Bro, how to even friggin display a friggin boolen, friggityfruggfrogg, man? about open-stage-control HOT 3 CLOSED

Yeah, I know it wasn't the best way to ask for help, but the documentation confused me. Like "preArgs" is something used extensively, but is not really explained in the documentation, which is usually where I look first. And I also know it's withour warranty and spare time and all that, but there's also the aspect of "why do it then?". This software can create complex control surfaces for OSC devices and the like, has a server and a client and even a web frontend that makes it universal for any device that can use webpages. ...but a simple on off indicator for a value requires special steps? When a LED is also part of the widgets? To me, LEDs are THE binary on off indicator, but this one is gradual. Which is fine because it's easier to emulate dimming that way than by flickering it off and on very quickly. But *still*, true/false should be the core lifeblood of an LED. And it's my time too. Of course you don't know what the motivation behind my actions are, regarding openstagecontrol, so ...I can't *really* say anything, but it's for the convenience of myself _and_ others. Since it's for a popular open source synth (zynaddsubfx) So yeah, it's your spare time, all that jazz, but you did it, and you made it available, it's somewhat natural to then get people who are interested in it, and those who want to use it. And that is where the ensnaring begins. "Ooo, cool thing... let's see how it's used. Oh..uhh...what? Why ...is it this way? Whuh? How? So many features, such complex showcased user contributions...so am *I* stupid for not getting it? While others do? Why do I not understand preArgs? Let me google it... Huh? THere are virtually no explanations, but people aren't complaining. So I guess they're using it just fine? What? I just want a glowy lamp to show if this thing is active. There's whole youtube series where people emulate old hardware with it, but noone says anything? Is this reality? Am I in a simulation? Am I having a stroke? Am I crazy? Is this a prank?" Et cetera. Maybe I should go into the habit and ignore open source documentations and always go directly to forums and the like and ask there. I did this as a feature request because I really do want this as a request. A request for a friggin on off indicator. Or at the very least, a better bit of documentation that one can use to arrrive at the same result. After all, why make a software ...if using it...is not that easy, ESPECIALLY after reading the docs. Just like you expected a better conduct of me... to the extent where you mocked me right back "how to not get help". I expected a better documentation. So you clearly have a sense of disappointment... and thus hopefully can understand my plight. You did nothing wrong expecting me to be less flippant and abrasive. I did nothing wrong expecting an actual explanation in the documentation. Why write a comment if it's not proper? If its not proper then people don't want to read it, or do anything with it. Why write a program if it's not explained? If it's not explained, then people will have problems, too. That it's hard work, I can imagine...but that's also secondary. If I had to carry a 50 kilogram sack of concrete for a kilometer each time to type a single letter in my opening comment, which you did not like. Then you would not care much if it was hard work to write it. You would still rather prefer it to be a less abrasive one. Would you not?