Giter Club home page Giter Club logo

google-api-python-client-stubs's Introduction

Type stubs for google-api-python-client

PyPI version

This package provides type stubs for the google-api-python-client library. It allows you to type check usage of the library with e.g. mypy and will also improve autocomplete in many editors.

This is in no way affiliated with Google.

The stubs were generated automatically based on Google's Discovery Documents, that are bundled with google-api-python-client as of v2.

If you find incorrect annotations, please create an issue.

Releases can be somewhat infrequent. If you need a new release, create an issue and I'll probably get around to it faster.

Installation

$ pip install google-api-python-client-stubs

The stubs should be automatically picked up by your editor or typechecker.

Caveats

Explicit annotations

The google-api-python-client-stubs is quite dynamic. All resources are just instances of a single class with dynamically attached methods and the requests and responses are just dictionaries. The way this is annotated is with classes and TypedDicts that don't exist in the actual library, only in the stub files. This means you cannot use any of these types at runtime, it will cause your code to crash. If you rely solely on type inference, this is not an issue, but as soon as you want to explicitly annotate a variable, argument or return type in your code with one of these types, you must follow these rules:

  1. Either put from __future__ import annotations at the top of your file or surround the annotations with quotes. This ensures that Python doesn't attempt to evaluate the types at runtime. Note that the import is only supported in Python 3.7 and above.
  2. Only import the types inside an if typing.TYPE_CHECKING block. This ensures that the imports are only evaluated during type checking, not at runtime.

Any type not available at runtime is located under the googleapiclient._apis package, with a subpackage for the API and a subpackage for the API version. For example, the return type of build("sheets", "v4"), SheetsResource, should be imported from googleapiclient._apis.sheets.v4. Nested resources have a nested class structure, e.g. the return type of build("sheets", "v4").spreadsheets().values() is SheetsResource.SpreadsheetsResource.ValuesResource. If autocompleting import paths doesn't work you can find the correct path by using Mypy's reveal_type on the thing you want to explicitly annotate. For TypedDicts this will also give you useful info about the structure of the dictionary.

If you use Pyright/Pylance, you'll get a reportMissingModuleSource error at the import site, which indicates that the stub file doesn't have a corresponding source file. As long as the import only occurs during typechecking, this can be safely ignored. Autocomplete and typechecking will still work.

Note that since the types don't exist at runtime, they're not compatible with libraries that evaluate annotations at runtime. For example, you can't use them to annotate a field in a Pydantic model.

Performance

The stubs contain a separate overload of googleapiclient.discovery.build for each service and version (see discovery.pyi). This can lead to slow type inference for this function. Mypy will generally be pretty fast after the first run, but you might experience slow autocomplete in your editor. If you're experiencing this problem you can bypass type inference with explicit annotations, e.g. sheets_service: SheetsResource = build("sheets", "v4") instead of sheets_service = build("sheets", "v4"). Note the caveats to this approach in the previous section.

Recursive types

The stubs previously didn't include recursive type definitions due to a lack of type checker support, but this is now included. Note that if you're using Mypy, v0.990 or higher is required for this to work.

Stubs for non-API-specific parts

There are detailed stubs for the API services, but other parts of the library have only been annotated with stubgen, so they're mostly typed as Any. I believe these parts are mostly used internally by the library itself, so for most users this should be fine. Contributions to improve these stubs are welcome, though.

google-api-python-client-stubs's People

Contributors

ccope avatar henribru avatar

Stargazers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

Watchers

 avatar  avatar  avatar

google-api-python-client-stubs's Issues

Missing support for HttpMock?

Hi, thanks for the work on this library!

The google-api-python-client library makes available the HttpMock class for testing purposes (see https://github.com/googleapis/google-api-python-client/blob/master/docs/mocks.md#example)

I don't believe this is compatible with the signature defined at https://github.com/henribru/google-api-python-client-stubs/blob/master/googleapiclient-stubs/discovery.pyi#L346.

Would an | operator on the types be the change we want here or would you recommend doing something like:

http = Http(HttpMock("test_response.json", {"status": "200"}))

Consider moving the nested resources

Currently nested resources are defined as nested classes. This is kinda convenient because it means you only need to import the base resource, e.g. you can do from googleapiclient._apis.analytics.v3.resources import AnalyticsResource and then you can get the nested management resource as AnalyticsResource.ManagementResource. It also mirrors how you get that nested resource in your code, i.e. management_resource = analytics_resource.management(). The main issue with this is that it ends up polluting the autocomplete on the resources. For an example, notice how both management and ManagementResource show up here:

image

The question is if it could it be worth restructuring this in some way to avoid this issue

Update for 2.64?

My understanding is that these types are auto-generator, can you perform an update and/or publish the generator so this can be done automatically?

Stubs for testing?

Could this library be extended to provide stubbing for tests?
I have recently started developing against GCP in python and I really miss the AWS SDK test stubs for Ruby.
If this feels like a good fit, I would be interested in collaborating.

How can I get this to work?

Sorry if I ask, and if I am is because I value this package so good job on that.

But really, what should I do in order to make this work? The documentation doesn't seem to explain much besides installing the package (which I did obviously).

I am using poetry and installed both googleapiclient and this package using poetry add. At first I tried installing the stubs in the DEV group, then I also tried in the main group while trying many thing to try and get this working.

So, I'm trying to use Google Calendar API, right?
Basically, if I don't import from googleapiclient._apis.calendar.v3.resources, I cannot use CalendarResource because it's undefined, but that import doesn't work! I feel like I'm missing something really simple here, please help. Thank you very much

image
image
image
image

Which version for google-api-python-client v1.12.11 ?

Hi,
First, thanks for maintaining this library.
I'm using google-api-python-client v1.12.11 in tandem with Airflow 2.6.1's constraints file.

I'm trying to install google-api-python-client-stubs to match, but not finding any version that pip is happy with.

If I try google-api-python-client-stubs==1.12.0 I get,

google-api-python-client-stubs 1.12.0 depends on google-api-python-client<3.0.0 and >=2.64.0
The user requested (constraint) google-api-python-client==1.12.11

and if I just specify ``google-api-python-client-stubsinrequirements.txt` and let pip try to figure it out, it tries all the available releases and ends with,

ERROR: ResolutionImpossible: for help visit https://pip.pypa.io/en/latest/topics/dependency-resolution/#dealing-with-dependency-conflicts

Please advise.
Thank you!

_media methods are missing from stubs

Docstrings

The methods that google-api-python-client generates at runtime actually has docstrings. It would be useful to add these in the stubs so that they're shown in your IDE

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    ๐Ÿ–– Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. ๐Ÿ“Š๐Ÿ“ˆ๐ŸŽ‰

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google โค๏ธ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.