Using wrong version of phaser-tiled about lttp HOT 2 CLOSED

Seems like that's the map asset packer, nevermind. Still getting my head around this please bare with me.

from lttp.

1. LESS. There's almost no CSS. Why?

Why not? webpack and npm do all of this for you, you shouldn't even notice it is less. imports, and variables is basically why.

2. EJS. There's almost no HTML. Why?

Because we inject values into it during webpack build. This is done by compiling the ejs and inserting the bundles who's names are not preknown.

3. Gulp and webpack? I don't get it.

Webpack builds the bundle js file, but there is more to the build than that. We need to build asset packs for the maps, lint the code, watch for changes on all things (not just bundle js), etc.

4. Inheriting Phaser classes makes it difficult to reason where things happening, in LTTP or in Phaser.

Not sure I understand what you are saying here.

TypeScript - already a big step, and many JS devs will not bother with non-raw JS libraries, and the gains are questionable here - outside of the core game engine.

Typescript is used as ES6 + types here. If no typescript was used, the code would look nearly identical since it would be ES6. I'm not worried about adoption or getting other devs on-board. I'm just building something I find fun to work on.

from lttp.