Hi, will this great project be updated to support version 3.18 of the API? Seems like not much needs to be fixed, only the clicks do not work currently

HI Admin,

This is phani.I spoke with you in esri dev summit asking for the support of this cluster layer for 4.X esri javascript.Can you please let me know when you will upload the new version of cluster layer which supports 4.x version.

Thanks in advance.

Hello everyone

I would like to know if have anyone already implemented this cluster layer on dijit framework (I.E. Web App. Builder Developer Edition)?

Best regards
Ezequias

Hello

This feature is quite nice but there is one problem. We can't see all related points when click in a cluster point (click on the cluster '3' and showing some radial lines to this three points related).

Would be nice to have this implementation. We can't figure out the elements of each cluster.

See sample: http://lele3p.altervista.org/examples/cluster27/index.html

Sincerelly
Ezequias Rocha

Our project relies on ClusterLayer. It was working when we were using SystemJS and Visual Studio. Now that we have separated the front end from the back end and use VS Code primarily as our front-end editor, ClusterLayer no longer works. We are also now using webpack. We are having a hard time getting ClusterLayer.js to work in 3.18 with our new configuation. After creating a typings file for it, tsc compiles and the site runs without error. However, for some reason no clusters are showing up. Can you offer any advice or do you know of anyone who has a similar setup to ours that we could use to help us along? Thanks,
Kai

When I try to instantiate several cluster layers, only the first one created shows up on the map. I traced it back to _setMap not being called for the other ones, even though I call map.addLayer(clusterLayer) for each. I cant seem to find why the remaining layers do not appear.

I'm trying to stop clustering after a map extent and show the features independently instead, but couldn't find a solution for it. Kindly help! Thanks in advance.

Looks like as of PR #15 _reCluster is no longer being fired on the map's extent-change event. gh-pages hasn't been updated since the merge, so everything appears fine there, but master is broken.

hi, @alaframboise . if i want to show the clusterlayer by the local data, but not from the published featurelayer url, how can i do it ? thanks.

The "styled" example in the gh-pages branch is using a service that throws a "token required" error.

https://github.com/Esri/cluster-layer-js/blob/gh-pages/styled.html#L241

Service URL:
http://services1.arcgis.com/EwZCWiHAzgPcnGng/arcgis/rest/services/Magnitude_7_Earthquakes/FeatureServer/0

Hello,
I have been having single and cluster click issues in Chrome. This has been happening on both your demo and my local copy. Basically the click event does not fire and the extent change event fires,

It is VERY hard to duplicate and the only way to get the click back is to close all instances of the browser. Clearing the cache, hard refresh does not work. Its very strange.

Is this a known issue?

chrome version: 48.0.2564.97 m

Thanks,

Andrew

Does this Cluster Layer works in the Esri Javascript 4.0 (Currently in beta) ? If not, will this cluster layer become a build-in feature within the upcoming ArcGIS Esri JavaScript 4.0 Framework ?

Hello,
I have been having single and cluster click issues in Chrome. This has been happending on both yoru demo and my local copy. Basically the click event does not fire and the extent change event fires,

It is VERY hard to duplicate and othe only way to get the click back is to close all instacnes of the beowser. Clearning the cache, hard refresh does not work. Its very strange.

Is this a known issue?

Thanks,

What renderers are supported via the singleRenderer param? I've tried a unique value renderer and a simple renderer, each with no luck.

https://github.com/Esri/cluster-layer-js/blob/master/src/clusterfeaturelayer.js#L470-L483

                if (uncached.length > this._returnLimit) {
                    while(uncached.length) {
                        // Improve performance by just passing list of IDs
                        this._query.objectIds = uncached.splice(0, this._returnLimit - 1);
                        queries.push(this.queryTask.execute(this._query));
                    }
                    all(queries).then(lang.hitch(this, function(res) {
                        var features = arrayUtils.map(res, function(r) {
                            return r.features;
                        });
                        this._onFeaturesReturned({
                            features: merge(features)
                        });
                    }));

really puts the rage on an arcgis server that has more than a good demos worth of features. I sort of figured that returnLimit would act on a feature layer's virtual grid instead of doing snap shot style spin up a query task to download every feature - In our case being 15mb's gzipped. Should this cluster layer inherit from FeatureLayer to get access to the virtual grid instead of graphics layer?

