See enanomapper/ontologies#130

First page mentions: "A list of ontologies it includes includes the following:" this suggests that the list below that is not a complete list. Why not complete the list and state it is complete?

"most ontologies include bits from other ontologies;" is given as a reason to not include full ontologies. This brings up the question why that is a problem. I suppose you mean to say that in that case you will take it from the source ontology if it is relevant in the first place. But ... would it not be relevant to also capture that it, in fact, occurs in both? Or is that something you would figure out elsewhere?

Under "Adding a terms from an already used ontology" (there is "a terms" must be a typo btw) it says:
"where in the eNanoMapper ontology should your selection show up?". That suggests it could show up under something that is not from that same (already used) ontology. Does that really make sense? Can you have 1) a branch that is below an existing branch from the same ontology but no longer connected via terms from that ontology (that feels strange, maybe, in that case, you should improve the source?) 2) have two branches used from an ontology but not use the part directly on top of both? That too feels strange, but I could imagine using wider terms at some stage, allowing the addition of parallel branches from other ontologies. I think that at least would need some review.

Melanie suggested to add notion in the tutorial for OLS sets, to restrict the ontologies in which is searched:

https://twitter.com/mcourtot/status/842645601665933312

This could be used to first select just in the set of ontologies used by the eNanoMapper ontology.

... which is all capatalized. Linda, can you please update the PDF with a good URL, that is not full CAPS?

The example is given in https://github.com/enanomapper/tutorials/blob/master/BrowseOntology/Tutorial%20browsing%20eNM%20ontology.md

The original tutorial had a link to the data. Can this be linked to in the Markdown version too?

Freddie, I am copy/pasting CLW info from the document, but not sure if this is always correct. Can you please check it, and correct if needed (in both the readme.md and the Word file)?

Now:

I suggest to split it into separate file, one file for each chapter, and with the intro in the main README.md.