justgnohug / ped Goto Github PK

By executing this command,

It is slightly difficult to find out what the current list filter is in place or was executed. Hence if I want to go up a level or recall what other filters I want to apply to list, I would have to do "list" and restart the process.

There was clear documentation of this feature however, it may be a good idea to indicate what filters have been applied for "list".

PS: Perhaps consider moving the note on "list", that other commands like "find" will only apply to that particular "list", into a more prominent section.

e.g:

As Seen in this portion of UG,

Following the logic from my previous Issue, I seperated the command, but it seems like the command is not working as expected.

Chaining the commands did not work as well.

However, following along with the command result, i figured out I may be missing a "l/" flag.

Tried it and it worked.

When trying to add a large quantity to an item, an error message of maximum value exceeded.

There is no mention of maximum quantity.

Having applied the "sort quantity asc" and adding an item of quantity "001", the value 001 is accepted and represented as such. (*See item at index 8)

For us, we understand that 001 may be smaller than 2, however, it is considered a higher value than an item of qty 10.

(EDIT!!!!!!!)
Reapplying the filter, the "asc" and "desc", it recognizes the value as 1. However the value still shows as "001"

Following this section of the UG,

In the examples, I found "followed by" ambiguous. I thought it was possible to chain the commands as such:

but only the "find" command was executed. And no status message on whether the second command was parsed or not.

I do believe this is a minor documentation bug, however it was ambiguious enough for me to give it a try.

Fortunately, no bugs occurred which was great, but also hinted that the "delete" command was probably just not parsed.

According to UG as seen below, upon adding a similar item, I am expecting a warning.

However, as seen in the image below, no warning is shown.

This is my understanding. Do reject it if it does not tally. Thank you.

After editing "Item 6" 's expiry date to Sep 17 2021, and editing "Item 7" 's expiry date to expired,

"sort expirydate" does nothing. Not sure if I understood the command corerctly. I was expecting it to sort the Sep17 expiry date to the top.

Changing "Item 1" 's expiry date too, and retried executing it. Did not work.