaggerCNN) or 32-dim (MusicTaggerCRNN) feature representation.
In general, I would recommend to use MusicTaggerCRNN and 32-dim feature as for predicting 50 tags, 256 features actually sound bit too large. I haven't looked into 256-dim feature but only 32-dim features. I thought of using PCA to reduce the dimension more, but ended up not applying it because mean(abs(recovered - original) / original) are .12 (dim: 32->16), .05 (dim: 32->24) - which don't seem good enough.
Probably the 256-dim features are redundant (which then you can reduce them down effectively with PCA), or they just include more information than 32-dim ones (e.g., features in different hierarchical levels). If the dimension size would not matter, it's worth choosing 256-dim ones.
$ python example_tagging.py
$ python example_feat_extract.pytheano, MusicTaggerCRNN
data/bensound-cute.mp3
[('jazz', '0.444'), ('instrumental', '0.151'), ('folk', '0.103'), ('Hip-Hop', '0.103'), ('ambient', '0.077')]
[('guitar', '0.068'), ('rock', '0.058'), ('acoustic', '0.054'), ('experimental', '0.051'), ('electronic', '0.042')]
data/bensound-actionable.mp3
[('jazz', '0.416'), ('instrumental', '0.181'), ('Hip-Hop', '0.085'), ('folk', '0.085'), ('rock', '0.081')]
[('ambient', '0.068'), ('guitar', '0.062'), ('Progressive rock', '0.048'), ('experimental', '0.046'), ('acoustic', '0.046')]
data/bensound-dubstep.mp3
[('Hip-Hop', '0.245'), ('rock', '0.183'), ('alternative', '0.081'), ('electronic', '0.076'), ('alternative rock', '0.053')]
[('metal', '0.051'), ('indie', '0.028'), ('instrumental', '0.027'), ('electronica', '0.024'), ('hard rock', '0.023')]
data/bensound-thejazzpiano.mp3
[('jazz', '0.299'), ('instrumental', '0.174'), ('electronic', '0.089'), ('ambient', '0.061'), ('chillout', '0.052')]
[('rock', '0.044'), ('guitar', '0.044'), ('funk', '0.033'), ('chill', '0.032'), ('Progressive rock', '0.029')]- More info - CNN:
- on this paper, or blog post.
- Also please take a look on the slide at ismir 2016. It includes some results that are not in the paper.
- More info - RNN:
- A repo for split setting for an identical setting of experiments in two papers.
- Audio file: find someone around you who happened to have the preview clips. or you have to crawl the files. I would recommend you to crawl your colleagues...
-
Compact CNN: will be updated.
-
Convnet: Automatic Tagging using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks, Keunwoo Choi, George Fazekas, Mark Sandler 17th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, New York, USA, 2016
-
ConvRNN : Convolutional Recurrent Neural Networks for Music Classification, Keunwoo Choi, George Fazekas, Mark Sandler, Kyunghyun Cho, arXiv:1609.04243, 2016
-
Test music items are from http://www.bensound.com.
React
Typescript
Django
Laravel
Facebook
Microsoft
Google
Alibaba
D3
Tencent