Currently it doesn't look very good, by any definition of good. Some quick work on it should make it at least acceptable.

Currently looks like this:

Thanks to @CCoupris we have a new, awesome design for the landing page in the works \o/

In tandem with this, it would be nice to have a page dedicated just to the people who helped make Instant Website what it is.

This page could be linked in the footer, probably next to the "About" page, or maybe as a section on the About page, unsure.

Here we can list (optionally, depending on what people want):

• Name
• What they contributed
• Any links they want attached
• Maybe a profile picture

The landing page doesn't mention anything about the design process we're trying to implement. Would be nice to have a specific page for it somewhere, but we might want to wait until we have more details about it.

Current design on the landing page and inside the dashboard is vastly different, mostly because the Dashboard was built as-needed without any upfront design while the landing page was built almost exactly the opposite way.

Would be great, once a general theme and design have been nailed down, to unify them to look more alike.

Current illustrations on the landing page are illustrations that have been picked and licensed from Adobe Stock.

Would be much nicer if we had a set of custom illustrations that not only fit better with the landing page, but are also copyleft/open for others to reuse/remix as needed.

Making illustrations from scratch is way above my skill level though, hence licensing illustrations from Adobe Stock was done instead.

Would be great to have more thoughts and feedback from people around what open / open sources / copyleft design actually mean to them, so we can make sure the process is open and inclusive enough for others to want to contribute.

The current logo was made by me in haste, and I'm sure we can come up with something better :) Happy to hear any suggestions or see different versions of it.

Current version is here:

https://www.figma.com/file/ARy67X7zcUXwOuUywMhQBa/Landing-Page?node-id=30%3A810

Current plugin is lacking a lot of features that would make the UX a lot better.

• Select which website in Instant Website to be connected to (dropdown with a list of websites)
• Login without copy/paste tokens (a button for triggering the login + show current logged in user)
• Select which account we're authenticated with (dropdown with list of currently logged in users)
• Properties panel for adding attributes to elements (we want to be able to add videos via URLs for example), should be able to be easily extended in the future as we add more attributes
• General settings for the current website (like starting page, description and so on), also easily extendable
• Loading states for when you change connected account/website and we need to reload resources from Instant Website

Existing features that should also be in V2:

• Create/update the website
• Link to Dashboard and Instant Website landing page

The design of the plugin should follow the general design of Figma so it looks familiar to the users. See UI2: Figma's Design System and Figma Plugin DS UI Library. Another community file with some reusable elements: https://www.figma.com/community/file/783443376634935772

The current colors are a bit all over the place. Would be good to run through them again and adjust to make sure they fit properly.

In order to show what Instant Website can be used for, it'd be great to have bunch of example websites created with Instant Website.

I've created a couple of issues that can all be worked on independently, and once they are created we can link them from the Instant Website website.

The basic idea here is that we create independent websites for each one of these that showcase how Instant Website can be used. So for the documentation use case, we create an example website that could act as a base documentation website.

Current issues:

• Landing Page #11
• Documentation #12
• Portfolio #13
• Data Visualization #14
• Story #15

Currently using the GitHub issues here, but that might not be the best way of managing this.

Secondly, we can take a look at Notion. Unsure how their pricing would work for us (think we have to pay per user, which is not gonna work for a truly open and inclusive process), but need to take a deeper look.

The tool needs to at least support (ad-hoc or natively):

• Creating/closing tasks that should be done
• Assigning people to tasks
• Facilitate discussions around specific tasks
• Ideally have a way of setting up dependencies between tasks