Compile with -O2 by default about qb64 HOT 12 CLOSED

Just gunna throw my 2 cents in: Whatever flags that get passed to the compiler, ultimately they should be configurable (ideally from the IDE). There should definitely be a default set, and it should probably be for whatever makes the fastest executable. But there may be certain cases where you don't care about speed, but about size - so those optimizations should be possible. I could also see in the IDE being able to select "optimize for speed" and "optimize for size" and "custom flags" - or maybe a way to have multiple custom flag options that can be referenced by description (and in that case, the speed/size options could be such options in the list, but non-modifiable). Such a system would get complex quick; you'd probably want a way to copy the options to a new entry, a way to delete a defined config, and maybe a way to sort/rearrange the entries...

from qb64.

That would just speed up the main application wouldn't it? Maybe make the compiler a little bit faster?
I don't know about that making the actual executables produced any faster

from qb64.

qbx.cpp is in every program compiled with QB64, not just the IDE.

from qb64.

Well then what are the hold backs of doing this? And then why not do -Ofast or -O3 since those optimize even further?

from qb64.

Just gunna throw my 2 cents in: Whatever flags that get passed to the compiler, ultimately they should be configurable (ideally from the IDE). There should definitely be a default set, and it should probably be for whatever makes the fastest executable. But there may be certain cases where you don't care about speed, but about size - so those optimizations should be possible. I could also see in the IDE being able to select "optimize for speed" and "optimize for size" and "custom flags" - or maybe a way to have multiple custom flag options that can be referenced by description (and in that case, the speed/size options could be such options in the list, but non-modifiable). Such a system would get complex quick; you'd probably want a way to copy the options to a new entry, a way to delete a defined config, and maybe a way to sort/rearrange the entries...

Yes, can this be added in the IDE menu? It shouldn't be hard to implement at all since all it is doing is changing part of a string in a text file.
Maybe just have a model type menu for it in the 'Options' menu?

from qb64.

• Optimize for speed
• Optimize for size

from qb64.

[ ] run these commands on generated executable: [x] strip [x] upx...
strip as in: Discard symbols from object files.? run upx (Discard symbols from object files.) over it?

from qb64.

I'm pretty sure -s (Stripping) option is already enabled, but I'm not completely positive.

from qb64.

Unless you mean the strip program?

from qb64.

stripping with the compiler or stripping with the program is the same, afaik

from qb64.

stripping with the compiler or stripping with the program is the same, afaik

Sorry I was thinking of thinking of a different program that stripped a binary of unused functions (which I didn't realize was also another command line option in GCC -dead_strip)

from qb64.

Moved to https://github.com/QB64Team/qb64

from qb64.