hahacen / cse15l-lab-reports Goto Github PK

Here is your feedback for Lab Report 3:

• Correct markdown formatting.
• Lab report is on its own page, not the index page.
• Correct screenshot of .ssh/config file
• Show the ssh command logging you into your account using just the alias you chose.
• Show an scp command copying a file to your account using just the alias you chose.
• Correct description of streamlining ssh configuration.
• Screenshot of where the public key you made is stored on Github and in your user account.
• Screenshot of where the private key you made is stored on your user account.
• Show git commands to commit/push a change while logged into your ieng6 account.
• Show a link for the resulting commit.
• Correct description of setting up Github access from ieng6.
• Show copying your whole markdown-parse directory to your ieng6 account.
• Show logging into your ieng6 account and compiling/running the tests for your repository.
• Show combining scp, semicolon, and ssh to copy the whole directory and run the tests in one line.
• Correct description of copying whole directories.

Additional comments from your grader:
-Please include the git push command as well as the link to the commit
-Include some annotations describing what each screenshot shows in the last task (also it might make the screenshots a bit cleaner to use the -q option tag)
-Show the tests running successfully in one line

Great work!

If you don't have all the checkmarks above, fix the issues described, and then submit a regrade request on Gradescope. Use this template for your regrade request:

• Link to this issue
• Link to your published lab report page

Here is your feedback for Lab Report 5:

• Provides correct description of how mismatch in outputs was identified
• Correct markdown formatting. see first comment
• Lab report is on its own page, not the index page.

Test File 1

• Describes which implementation is correct
• Shows actual output and the expected output
• Provides correct description of the bug
• Provides code snippet that needs to be changed

Test File 2

• Describes which implementation is correct
• Shows actual output and the expected output
• Provides correct description of the bug
• Provides code snippet that needs to be changed

Additional comments from your grader:

Ensure that you provide the links to both of the test files that you chose to use. Please read the lab write-up carefully! You should be analyzing the outputs for both test files.

Feel free to comment below with any questions about the rubric/feedback

---

If you don't have all the checkmarks above, fix the issues described, and then submit a regrade request on Gradescope. Use this template for your regrade request:

Link to this issue
Link to your published lab report page

Here is your feedback for Lab Report 4:
 

• Provides link to their markdown-parse repository
• Provides link to the markdown-parse repository they reviewed
   
  Snippet 1
• Shows the test(s) / expected output in MarkdownParseTest.java
  • close! expected output should be the link inside the parentheses and not the text inside the brackets. Also, because you seemed to have used to two different tests for Snippet 1 on your implementation and the other implementation, please include both tests.
• Shows the output of running test(s) for their implementation
• Shows the output of running for the implementation they reviewed
• Answers the code change question about their program
   
  Snippet 2
• Shows the test(s) / expected output in MarkdownParseTest.java
  • expected output should be the link inside the parentheses and not the text inside the brackets. Also, because you seemed to have used to two different tests for Snippet 2 on your implementation and the other implementation, please include both tests.
• Shows the output of running test(s) for their implementation
• Shows the output of running for the implementation they reviewed
• Answers the code change question about their program
   
  Snippet 3
• Shows the test(s) / expected output in MarkdownParseTest.java
  • expected output should be the link inside the parentheses and not the text inside the brackets. Also, because you seemed to have used to two different tests for Snippet 3 on your implementation and the other implementation, please include both tests.
• Shows the output of running test(s) for their implementation
• Shows the output of running for the implementation they reviewed
• Answers the code change question about their program

Additional comments from your grader:
Good job!
 
Feel free to comment below any questions about the rubric/feedback
 

 
If you don't have all the checkmarks above, fix the issues described, and then submit a regrade request on Gradescope. Use this template for your regrade request:
 

• Link to this issue
• Link to your published lab report page

Here is your feedback for Lab Report 2:

• Correct screenshot of code diff page
• Correct failure inducing test file - 1
• Correct failure inducing test file - 2
• Correct failure inducing test file - 3
• Screenshot of symptom output that caused the failure for test file - 1
• Screenshot of symptom output that caused the failure for test file - 2
• Screenshot of symptom output that caused the failure for test file - 3
• Correct description for the relationship between the bug, the symptom, and the failure-inducing input for file - 1
• Correct description for the relationship between the bug, the symptom, and the failure-inducing input for file - 2
• Correct description for the relationship between the bug, the symptom, and the failure-inducing input for file - 3
  • try to explicitly name the bug and symptom in your description.
• Correct markdown formatting
  • try updating your test file links to be in markdown format
• Lab report is on its own page, not the index page
• Text is formatted in a way that was easy for grader to read

Additional comments from your grader:
Great job! Keep up the good work:)

---

If you don't have all the checkmarks above, fix the issues described, and then submit a regrade request on Gradescope. Use this template for your regrade request:

• Link to this issue
• Link to your published lab report page