Giter Club home page Giter Club logo

cppq's People

Contributors

jafarlihi avatar

Stargazers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

Watchers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

cppq's Issues

Request: Separation of JSON library

Your library looks neat. One downside I see is that it directly uses nlohmann::json. It would be nice if nlohmann::json was an optional dependency and if the main library just worked on std::string. This would allow various JSON libraries to be used or even other formats for messages.

You could require a cppq::transform struct, which you could define in another header. That would allow nlohmann::json to be entirely optional and another implementation could be added instead.

Something like:

struct transform
{
   template <class T>
   std::string operator()(T& payload) {
      nlohmann::json j = payload;
      return j.dump();
   }
};

You could then still have the exact same code:

cppq::Task NewEmailDeliveryTask(EmailDeliveryPayload payload) {
  nlohmann::json j = payload;
  return cppq::Task{TypeEmailDelivery, j, 10};
}

cppq::Task here would just call transform on the second argument.

transform could be a function, but a struct is probably the better long term approach for more flexibility.
You can just predeclare struct transform; in cppq.hpp so that the sequence of including headers doesn't matter.

You could automate receiving the message, but I think it would be simpler, cleaner, and more flexible to have the user parse the std::string returned to the client. It's not hard to call nlohmann::json::parse(task.payload);
This also gives the user control over how the message is parsed and when it is parsed.

Thanks for your work on this!

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    ๐Ÿ–– Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. ๐Ÿ“Š๐Ÿ“ˆ๐ŸŽ‰

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google โค๏ธ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.