cryptimeleon / benchmark Goto Github PK

I just rendered the math Javadoc and noticed that Javadoc does not support markdown type paragraph formatting, i.e. inserting an empty line between paragraphs. This leads to a lot of block of texts without any formatting applied. Instead, HTML tags such as <p> should be utilized.

Furthermore, code blocks should be formatted using the HTML tag <pre>, or the @code annotation for inline code.

We should take a look over the Javadoc and fix any such issues before the next release.

Math has support for binary serialization of representations.
It would be useful to measure the footprint of this serialization for different cryptographic objects.
This could then be used in the release paper and to compare the serialization size with other libraries.

The Charm library implements a type 3 version of Waters' ABE scheme. We also have implemented this scheme in craco. It would be nice to compare these two implementations to have an idea of how we compare to Charm in terms of performance.

This would require adding a benchmark to Charm and to this project as neither exists yet.

I've seen the string "-agentpath:/home/raphael/async-profiler/build/libasyncProfiler.so" in several locations (e.g., PS18SignBenchmark).

What is that?

The script then does not correctly checkout develop in all cases. Instead it will try to checkout the branch corresponding to the branch name of the repository that is currently being built. Already fixed this for Groupsig, but this issue serves as a reminder.