Provide Namespace Route Collections about fosjsroutingbundle HOT 11 CLOSED

The admin and the public parts of your "site" should be two separate projects IMO

from fosjsroutingbundle.

I think that given symfony2's ability to have multiple firewalls (and that the docs no longer recommend having a frontend and backend controller), the request is something that should be considered (should a PR land)

from fosjsroutingbundle.

I too have dire need in this feature, exposing backend route structure for everybody is not very secure.
Also having used symfony2, i've tried different approaches for separating frontend and backend code, and using 2 separate projects for this - is not a viable option, as front and backend share tons of code. The most common practice is:

1. Having FrontBundle, CoreBundle for shared code and BackBundle for admin functionality.
2. http://stackoverflow.com/a/8016867/255408

It would be great to be able to have route collections for that reason, and i'm sure there are many other use-cases for that.

from fosjsroutingbundle.

+1 for this feature

from fosjsroutingbundle.

Hi,

I also think it is a useful feature, for projects with a single application, for security reasons (that's why I'm here !).

I added a few lines to the code to handle this.

This is a small description of what I done (which is not much) :

• I added a "--set" argument to commands
• If a set is specified, then in the routes extractor, I check the "expose_set" route option to check if they are the same, and add the route to exposed routes collection or not
• By default (the "default" set), all the routes with "expose_set" option set to "default" or without "expose_set" option are extracted

What do you think of the feature ?

Diff is at https://github.com/paxal/FOSJsRoutingBundle/compare/multiple-sets

from fosjsroutingbundle.

I think this feature is interesting. Could you open a PR with your change ? It will be easier to comment on it to provide review (I have some change to request about the way it is implemented)

from fosjsroutingbundle.

👍

from fosjsroutingbundle.

PR submitted with id #108

from fosjsroutingbundle.

+1

from fosjsroutingbundle.

How about a regex set definition? Don't you think it's a waste of time/error prone to have to remember and annotate each and every action?

from fosjsroutingbundle.

Discussion continues in #108

from fosjsroutingbundle.