In the future there is going to have to be server side point clustering to handle these scenarios. Are you in the loop enough to know if that is on the right peoples radar?

Is there a way to hide point labels when zooming. At current time, labels become visible as you zoom in, but once visible they are not hiding again after zooming out. Can you control label visibility within the cluster based on zoom level

Thank you

My feature layer which i am clustering have two symbolizes (e.g. active and inactive). is there a way i can get both symbols on single-symbol option using where clause. Or can i create multiple cluster layers on single map, with different symbol.

singles are currently being drawn regardless of the showSingles value.

Clicking on clusters neither zooms or shows any popup (IE or Chrome, local or in the hosted examples). Clicking on singles doesn't show a popup either (although hovering on a single in the styled example does). Is this still actively being worked on?

Has anyone else noticed that getting clusters and individual points to draw beyond +/-180 lng is not consistent? When zoomed out to the world and panning E/W, I occasionally notice "flashing" visibility of where they should be, but more often they do not show up. Both the repo's demo and my own experiments in wkid 102100 are experiencing this.

I started playing around within the _inExtent method with normalizing the map's extent and I see that in fact the valid array is getting more cached clusters pushed to it than before; however, I'm still trying to learn my way around from the map's extent-change to this layer's clusters-shown emit to see what else may be causing this. Has anyone already looked into this? If not, I'd be glad to dive in further.

I would like to know if it is possible to categorize the cluster according some feature characteristic.

It would be great if it could be represented as in:

http://ipeluffo.github.io/itba-bigdata-final-2015/vis.html

Hi @alaframboise, I'm implementing clusterfeaturelayer.js into a WAB widget. I'm using the layer as the result for a widget that executes queries (with where, geometry, unit, distance params) on a FL.

The user will be updating and executing the search multiple times, but I don't see a way to modify the clusterfeaturelayer once it has been instantiated and added to the map. It appears the CFL has a refresh method, but it doesn't appear to be working. Also, I'm not sure how to set new params.

Can you think of a quick way to do this? Ideally, it'd look something like this:

        this._clusterLayer.setWhere(whereString);
        if (this._searchByLocation == true) {
          this._clusterLayer.setGeometry(this._clickLocation);
          this._clusterLayer.setDistance($(".dist-input").val());
          this._clusterLayer.setUnits( $(".unit-input").val());
        }
        this._clusterLayer.refresh();

I've also modified your code slightly to take geometry params, as well:

      this._where = options.where || null;
      this._geom = options.geometry || null;
      this._dist = options.distance || null;
      this._units = options.units || null;

    // Get the features by IDs
    _getObjectIds: function(extent) {
      // debug
      // this._startGetOids = new Date().valueOf();
      // console.debug('#_getObjectIds start');

      if (this.url) {
        var ext = extent || this._map.extent;
        this._query.objectIds = null;
        if (this._where) {
          this._query.where = this._where;
        }
        if (this._geom) {
          this._query.geometry = this._geom;
        } else if (!this.MODE_SNAPSHOT) {
          this._query.geometry = ext;
        }
        if (this._dist) {
          this._query.distance = this._dist;
        }
        if (this._units) {
          this._query.units = this._units;
        }
        if (!this._query.geometry && !this._query.where) {
          this._query.where = '1=1';
        }
        this.queryTask.executeForIds(this._query).then(
          lang.hitch(this, '_onIdsReturned'), this._onError
        );
      }
    },

Trying to add ClassBreakRenderer for clustering behaviour and for showing different color symbol for single location based on input field, so i tried to use UniqueValueRenderer in same layer too, but seems we can 't use more than one renderer.
Either we can have clustering behaviour or UniqueValueRenderer based on some input attribute value,,
if any one tried and able to get it,please tell how to do it