Confusing documentation regarding Independent multi-time series forecasting and exogenous features about skforecast HOT 7 CLOSED

Hi @valentin-fngr,
Thanks for using skforecast.
You are right, the graph represents the transformation applied internally by the forecaster.
The current implementation does not allow to use a different exogenous variable for each time series, they are considered as global for all of them.

We will try to improve the documentation in the next release for better clarity.

from skforecast.

So, I cam with a work around which is not exactly what I want but it somehow yields interesting results so I might as well share it.

I create pivot tables for both the targets and the features. This is in the case of a multi-series approach :

# features 
_df_features = _df.pivot_table(index='timestamp', columns='hub', values=[col for col in _df.columns[:140] )
_df_features.columns = [f'{col[0]}_{col[1]}' for col in _df_features.columns]
_df_features = _df.sort_index()
_df_features = _df.asfreq('H')


# targets 
_df_series = pd.pivot_table(
        data=_df, 
        values="y", 
        index="timestamp", 
        columns=["hub"]
    )

  _df_series.columns.name = None
  _df_series.columns = [f"hub_{col}" for col in _df_series.columns]
  _df_series = _df_series.sort_index()
  _df_series = _df_series.asfreq('H')

train_end = "2022-03-31 11:00:00" 

results = grid_search_forecaster_multiseries(
              forecaster         = forecaster,
              series             = _df,
              exog               = _df_features,
              levels             = None,
              lags_grid          = lags_grid,
              param_grid         = param_grid,
              steps              = 24,
              gap                = 12,
              metric             = [mean_absolute_error, mean_squared_error],
              initial_train_size = len(_df.loc[:train_end]),
              refit              = True,
              fixed_train_size   = True,
              return_best        = False,
              n_jobs             = 'auto',
              verbose            = False,
              show_progress      = True
          )
    
    return results

So basically this allows me to stack, for each timestamp, all features for each time series.
This is the best I can do, which is not too bad. But, you can imagine that if I have 800 features for 10 time series, it gives me 8000 exogenous features, which, surprisingly helps my Ridge model ahah.

from skforecast.

After reading the source code, I figured that the drawing is representing what is happening under the hood.
Nonetheless, I believe this is confusing and does not help on how to prepare the data in the case of multi_series + exogenous features.

I still do not know how to prepare my data in that case.

from skforecast.

Hello @valentin-fngr

Thanks for opening the issue. If I understand you correctly, your problem is that you want to add a different exogenous variable per series. Could you give us some information about your use case? We have this feature in the backlog, but the only use case that comes to my mind that needs this is for example modeling a time series by countries and you need a different vacation indicator for each of them.

As for the documentation, yes, you are right, this is what happens under the hood. Please see the updated user guide at the following link, where I have added a new section on exogenous variables:

https://skforecast.org/latest/user_guides/independent-multi-time-series-forecasting

It is important to know that the dataframe that ForecasterAutoregMultiSeries expects looks like this:

One column for each target variable (item_1, item_2 and item_3) and additionals with the exogenous variables.

Please, let us know your thoughts on this 😄

from skforecast.

Hi @JavierEscobarOrtiz,

Thanks for your reply.
Here is my use case :

I have 10 different stocks (my time series). All of them have the same 100 features X1 to X100 but with different values.
for example :

Here, HUB is the time serie id. imagine you have different values for hub.

I thought about implementing the feature and submitting a pull request, I started, but time was ticking and I could not propose a clean pull request with all associated tests.

Regarding your modification, I think it is much better and clears any confusion. I would really suggest to build that feature as a lot of people might benefit from it.

Valentin

from skforecast.

Do you have any workaround regarding my specific problem ?
I would like to keep using your library for its simplicity.

from skforecast.

Hi @valentin-fngr,
Unfortunately, we do not currently have a solution for incorporating different exogenous variables for each series in the multi-series forecasting models. However, this feature is currently on our radar and is part of our backlog for upcoming feature releases.

We are always open to new ideas. If you have any suggestions, we would be happy to discuss them with you.

from skforecast.